Benefit of pazopanib in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours: results from a phase II trial (SSG XXI, PAGIST)

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Forlagets udgivne version, 329 KB, PDF-dokument

  • M. Eriksson
  • P. Reichardt
  • H. Joensuu
  • Krarup-Hansen, Anders
  • O. Hagberg
  • P. Hohenberger
  • H Hagberg
  • L. Hansson
  • T. Foukakis
  • K. Pulkkanen
  • S. Bauer
  • D. Goplen
  • P. Blach Rossen
  • K. Sundby Hall

Background: Patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) resistant to the tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib and sunitinib may be treated with regorafenib, which resulted in a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.8 months in the GRID trial. Also, pazopanib, another tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been studied in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial (PAZOGIST) in the third line, which showed a PFS of 45.2% 4 months after study entry, but patients intolerant to sunitinib were also included. We designed another trial evaluating pazopanib, enrolling only patients with progression on both imatinib and sunitinib. Patients and methods: Since all eligible patients had progressive disease, we preferred a non-randomized, phase II multicentre trial so that all patients could receive a potentially active drug. Patients had a progressive metastatic or locally advanced GIST and were ≥18 years of age, with a performance status of 0-2, and sufficient organ functions. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (defined as complete remission + partial remission + stable disease) at 12 weeks on pazopanib. A Simon's two-stage analysis was used with an interim analysis 12 weeks after enrollment of the first 22 patients, and if passed, there was a full enrolment of 72 patients. GIST mutational analysis was done, and most patients had pazopanib plasma concentration measured after 12 weeks. Results: Seventy-two patients were enrolled. The disease control rate after 12 weeks was 44%, and the median PFS was 19.6 weeks (95% confidence interval 12.6-23.4 weeks). Pazopanib-related toxicity was moderate and manageable. No statistically significant differences were found related to mutations. Plasma concentrations of pazopanib had a formal but weak correlation with outcome. Conclusion: Pazopanib given in the third line to patients with GIST progressing on both imatinib and sunitinib was beneficial for about half of the patients. The PAGIST trial confirms the results from the PAZOGIST trial, and the median PFS achieved seems comparable to the PFS achieved with regorafenib in the third-line setting.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer100217
TidsskriftESMO Open
Vol/bind6
Udgave nummer4
Antal sider6
ISSN2059-7029
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2021

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
This work was supported by the pharmaceutical company GlaxoSmithKline and included free drug and economical support, which was later taken over by Novartis since the drug changed owner (no grant number).

Funding Information:
The authors thank Eva-Mari Olofsson and Jeanette Ceberg for eminent administrative assistance. This work was supported by the pharmaceutical company GlaxoSmithKline and included free drug and economical support, which was later taken over by Novartis since the drug changed owner (no grant number). ME is a consultant for Blueprint Medicines and has participated in advisory boards for Clinigen and Bayer. He is a trial physician in the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group, which receives trial support from Novartis. PR reports advisory roles for Bayer, Clinigen, Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Deciphera, PharmaMar, Mundibiopharma, and Blueprint, and speaker's honoraria from Lilly and PharmaMar. HJ reports being Chair of the Scientific Advisory Boards for Maud Kuistila Foundation, Neutron Therapeutics, and Orion Pharma. He also reports a full-time or part-time employment at Orion Pharma until 31 August 2020. He owns stocks/shares in Orion Pharma and Sartar Therapeutics. SB reports personal fees from Deciphera, Lilly, Daichii-Sankyo, Plexxikon, Exelixis, Bayer, PharmaMar, Roche, and GlaxoSmithKline. He reports grants and personal fees from Blueprint Medicines and Novartis. He reports grants from Incyte, and other support from Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors

ID: 301631315