Pathology of Breast and Ovarian Cancers among BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: Results from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA)

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

  • Nasim Mavaddat
  • Daniel Barrowdale
  • Irene L Andrulis
  • Susan M Domchek
  • Diana Eccles
  • Heli Nevanlinna
  • Susan J Ramus
  • Amanda Spurdle
  • Mark Robson
  • Mark Sherman
  • Anna Marie Mulligan
  • Fergus J Couch
  • Christoph Engel
  • Lesley McGuffog
  • Sue Healey
  • Olga M Sinilnikova
  • Melissa C Southey
  • Mary Beth Terry
  • David Goldgar
  • Frances O'Malley
  • Esther M John
  • Ramunas Janavicius
  • Laima Tihomirova
  • Thomas V O Hansen
  • Nielsen, Finn Cilius
  • Ana Osorio
  • Alexandra Stavropoulou
  • Javier Benítez
  • Siranoush Manoukian
  • Bernard Peissel
  • Monica Barile
  • Sara Volorio
  • Barbara Pasini
  • Riccardo Dolcetti
  • Anna Laura Putignano
  • Laura Ottini
  • Paolo Radice
  • Ute Hamann
  • Muhammad U Rashid
  • Frans B Hogervorst
  • Mieke Kriege
  • Rob B van der Luijt
  • Susan Peock
  • Debra Frost
  • D Gareth Evans
  • Carole Brewer
  • Lisa Walker
  • Mark T Rogers
  • Lucy E Side
  • Gerdes, Anne-Marie Axø
  • for HEBON
BACKGROUND: Previously, small studies have found that BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast tumors differ in their pathology. Analysis of larger datasets of mutation carriers should allow further tumor characterization. METHODS: We used data from 4,325 BRCA1 and 2,568 BRCA2 mutation carriers to analyze the pathology of invasive breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancers. RESULTS: There was strong evidence that the proportion of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast tumors decreased with age at diagnosis among BRCA1 (P-trend = 1.2 × 10(-5)), but increased with age at diagnosis among BRCA2, carriers (P-trend = 6.8 × 10(-6)). The proportion of triple-negative tumors decreased with age at diagnosis in BRCA1 carriers but increased with age at diagnosis of BRCA2 carriers. In both BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, ER-negative tumors were of higher histologic grade than ER-positive tumors (grade 3 vs. grade 1; P = 1.2 × 10(-13) for BRCA1 and P = 0.001 for BRCA2). ER and progesterone receptor (PR) expression were independently associated with mutation carrier status [ER-positive odds ratio (OR) for BRCA2 = 9.4, 95% CI: 7.0-12.6 and PR-positive OR = 1.7, 95% CI: 1.3-2.3, under joint analysis]. Lobular tumors were more likely to be BRCA2-related (OR for BRCA2 = 3.3, 95% CI: 2.4-4.4; P = 4.4 × 10(-14)), and medullary tumors BRCA1-related (OR for BRCA2 = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.18-0.35; P = 2.3 × 10(-15)). ER-status of the first breast cancer was predictive of ER-status of asynchronous contralateral breast cancer (P = 0.0004 for BRCA1; P = 0.002 for BRCA2). There were no significant differences in ovarian cancer morphology between BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers (serous: 67%; mucinous: 1%; endometrioid: 12%; clear-cell: 2%). Conclusions/Impact: Pathologic characteristics of BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumors may be useful for improving risk-prediction algorithms and informing clinical strategies for screening and prophylaxis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 21(1); 134-47. ©2011 AACR.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Vol/bind21
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)134-147
Antal sider14
ISSN1055-9965
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2012

ID: 40153838