Efficacy on resynchronization and longitudinal contractile function comparing His-bundle pacing with conventional biventricular pacing: a substudy to the His-alternative study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Efficacy on resynchronization and longitudinal contractile function comparing His-bundle pacing with conventional biventricular pacing : a substudy to the His-alternative study. / Højgaard, E. V.; Philbert, B. T.; Linde, J. J.; Winsløw, U. C.; Svendsen, J. H.; Vinther, M.; Risum, N.

I: European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging, Bind 25, Nr. 1, 2024, s. 66-74.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Højgaard, EV, Philbert, BT, Linde, JJ, Winsløw, UC, Svendsen, JH, Vinther, M & Risum, N 2024, 'Efficacy on resynchronization and longitudinal contractile function comparing His-bundle pacing with conventional biventricular pacing: a substudy to the His-alternative study', European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging, bind 25, nr. 1, s. 66-74. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jead181

APA

Højgaard, E. V., Philbert, B. T., Linde, J. J., Winsløw, U. C., Svendsen, J. H., Vinther, M., & Risum, N. (2024). Efficacy on resynchronization and longitudinal contractile function comparing His-bundle pacing with conventional biventricular pacing: a substudy to the His-alternative study. European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging, 25(1), 66-74. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jead181

Vancouver

Højgaard EV, Philbert BT, Linde JJ, Winsløw UC, Svendsen JH, Vinther M o.a. Efficacy on resynchronization and longitudinal contractile function comparing His-bundle pacing with conventional biventricular pacing: a substudy to the His-alternative study. European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging. 2024;25(1):66-74. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jead181

Author

Højgaard, E. V. ; Philbert, B. T. ; Linde, J. J. ; Winsløw, U. C. ; Svendsen, J. H. ; Vinther, M. ; Risum, N. / Efficacy on resynchronization and longitudinal contractile function comparing His-bundle pacing with conventional biventricular pacing : a substudy to the His-alternative study. I: European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging. 2024 ; Bind 25, Nr. 1. s. 66-74.

Bibtex

@article{08fc1ccf62f04a23902f700af37e81d1,
title = "Efficacy on resynchronization and longitudinal contractile function comparing His-bundle pacing with conventional biventricular pacing: a substudy to the His-alternative study",
abstract = "Aims His-bundle pacing has emerged as a novel method to deliver cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, there are no data comparing conventional biventricular (BiV)-CRT with His-CRT with regard to effects on mechanical dyssynchrony and longitudinal contractile function. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Methods Patients with symptomatic heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35%, and left bundle branch block (LBBB) by strict and results ECG criteria were randomized 1:1 to His-CRT or BiV-CRT. Two-dimensional strain echocardiography was performed prior to CRT implantation and at 6 months after implantation. Differences in changes in mechanical dyssynchrony (standard deviation of time-to-peak in 12 midventricular and basal segments) and regional longitudinal strain in the six left ventricular walls were compared between the BiV-CRT and His-CRT groups. In the on-treatment analysis, 31 received BiV-CRT and 19 His-CRT. In both groups, mechanical dyssynchrony was significantly reduced after 6 months [BiV group from 120 ms (±45) to 63 ms (±22), P < 0.001, and His group from 116 ms (±54) to 49 ms (±11), P < 0.001] but no significant differences in changes could be demonstrated between groups [−9.0 ms (−36; 18), P = 0.50]. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) improved in both groups [BiV group from −9.1% (±2.7) to −10.7% (±2.6), P = 0.02, and His group from −8.6% (±2.1) to −11.1% (±2.0), P < 0.001], but no significant differences in changes could be demonstrated from baseline to follow-up [−0.9% (−2.4; −0.6), P = 0.25] between groups. There were no regional differences between groups. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Conclusion In heart failure, patients with LBBB, BiV-CRT, and His-CRT have comparable effects with regard to improvements in mechanical dyssynchrony and longitudinal contractile function.",
keywords = "2D speckle tracking, biventricular pacing, cardiac resynchronization therapy, heart failure, His-bundle pacing, left bundle branch block",
author = "H{\o}jgaard, {E. V.} and Philbert, {B. T.} and Linde, {J. J.} and Winsl{\o}w, {U. C.} and Svendsen, {J. H.} and M. Vinther and N. Risum",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1093/ehjci/jead181",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "66--74",
journal = "European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging",
issn = "2047-2404",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficacy on resynchronization and longitudinal contractile function comparing His-bundle pacing with conventional biventricular pacing

T2 - a substudy to the His-alternative study

AU - Højgaard, E. V.

AU - Philbert, B. T.

AU - Linde, J. J.

AU - Winsløw, U. C.

AU - Svendsen, J. H.

AU - Vinther, M.

AU - Risum, N.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Aims His-bundle pacing has emerged as a novel method to deliver cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, there are no data comparing conventional biventricular (BiV)-CRT with His-CRT with regard to effects on mechanical dyssynchrony and longitudinal contractile function. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Methods Patients with symptomatic heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35%, and left bundle branch block (LBBB) by strict and results ECG criteria were randomized 1:1 to His-CRT or BiV-CRT. Two-dimensional strain echocardiography was performed prior to CRT implantation and at 6 months after implantation. Differences in changes in mechanical dyssynchrony (standard deviation of time-to-peak in 12 midventricular and basal segments) and regional longitudinal strain in the six left ventricular walls were compared between the BiV-CRT and His-CRT groups. In the on-treatment analysis, 31 received BiV-CRT and 19 His-CRT. In both groups, mechanical dyssynchrony was significantly reduced after 6 months [BiV group from 120 ms (±45) to 63 ms (±22), P < 0.001, and His group from 116 ms (±54) to 49 ms (±11), P < 0.001] but no significant differences in changes could be demonstrated between groups [−9.0 ms (−36; 18), P = 0.50]. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) improved in both groups [BiV group from −9.1% (±2.7) to −10.7% (±2.6), P = 0.02, and His group from −8.6% (±2.1) to −11.1% (±2.0), P < 0.001], but no significant differences in changes could be demonstrated from baseline to follow-up [−0.9% (−2.4; −0.6), P = 0.25] between groups. There were no regional differences between groups. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Conclusion In heart failure, patients with LBBB, BiV-CRT, and His-CRT have comparable effects with regard to improvements in mechanical dyssynchrony and longitudinal contractile function.

AB - Aims His-bundle pacing has emerged as a novel method to deliver cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, there are no data comparing conventional biventricular (BiV)-CRT with His-CRT with regard to effects on mechanical dyssynchrony and longitudinal contractile function. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Methods Patients with symptomatic heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35%, and left bundle branch block (LBBB) by strict and results ECG criteria were randomized 1:1 to His-CRT or BiV-CRT. Two-dimensional strain echocardiography was performed prior to CRT implantation and at 6 months after implantation. Differences in changes in mechanical dyssynchrony (standard deviation of time-to-peak in 12 midventricular and basal segments) and regional longitudinal strain in the six left ventricular walls were compared between the BiV-CRT and His-CRT groups. In the on-treatment analysis, 31 received BiV-CRT and 19 His-CRT. In both groups, mechanical dyssynchrony was significantly reduced after 6 months [BiV group from 120 ms (±45) to 63 ms (±22), P < 0.001, and His group from 116 ms (±54) to 49 ms (±11), P < 0.001] but no significant differences in changes could be demonstrated between groups [−9.0 ms (−36; 18), P = 0.50]. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) improved in both groups [BiV group from −9.1% (±2.7) to −10.7% (±2.6), P = 0.02, and His group from −8.6% (±2.1) to −11.1% (±2.0), P < 0.001], but no significant differences in changes could be demonstrated from baseline to follow-up [−0.9% (−2.4; −0.6), P = 0.25] between groups. There were no regional differences between groups. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Conclusion In heart failure, patients with LBBB, BiV-CRT, and His-CRT have comparable effects with regard to improvements in mechanical dyssynchrony and longitudinal contractile function.

KW - 2D speckle tracking

KW - biventricular pacing

KW - cardiac resynchronization therapy

KW - heart failure

KW - His-bundle pacing

KW - left bundle branch block

U2 - 10.1093/ehjci/jead181

DO - 10.1093/ehjci/jead181

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 37490036

AN - SCOPUS:85181178052

VL - 25

SP - 66

EP - 74

JO - European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging

JF - European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging

SN - 2047-2404

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 381722370