Left atrial appendage occlusion in chicken-wing anatomies: Imaging assessment, procedural, and clinical outcomes of the “sandwich technique”

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

  • Xavier Freixa
  • Apostolos Tzikas
  • Adel Aminian
  • Eduardo Flores-Umanzor
  • De Backer, Ole
  • Kasper Korsholm
  • Mohamed Ben Yedder
  • Rocío Gonzalez-Ferreiro
  • Victor Agudelo-Montañez
  • Thomas Gilhofer
  • François Simon
  • Athanasios Samaras
  • Ander Regueiro
  • Søndergaard, Lars
  • Ignacio Cruz-Gonzalez
  • Dabit Arzamendi
  • Jacqueline Saw
  • Reda Ibrahim
  • Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk

Objectives: To describe imaging assessment, procedural and follow-up outcome of patients undergoing left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion (LAAO) using a “sandwich” technique. Background: The presence of a LAA with chicken wing morphology constitutes a challenge that sometimes requires specific occlusion strategies like the “sandwich” technique. However, procedural and follow-up data focusing on this implanting strategy is scarce. Methods: This multicenter study collected individual data from eight centers between 2012 and 2019. Consecutive patients with chicken-wing LAAs defined as an early (<20 mm from the ostium) and severe bend (>90°) who underwent LAAO with Amplatzer devices and using the “sandwich” technique were included in the analysis. Results: Overall, 190 subjects were enrolled in the study. Procedures were done with the Amulet device (85%) and the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (15%). Successful implantation was achieved in 99.5% with ≤1 partial recapture in 80% of cases. Single (46.2%) and dual antiplatelet therapy (39.4%) were the most used antithrombotic therapies after LAAO. In-hospital major adverse events rate was 1.5% with no deaths. One patient (0.5%) had cardiac tamponade requiring percutaneous drainage. With a mean follow-up of 19.6 ± 14.8 months, the mortality and stroke rates were 7.7%/year and 2.5%/year, respectively. Follow-up transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) at 2–3 months showed device-related thrombosis in 2.8% and peri-device leak ≥3 mm in 1.2% of patients. Conclusions: In a large series of patients with chicken wing LAA anatomies undergoing LAAO, the use of the “sandwich” technique was feasible and safe. Preprocedural imaging was a key-factor to determine specific measurements.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Vol/bind97
Udgave nummer7
Sider (fra-til)E1025-E1032
ISSN1522-1946
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2021

Bibliografisk note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

ID: 303673584