Ropeginterferon alfa-2b versus standard therapy for polycythaemia vera (PROUD-PV and CONTINUATION-PV): a randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial and its extension study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

  • Heinz Gisslinger
  • Christoph Klade
  • Pencho Georgiev
  • Dorota Krochmalczyk
  • Liana Gercheva-Kyuchukova
  • Miklos Egyed
  • Viktor Rossiev
  • Petr Dulicek
  • Arpad Illes
  • Halyna Pylypenko
  • Lylia Sivcheva
  • Jiri Mayer
  • Vera Yablokova
  • Kurt Krejcy
  • Barbara Grohmann-Izay
  • Robert Kralovics
  • Jean Jacques Kiladjian
  • Franz Bauer
  • Nicoleta Berbec
  • Carlos Besses Raebel
  • Zita Borbenyi
  • Horia Bumbea
  • Veronika Buxhofer-Ausch
  • Malgorzata Calbecka
  • Emilie Cayssials-Caylus
  • Mario Cazzola
  • Olga Cerna
  • Andrei Cucuianu
  • Delia Monica Dima
  • Ernst Forjan
  • Emanuil Gheorghita
  • Richard Greil
  • Antonia Hatalova
  • Mikulas Hrubisko
  • Janos Jakucs
  • Polina Kaplan
  • Sergiy Klymenko
  • Steffen Koschmieder
  • Mihaela Lazaroiu
  • Tamila Lysa
  • Zvenyslava Masliak
  • Tamas Masszi
  • Georgi Mihaylov
  • Alexander Myasnikov
  • Uwe Platzbecker
  • Mathieu Puyade
  • Jerome Rey
  • Lydia Roy
  • Jiri Schwarz
  • Aleksander Skotnicki
  • Irina Sokolova
  • Maria Soroka-Wojtaszko
  • Jolanta Starzak-Gwozdz
  • Vera Stoeva
  • Jose Miguel Torregrosa-Diaz
  • Anna Vallova
  • Elena Volodicheva
  • Krzysztof Warzocha
  • Ella Willenbacher
  • Dominik Wolf

Background: The PROUD-PV and CONTINUATION-PV trials aimed to compare the novel monopegylated interferon ropeginterferon alfa-2b with hydroxyurea, the standard therapy for patients with polycythaemia vera, over 3 years of treatment. Methods: PROUD-PV and its extension study, CONTINUATION-PV, were phase 3, randomised, controlled, open-label, trials done in 48 clinics in Europe. Patients were eligible if 18 years or older with early stage polycythaemia vera (no history of cytoreductive treatment or less than 3 years of previous hydroxyurea treatment) diagnosed by WHO's 2008 criteria. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to ropeginterferon alfa-2b (subcutaneously every 2 weeks, starting at 100 μg) or hydroxyurea (orally starting at 500 mg/day). After 1 year, patients could opt to enter the extension part of the trial, CONTINUATION-PV. The primary endpoint in PROUD-PV was non-inferiority of ropeginterferon alfa-2b versus hydroxyurea regarding complete haematological response with normal spleen size (longitudinal diameter of ≤12 cm for women and ≤13 cm for men) at 12 months; in CONTINUATION-PV, the coprimary endpoints were complete haematological response with normalisation of spleen size and with improved disease burden (ie, splenomegaly, microvascular disturbances, pruritus, and headache). We present the final results of PROUD-PV and an interim analysis at 36 months of the CONTINUATION-PV study (per statistical analysis plan). Analyses for safety and efficacy were per-protocol. The trials were registered on EudraCT, 2012-005259-18 (PROUD-PV) and 2014-001357-17 (CONTINUATION-PV, which is ongoing). Findings: Patients were recruited from Sept 17, 2013 to March 13, 2015 with 306 enrolled. 257 patients were randomly assigned, 127 were treated in each group (three patients withdrew consent in the hydroxyurea group), and 171 rolled over to the CONTINUATION-PV trial. Median follow-up was 182·1 weeks (IQR 166·3–201·7) in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b and 164·5 weeks (144·4–169·3) in the standard therapy group. In PROUD-PV, 26 (21%) of 122 patients in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b group and 34 (28%) of 123 patients in the standard therapy group met the composite primary endpoint of complete haematological response with normal spleen size. In CONTINUATION-PV, complete haematological response with improved disease burden was met in 50 (53%) of 95 patients in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b group versus 28 (38%) of 74 patients in the hydroxyurea group, p=0·044 at 36 months. Complete haematological response without the spleen criterion in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b group versus standard therapy group were: 53 (43%) of 123 patients versus 57 (46%) of 125 patients, p=0·63 at 12 months (PROUD-PV), and 67 (71%) of 95 patients versus 38 (51%) of 74 patients, p=0·012 at 36 months (CONTINUATION-PV). The most frequently reported grade 3 and grade 4 treatment-related adverse events were increased γ-glutamyltransferase (seven [6%] of 127 patients) and increased alanine aminotransferase (four [3%] of 127 patients) in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b group, and leucopenia (six [5%] of 127 patients) and thrombocytopenia (five [4%] of 127 patients) in the standard therapy group. Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in three (2%) of 127 patients in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b group and five (4%) of 127 patients in the hydroxyurea group. One treatment-related death was reported in the standard therapy group (acute leukaemia). Interpretation: In patients with early polycythaemia vera, who predominantly presented without splenomegaly, ropeginterferon alfa-2b was effective in inducing haematological responses; non-inferiority to hydroxyurea regarding haematological response and normal spleen size was not shown at 12 months. However, response to ropeginterferon alfa-2b continued to increase over time with improved responses compared with hydroxyurea at 36 months. Considering the high and durable haematological and molecular responses and its good tolerability, ropeginterferon alfa-2b offers a valuable and safe long-term treatment option with features distinct from hydroxyurea. Funding: AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftThe Lancet Haematology
Vol/bind7
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)e196-e208
Antal sider13
ISSN2352-3026
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2020

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
HG contributed to the study design, collection of clinical data, analysis, and interpretation of data, and the drafting and editing of the manuscript. CK, KK, BG-I, and J-JK contributed to the study design, analysis, interpretation of data, and preparation of the manuscript. PG, DK, LG-K, ME, VR, PD, AI, HP, LS, JM, VY, J-JK, and the PROUD-PV Study Group collected clinical data. RK provided critical analytical tools, oversaw analyses, and interpreted the data. HCH contributed to interpretation of the data and preparation of the manuscript. We received editorial support from a medical writer funded by AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG.

Funding Information:
HG reports grants and personal fees from AOP Orphan during the conduct of the studies; grants and personal fees from Novartis and personal fees from PharmaEssentia, MyeloPro Diagnostics and Research, Janssen-Cilag, Roche, and Celgene, outside of the work. CK, KK, and BG-I report that they were employees of AOP Orphan during the studies. JM reports grants from AOP Orphan during studies. RK reports personal fees from AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals and PharmaEssentia, during the studies; personal fees from Qiagen and Novartis and stock ownership in MyeloPro Diagnostics and Research, outside of the work. HCH reports Data Monitoring Board honoraria from AOP Orphan during the studies; grants from Novartis outside of the work. J-JK reports grants and personal fees from AOP Orphan during the studies; grants and personal fees from Novartis and personal fees from Celgene, outside of the work. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Funding Information:
The study was funded by AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG. Editorial assistance was provided by Victoria Empson, a medical writer funded by AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd

ID: 269595215