Itch sensitization? A systematic review of studies using quantitative sensory testing in patients with chronic itch

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Itch sensitization? A systematic review of studies using quantitative sensory testing in patients with chronic itch. / Van Laarhoven, Antoinette I.M.; Marker, Jens B.; Elberling, Jesper; Yosipovitch, Gil; Arendt-Nielsen, Lars; Andersen, Hjalte H.

I: Pain, Bind 160, Nr. 12, 2019, s. 2661-2678.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Van Laarhoven, AIM, Marker, JB, Elberling, J, Yosipovitch, G, Arendt-Nielsen, L & Andersen, HH 2019, 'Itch sensitization? A systematic review of studies using quantitative sensory testing in patients with chronic itch', Pain, bind 160, nr. 12, s. 2661-2678. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001678

APA

Van Laarhoven, A. I. M., Marker, J. B., Elberling, J., Yosipovitch, G., Arendt-Nielsen, L., & Andersen, H. H. (2019). Itch sensitization? A systematic review of studies using quantitative sensory testing in patients with chronic itch. Pain, 160(12), 2661-2678. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001678

Vancouver

Van Laarhoven AIM, Marker JB, Elberling J, Yosipovitch G, Arendt-Nielsen L, Andersen HH. Itch sensitization? A systematic review of studies using quantitative sensory testing in patients with chronic itch. Pain. 2019;160(12):2661-2678. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001678

Author

Van Laarhoven, Antoinette I.M. ; Marker, Jens B. ; Elberling, Jesper ; Yosipovitch, Gil ; Arendt-Nielsen, Lars ; Andersen, Hjalte H. / Itch sensitization? A systematic review of studies using quantitative sensory testing in patients with chronic itch. I: Pain. 2019 ; Bind 160, Nr. 12. s. 2661-2678.

Bibtex

@article{241b057f463a4e7683f62645b4bde940,
title = "Itch sensitization? A systematic review of studies using quantitative sensory testing in patients with chronic itch",
abstract = "As well established for patients with chronic pain, patients suffering from chronic itch also exhibit signs of peripheral and central sensitization. This has been linked to parallel neuroplastic sensitization processes. However, for chronic itch, sensitization has not yet been systematically assessed, studied, and hence validated. This review (Prospero CRD42016043002) summarizes and meta-analytically evaluates whether sensory aberrations including sensitization for itch occur in chronic itch. Databases PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies investigating somatosensory sensitivity assessment by quantitative sensory testing stimuli, including experimental cutaneous chemical pruritic provocations, in patients with chronic itch from skin/neurological conditions and compared with healthy controls. Outcomes were extracted for lesional and nonlesional skin, and risk of biases were assessed. Meta-analyses were performed when sufficient quantitative data were available. Of 4667 identified articles, 46 were included and 25 were eligible for meta-analyses. Patients (66% atopic dermatitis [AD]) were found more sensitive than the controls to histamine-evoked itch in lesional skin (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.66 confidence interval [CI]: 0.16-1.15), but not nonlesionally (SMD: -0.26 [CI: -0.58 to 0.06]). Cowhage did not evoke more itch in nonlesional skin of patients as compared to the controls (SMD: 0.38 [CI: -0.04 to 0.81]). For numerous other chemical provocations as well as for mechanical, thermal, and electrical stimulation paradigms, results were ambiguous or based on few studies. Patients with chronic itch are only robustly sensitized to various chemical pruritic stimuli when applied lesionally. More studies on somatosensory aberrations in chronic itch conditions other than AD are needed to establish whether sensitization is robustly present across chronic itch conditions.",
keywords = "Alloknesis, Central sensitization, Hyperknesis, Neuroplasticity, Pain, Peripheral sensitization, Pruritus, Quantitative sensory testing",
author = "{Van Laarhoven}, {Antoinette I.M.} and Marker, {Jens B.} and Jesper Elberling and Gil Yosipovitch and Lars Arendt-Nielsen and Andersen, {Hjalte H.}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001678",
language = "English",
volume = "160",
pages = "2661--2678",
journal = "Pain",
issn = "0304-3959",
publisher = "IASP Press",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Itch sensitization? A systematic review of studies using quantitative sensory testing in patients with chronic itch

AU - Van Laarhoven, Antoinette I.M.

AU - Marker, Jens B.

AU - Elberling, Jesper

AU - Yosipovitch, Gil

AU - Arendt-Nielsen, Lars

AU - Andersen, Hjalte H.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - As well established for patients with chronic pain, patients suffering from chronic itch also exhibit signs of peripheral and central sensitization. This has been linked to parallel neuroplastic sensitization processes. However, for chronic itch, sensitization has not yet been systematically assessed, studied, and hence validated. This review (Prospero CRD42016043002) summarizes and meta-analytically evaluates whether sensory aberrations including sensitization for itch occur in chronic itch. Databases PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies investigating somatosensory sensitivity assessment by quantitative sensory testing stimuli, including experimental cutaneous chemical pruritic provocations, in patients with chronic itch from skin/neurological conditions and compared with healthy controls. Outcomes were extracted for lesional and nonlesional skin, and risk of biases were assessed. Meta-analyses were performed when sufficient quantitative data were available. Of 4667 identified articles, 46 were included and 25 were eligible for meta-analyses. Patients (66% atopic dermatitis [AD]) were found more sensitive than the controls to histamine-evoked itch in lesional skin (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.66 confidence interval [CI]: 0.16-1.15), but not nonlesionally (SMD: -0.26 [CI: -0.58 to 0.06]). Cowhage did not evoke more itch in nonlesional skin of patients as compared to the controls (SMD: 0.38 [CI: -0.04 to 0.81]). For numerous other chemical provocations as well as for mechanical, thermal, and electrical stimulation paradigms, results were ambiguous or based on few studies. Patients with chronic itch are only robustly sensitized to various chemical pruritic stimuli when applied lesionally. More studies on somatosensory aberrations in chronic itch conditions other than AD are needed to establish whether sensitization is robustly present across chronic itch conditions.

AB - As well established for patients with chronic pain, patients suffering from chronic itch also exhibit signs of peripheral and central sensitization. This has been linked to parallel neuroplastic sensitization processes. However, for chronic itch, sensitization has not yet been systematically assessed, studied, and hence validated. This review (Prospero CRD42016043002) summarizes and meta-analytically evaluates whether sensory aberrations including sensitization for itch occur in chronic itch. Databases PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies investigating somatosensory sensitivity assessment by quantitative sensory testing stimuli, including experimental cutaneous chemical pruritic provocations, in patients with chronic itch from skin/neurological conditions and compared with healthy controls. Outcomes were extracted for lesional and nonlesional skin, and risk of biases were assessed. Meta-analyses were performed when sufficient quantitative data were available. Of 4667 identified articles, 46 were included and 25 were eligible for meta-analyses. Patients (66% atopic dermatitis [AD]) were found more sensitive than the controls to histamine-evoked itch in lesional skin (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.66 confidence interval [CI]: 0.16-1.15), but not nonlesionally (SMD: -0.26 [CI: -0.58 to 0.06]). Cowhage did not evoke more itch in nonlesional skin of patients as compared to the controls (SMD: 0.38 [CI: -0.04 to 0.81]). For numerous other chemical provocations as well as for mechanical, thermal, and electrical stimulation paradigms, results were ambiguous or based on few studies. Patients with chronic itch are only robustly sensitized to various chemical pruritic stimuli when applied lesionally. More studies on somatosensory aberrations in chronic itch conditions other than AD are needed to establish whether sensitization is robustly present across chronic itch conditions.

KW - Alloknesis

KW - Central sensitization

KW - Hyperknesis

KW - Neuroplasticity

KW - Pain

KW - Peripheral sensitization

KW - Pruritus

KW - Quantitative sensory testing

U2 - 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001678

DO - 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001678

M3 - Review

C2 - 31408048

AN - SCOPUS:85074962404

VL - 160

SP - 2661

EP - 2678

JO - Pain

JF - Pain

SN - 0304-3959

IS - 12

ER -

ID: 241371238