Differences in Psychometric Properties of Clinician- and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Atopic Dermatitis by Race and Skin Tone: A Systematic Review
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
The psychometric validity and reliability of widely used atopic dermatitis (AD) outcome measures across different races and ethnicities are unclear. We describe the rates of reporting race, ethnicity, and skin tone in studies testing the psychometric properties of AD outcome measures and compare the psychometric analyses across race, ethnicity, and skin tone. We systematically reviewed MEDLINE and EMBASE for studies reporting psychometric properties of clinician-reported or patient-reported outcome measures in AD (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews: CRD42021239614). Overall, 16,100 nonduplicate articles were screened; 165 met inclusion criteria. Race and/or ethnicity were reported in 55 (33.3%) studies; of those, race was assessed by self-report in 10 studies (6.1%) or was unspecified in 45 (27.3%). A total of 16 studies (9.7%) evaluated psychometric property differences by race, and only five (4.4%) of those did not recognize it as a limitation. Properties assessed across race, ethnicity, or skin tone were differential item functioning, convergent validity feasibility, inter-rater reliability, intrarater reliability, test‒retest reliability, and known-groups validity. Multiple instruments demonstrated performance differences across ethnoracial groups. This review highlights the paucity of race/ethnicity consideration for psychometric property testing in AD outcome measurement instruments. More AD outcomes instruments should be validated in diverse populations.
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Tidsskrift | Journal of Investigative Dermatology |
Vol/bind | 142 |
Udgave nummer | 2 |
Sider (fra-til) | 364-381 |
Antal sider | 18 |
ISSN | 0022-202X |
DOI | |
Status | Udgivet - 2022 |
Bibliografisk note
Funding Information:
EC's effort on this research was supported by the National Institute of Nursing Research of the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD) under Award number T32NR019035. EC’s research was also supported by a Pfizer Dermatology Research Fellowship.
Funding Information:
EC's effort on this research was supported by the National Institute of Nursing Research of the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD) under Award number T32NR019035. EC's research was also supported by a Pfizer Dermatology Research Fellowship. Conceptualization: JIS; Data Curation: TK, UR, AG, DMA, EC; Formal Analysis: TK, UR, AG, DMA, EC, JIS; Writing - Original Draft Preparation: TK, UR, AG, DMA, EC, JIS; Writing - Review and Editing: TK, UR, AG, DMA, EC, JPT, AA, JIS, The content of this study is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
Links
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8792149/pdf/nihms-1730002.pdf
Accepteret manuskript
ID: 321558031