Efficacy of a glucagon-like peptide-1 agonist and restrictive versus liberal oxygen supply in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting or aortic valve replacement: Study protocol for a 2-by-2 factorial designed, randomised clinical trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Forlagets udgivne version, 384 KB, PDF-dokument

Introduction Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and/or aortic valve replacement (AVR) are associated with risk of death, as well as brain, heart and kidney injury. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues are approved for treatment of type 2 diabetes, and GLP-1 analogues have been suggested to have potential organ-protective and anti-inflammatory effects. During cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), consensus on the optimal fraction of oxygen is lacking. The objective of this study is to determine the efficacy of the GLP-1-analogue exenatide versus placebo and restrictive oxygenation (50% fractional inspired oxygen, FiO2) versus liberal oxygenation (100% FiO2) in patients undergoing open heart surgery. Methods and analysis A randomised, placebo-controlled, double blind (for the exenatide intervention)/single blind (for the oxygenation strategy), 2×2 factorial designed single-centre trial on adult patients undergoing elective or subacute CABG and/or surgical AVR. Patients will be randomised in a 1:1 and 1:1 ratio to a 6-hour and 15 min infusion of 17.4 μg of exenatide or placebo during CPB and to a FiO2 of 50% or 100% during and after weaning from CPB. Patients will be followed until 12 months after inclusion of the last participant. The primary composite endpoint consists of time to first event of death, renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy, hospitalisation for stroke or heart failure. In addition, the trial will include predefined sub-studies applying more advanced measures of cardiac- A nd pulmonary dysfunction, renal dysfunction and cerebral dysfunction. The trial is event driven and aims at 323 primary endpoints with a projected inclusion of 1400 patients. Ethics and dissemination Eligible patients will provide informed, written consent prior to randomisation. The trial is approved by the local ethics committee and is conducted in accordance with Danish legislation and the Declaration of Helsinki. The results will be presented in peer-reviewed journals.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummere052340
TidsskriftBMJ Open
Vol/bind11
Udgave nummer11
ISSN2044-6055
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2021

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
Funding This work was supported by: Læge Sofus Carl Emil Friis og Hustru Olga Doris Friis' Legat. 2017 (DKR461 180), Aase og Ejnar Danielsens Fond 2017, grant no. 10-001 976 (DKR200 000), Danish Heart Foundation 2019, Grant number 19-R133-A9174-22144 (DKR1 000 000), The Heart Centre Research Foundation 2017, (DKR160 000), Lundbeck Foundation (R186-2015-2132).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Author(s). Published by BMJ.

ID: 304078176