Simulation-based education in anaesthesiology residency training in Europe: A survey-based cross-sectional study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

  • Igor Abramovich
  • Iulia Crisan
  • Olivia Dow
  • Diogo Morais
  • Stefan De Hert
  • Østergaard, Doris
  • Joana Berger-Estilita
  • Anne Blank
Background
Simulation-based medical education (SBME) is an important tool for actively improving the skills and knowledge of healthcare professionals. Despite the growing popularity and proven effectiveness of simulation-based education, understanding the extent and scope of its use in European anaesthesiology residency training is necessary. This study aimed to evaluate the current status of simulation-based training for anaesthesiology trainees in Europe.

Methods
We conducted a survey-based cross-sectional study to assess the current status of simulation-based education in anaesthesiology residency training in Europe. The online distributed survey included 56 items, aiming at trainees’ perspectives of availability in general and different types of SBME, implementation in national training programs, benefits and barriers. Regional, year of-training-dependent and workplace-associated distribution patterns of answers were analysed.

Results
We collected responses from 268 anaesthesiology trainees from 37 different countries. Most trainees had participated in an anaesthesia-related simulation course, with the highest response rate in northern and western European countries. Anaesthesia-related simulation courses were included in the training programs of almost all respondents, regardless of the region, but perceptive availability varied significantly throughout Europe. The most taught topics using simulation included advanced/basic life support, airway management and management of polytrauma patients. The most frequently reported barriers to simulation were costs, followed by a need for more protected educational time.

Conclusion
The study revealed discrepancies between the European countries as perceived by trainees. Further research is needed to explore the reasons behind these differences and promote greater access to simulation-based education across Europe.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer101310
TidsskriftTrends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care
Vol/bind53
Antal sider9
ISSN2210-8440
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2023

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
Assistance with the article: We thank all members of the past and present ESAIC Simulation and Trainees Committee who supported this study. Our special thanks go to Alex Rawlings for organisational linguistic support. Financial support and sponsorship: The Simulation Committee and the Trainees Committee of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) supported the survey.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd

ID: 373974381