The impact of a csDMARD in combination with a TNF inhibitor on drug retention and clinical remission in axial spondyloarthritis

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Accepteret manuskript, 563 KB, PDF-dokument

  • Michael Nissen
  • Bénédicte Delcoigne
  • Daniela Di Giuseppe
  • Lennart Jacobsson
  • Adrian Ciurea
  • Lucie Nekvindova
  • Florenzo Iannone
  • Nurullah Akkoc
  • Tuulikki Sokka-Isler
  • Karen Minde Fagerli
  • Maria Jose Santos
  • Catalin Codreanu
  • Manuel Pombo-Suarez
  • Ziga Rotar
  • Bjorn Gudbjornsson
  • Irene van der Horst-Bruinsma
  • Anne Gitte Loft
  • Burkhard Möller
  • Herman Mann
  • Fabrizio Conti
  • Gozde Yildirim Cetin
  • Heikki Relas
  • Brigitte Michelsen
  • Pedro Avila Ribeiro
  • Ruxandra Ionescu
  • Carlos Sanchez-Piedra
  • Matija Tomsic
  • Árni Jón Geirsson
  • Johan Askling
  • Ulf Lindström

OBJECTIVES: Many axial spondylarthritis (axSpA) patients receive a conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) in combination with a TNF inhibitor (TNFi). However, the value of this co-therapy remains unclear. The objectives were to describe the characteristics of axSpA patients initiating a first TNFi as monotherapy compared with co-therapy with csDMARD, to compare one-year TNFi retention and remission rates, and to explore the impact of peripheral arthritis. METHODS: Data was collected from 13 European registries. One-year outcomes included TNFi retention and hazard ratios (HR) for discontinuation with 95% CIs. Logistic regression was performed with adjusted odds ratios (OR) of achieving remission (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)-CRP < 1.3 and/or BASDAI < 2) and stratified by treatment. Inter-registry heterogeneity was assessed using random-effect meta-analyses, combined results were presented when heterogeneity was not significant. Peripheral arthritis was defined as ≥1 swollen joint at baseline (=TNFi start). RESULTS: Amongst 24 171 axSpA patients, 32% received csDMARD co-therapy (range across countries: 13.5% to 71.2%). The co-therapy group had more baseline peripheral arthritis and higher CRP than the monotherapy group. One-year TNFi-retention rates (95% CI): 79% (78, 79%) for TNFi monotherapy vs 82% (81, 83%) with co-therapy (P < 0.001). Remission was obtained in 20% on monotherapy and 22% on co-therapy (P < 0.001); adjusted OR of 1.16 (1.07, 1.25). Remission rates at 12 months were similar in patients with/without peripheral arthritis. CONCLUSION: This large European study of axial SpA patients showed similar one-year treatment outcomes for TNFi monotherapy and csDMARD co-therapy, although considerable heterogeneity across countries limited the identification of certain subgroups (e.g. peripheral arthritis) that may benefit from co-therapy.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftRheumatology
Vol/bind61
Udgave nummer12
Sider (fra-til)4741-4751
Antal sider11
ISSN1462-0324
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2022

Bibliografisk note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

ID: 329304016