Consensus on international guidelines for management of groin hernias

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

  • Nadine van Veenendaal
  • Maarten Simons
  • William Hope
  • Sathien Tumtavitikul
  • Jaap Bonjer
  • Theo Aufenacker
  • Fredrik Berrevoet
  • Julia Bingener
  • Thue Bisgaard
  • Reinhard Bittner
  • Kamil Bury
  • Giampiero Campanelli
  • David Chen
  • Pradeep Chowbey
  • Joachim Conze
  • Diego Cuccurullo
  • Andrew De Beaux
  • Hasan Eker
  • Robert Fitzgibbons
  • Rene Fortelny
  • Jean Francois Gillion
  • Baukje Van den Heuvel
  • Jørgensen, Lars Nannestad
  • Uwe Klinge
  • Ferdinand Köckerling
  • Jan Kukleta
  • Ibrahima Konate
  • Liong Liem
  • Davide Lomanto
  • Maarten Loos
  • Manuel Lopez-Cano
  • Marc Miserez
  • Mahesh Misra
  • Agneta Montgomery
  • Salvador Morales-Conde
  • Filip Muysoms
  • Henning Niebuhr
  • Par Nordin
  • Maciej Pawlak
  • Gabrielle Van Ramshorst
  • Wolfgang Reinpold
  • David Sanders
  • Rachid Sani
  • Nelleke Schouten
  • Sam Smedberg
  • Maciej Smietanski
  • Rogier Simmermacher
  • Hanh Tran
  • Arthur Wijsmuller
  • The HerniaSurge Group

Background: Groin hernia management has a significant worldwide diversity with multiple surgical techniques and variable outcomes. The International guidelines for groin hernia management serve to help in groin hernia management, but the acceptance among general surgeons remains unknown. The aim of our study was to gauge the degree of agreement with the guidelines among health care professionals worldwide. Methods: Forty-six key statements and recommendations of the International guidelines for groin hernia management were selected and presented at plenary consensus conferences at four international congresses in Europe, the America’s and Asia. Participants could cast their votes through live voting. Additionally, a web survey was sent out to all society members allowing online voting after each congress. Consensus was defined as > 70% agreement among all participants. Results: In total 822 surgeons cast their vote on the key statements and recommendations during the four plenary consensus meetings or via the web survey. Consensus was reached on 34 out of 39 (87%) recommendations, and on six out of seven (86%) statements. No consensus was reached on the use of light versus heavy-weight meshes (69%), superior cost-effectiveness of day-case laparo-endoscopic repair (69%), omitting prophylactic antibiotics in hernia repair, general or local versus regional anesthesia in elderly patients (55%) and re-operation in case of immediate postoperative pain (59%). Conclusion: Globally, there is 87% consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of groin hernias. This provides a solid basis for standardizing the care path of patients with groin hernias.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftSurgical Endoscopy
Vol/bind34
Udgave nummer6
Sider (fra-til)2359-2377
Antal sider19
ISSN0930-2794
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2020

ID: 260359695