Dapagliflozin in HFrEF Patients Treated With Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists: An Analysis of DAPA-HF

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

  • Li Shen
  • Søren Lund Kristensen
  • Olof Bengtsson
  • Michael Böhm
  • Rudolf A. de Boer
  • Kieran F. Docherty
  • Silvio E. Inzucchi
  • Tzvetana Katova
  • Mikhail N. Kosiborod
  • Anna Maria Langkilde
  • Daniel Lindholm
  • M. Felipe A. Martinez
  • Eileen O'Meara
  • Jose C. Nicolau
  • Mark C. Petrie
  • Piotr Ponikowski
  • Marc S. Sabatine
  • Mikaela Sjöstrand
  • Scott D. Solomon
  • Pardeep S. Jhund
  • John J.V. McMurray

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in patients taking or not taking an mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) at baseline in the DAPA-HF (Dapagliflozin And Prevention of Adverse outcomes in Heart Failure) trial. Background: MRAs and sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors each have diuretic activity, lower blood pressure, and reduce glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Therefore, it is important to investigate the safety, as well as efficacy, of their combination. Methods: A total of 4,744 patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) were randomized to placebo or dapagliflozin 10 mg daily. The efficacy of dapagliflozin on the primary composite outcome (cardiovascular death or episode of worsening heart failure) and its components was examined according to MRA use, as were predefined safety outcomes. Results: A total of 3,370 patients (71%) were treated with an MRA and they were younger (65 vs. 69 years of age), less often from North America (9% vs. 26%), had worse New York Heart Association functional class (35% vs. 25% in class III/IV), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (30.7% vs. 31.9%) and systolic blood pressure (120.3 vs. 125.5 mm Hg), but higher estimated GFR (67.1 vs. 62.6 ml/min/1.73 m2), than patients not taking an MRA. The benefit of dapagliflozin compared with placebo was similar in patients taking or not taking an MRA: hazard ratio: 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63 to 0.87) versus 0.74 (95% CI: 0.57 to 0.95), respectively, for the primary endpoint (p value for interaction = 0.97); similar findings were observed for secondary endpoints. In both MRA subgroups, safety outcomes were similar in patients randomized to dapagliflozin or placebo. Conclusions: Dapagliflozin was similarly efficacious and safe in patients with HFrEF taking or not taking an MRA, supporting the use of both drugs together. (Study to Evaluate the Effect of Dapagliflozin on the Incidence of Worsening Heart Failure or Cardiovascular Death in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure [DAPA-HF]; NCT03036124)

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJACC: Heart Failure
Vol/bind9
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)254-264
ISSN2213-1779
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2021

Bibliografisk note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021

ID: 301808653