Learning Curves and Competences of Vascular Trainees Performing Open Aortic Repair in a Simulation-Based Environment

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Learning Curves and Competences of Vascular Trainees Performing Open Aortic Repair in a Simulation-Based Environment. / Lawaetz, Jonathan; Nayahangan, Leizl Joy; Strøm, Michael; de la Motte, Louise; Rørdam, Peter; Grøndal, Nikolaj; Gottschalksen, Bo; Konge, Lars; Eiberg, Jonas.

In: Annals of Vascular Surgery, Vol. 72, 2021, p. 430-439.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Lawaetz, J, Nayahangan, LJ, Strøm, M, de la Motte, L, Rørdam, P, Grøndal, N, Gottschalksen, B, Konge, L & Eiberg, J 2021, 'Learning Curves and Competences of Vascular Trainees Performing Open Aortic Repair in a Simulation-Based Environment', Annals of Vascular Surgery, vol. 72, pp. 430-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2020.09.009

APA

Lawaetz, J., Nayahangan, L. J., Strøm, M., de la Motte, L., Rørdam, P., Grøndal, N., Gottschalksen, B., Konge, L., & Eiberg, J. (2021). Learning Curves and Competences of Vascular Trainees Performing Open Aortic Repair in a Simulation-Based Environment. Annals of Vascular Surgery, 72, 430-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2020.09.009

Vancouver

Lawaetz J, Nayahangan LJ, Strøm M, de la Motte L, Rørdam P, Grøndal N et al. Learning Curves and Competences of Vascular Trainees Performing Open Aortic Repair in a Simulation-Based Environment. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2021;72:430-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2020.09.009

Author

Lawaetz, Jonathan ; Nayahangan, Leizl Joy ; Strøm, Michael ; de la Motte, Louise ; Rørdam, Peter ; Grøndal, Nikolaj ; Gottschalksen, Bo ; Konge, Lars ; Eiberg, Jonas. / Learning Curves and Competences of Vascular Trainees Performing Open Aortic Repair in a Simulation-Based Environment. In: Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2021 ; Vol. 72. pp. 430-439.

Bibtex

@article{67da83d48e7742a7926bd6d4d89cab3e,
title = "Learning Curves and Competences of Vascular Trainees Performing Open Aortic Repair in a Simulation-Based Environment",
abstract = "Background: The aim of this study was to analyze learning curves and competency gains of novice vascular trainees when performing open aortic repair in a simulation-based environment. Methods: This was a prospective study of 16 vascular trainees performing infrarenal open aortic repair on an inanimate abdominal aortic aneurysm simulator with pulsatile pressure and flow. Each participant performed 4 procedures as a primary surgeon while getting structured feedback by a supervising experienced vascular surgeon. All sessions were video recorded and were anonymously and independently assessed by 3 rater-trained experts on an online platform using the newly validated open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair of technical expertise assessment tool. All supervisor interferences and procedure time was noted. Results: Reliability between raters was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.92). Participants' mean scores almost doubled during the course between the first (13.4, 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.8–20) and fourth session (29.8, 95% CI, 26.3–33.3) with a mean difference of 14.6 (P < 0.001). Supervisor interference also decreased significantly from mean 3.0 (95% CI, 1.5–3.6) in the first to 0.7 (95% CI, 0.4–1.0) in the fourth session (P = 0.004). Procedure time decreased with a mean of 24 minutes: from 81 min (95% CI, 71.8–90.3) to 57 min (95% CI, 51.1–63.2, P < 0.001). There was a significant negative correlation between procedure time and the Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair of Technical Expertise score (Pearson's r = −0.72, P < 0.01). Only half of the participants passed the pass/fail score of 27.7 points during the course. Conclusions: Novice vascular trainees achieve skills and competencies in open aortic repair in a simulated setting with dedicated supervision and feedback and can become ready for supervised surgery on real patients. Learning rates are individual, and it is important to construct training programs with emphasis on proficiency and not merely attending a course.",
author = "Jonathan Lawaetz and Nayahangan, {Leizl Joy} and Michael Str{\o}m and {de la Motte}, Louise and Peter R{\o}rdam and Nikolaj Gr{\o}ndal and Bo Gottschalksen and Lars Konge and Jonas Eiberg",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1016/j.avsg.2020.09.009",
language = "English",
volume = "72",
pages = "430--439",
journal = "Annals of Vascular Surgery",
issn = "0890-5096",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning Curves and Competences of Vascular Trainees Performing Open Aortic Repair in a Simulation-Based Environment

AU - Lawaetz, Jonathan

AU - Nayahangan, Leizl Joy

AU - Strøm, Michael

AU - de la Motte, Louise

AU - Rørdam, Peter

AU - Grøndal, Nikolaj

AU - Gottschalksen, Bo

AU - Konge, Lars

AU - Eiberg, Jonas

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Background: The aim of this study was to analyze learning curves and competency gains of novice vascular trainees when performing open aortic repair in a simulation-based environment. Methods: This was a prospective study of 16 vascular trainees performing infrarenal open aortic repair on an inanimate abdominal aortic aneurysm simulator with pulsatile pressure and flow. Each participant performed 4 procedures as a primary surgeon while getting structured feedback by a supervising experienced vascular surgeon. All sessions were video recorded and were anonymously and independently assessed by 3 rater-trained experts on an online platform using the newly validated open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair of technical expertise assessment tool. All supervisor interferences and procedure time was noted. Results: Reliability between raters was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.92). Participants' mean scores almost doubled during the course between the first (13.4, 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.8–20) and fourth session (29.8, 95% CI, 26.3–33.3) with a mean difference of 14.6 (P < 0.001). Supervisor interference also decreased significantly from mean 3.0 (95% CI, 1.5–3.6) in the first to 0.7 (95% CI, 0.4–1.0) in the fourth session (P = 0.004). Procedure time decreased with a mean of 24 minutes: from 81 min (95% CI, 71.8–90.3) to 57 min (95% CI, 51.1–63.2, P < 0.001). There was a significant negative correlation between procedure time and the Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair of Technical Expertise score (Pearson's r = −0.72, P < 0.01). Only half of the participants passed the pass/fail score of 27.7 points during the course. Conclusions: Novice vascular trainees achieve skills and competencies in open aortic repair in a simulated setting with dedicated supervision and feedback and can become ready for supervised surgery on real patients. Learning rates are individual, and it is important to construct training programs with emphasis on proficiency and not merely attending a course.

AB - Background: The aim of this study was to analyze learning curves and competency gains of novice vascular trainees when performing open aortic repair in a simulation-based environment. Methods: This was a prospective study of 16 vascular trainees performing infrarenal open aortic repair on an inanimate abdominal aortic aneurysm simulator with pulsatile pressure and flow. Each participant performed 4 procedures as a primary surgeon while getting structured feedback by a supervising experienced vascular surgeon. All sessions were video recorded and were anonymously and independently assessed by 3 rater-trained experts on an online platform using the newly validated open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair of technical expertise assessment tool. All supervisor interferences and procedure time was noted. Results: Reliability between raters was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.92). Participants' mean scores almost doubled during the course between the first (13.4, 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.8–20) and fourth session (29.8, 95% CI, 26.3–33.3) with a mean difference of 14.6 (P < 0.001). Supervisor interference also decreased significantly from mean 3.0 (95% CI, 1.5–3.6) in the first to 0.7 (95% CI, 0.4–1.0) in the fourth session (P = 0.004). Procedure time decreased with a mean of 24 minutes: from 81 min (95% CI, 71.8–90.3) to 57 min (95% CI, 51.1–63.2, P < 0.001). There was a significant negative correlation between procedure time and the Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair of Technical Expertise score (Pearson's r = −0.72, P < 0.01). Only half of the participants passed the pass/fail score of 27.7 points during the course. Conclusions: Novice vascular trainees achieve skills and competencies in open aortic repair in a simulated setting with dedicated supervision and feedback and can become ready for supervised surgery on real patients. Learning rates are individual, and it is important to construct training programs with emphasis on proficiency and not merely attending a course.

U2 - 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.09.009

DO - 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.09.009

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32949741

AN - SCOPUS:85092651152

VL - 72

SP - 430

EP - 439

JO - Annals of Vascular Surgery

JF - Annals of Vascular Surgery

SN - 0890-5096

ER -

ID: 251944295