UV1 telomerase vaccine with ipilimumab and nivolumab as second line treatment for pleural mesothelioma – A phase II randomised trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

UV1 telomerase vaccine with ipilimumab and nivolumab as second line treatment for pleural mesothelioma – A phase II randomised trial. / Haakensen, Vilde Drageset; Öjlert, Åsa Kristina; Thunold, Solfrid; Farooqi, Saima; Nowak, Anna K.; Chin, Wee L.; Grundberg, Oscar; Szejniuk, Weronika Maria; Cedres, Susana; Sørensen, Jens Benn; Dalen, Tonje Sofie; Lund-Iversen, Marius; Bjaanæs, Maria; Helland, Åslaug.

I: European Journal of Cancer, Bind 202, 113973, 2024.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Haakensen, VD, Öjlert, ÅK, Thunold, S, Farooqi, S, Nowak, AK, Chin, WL, Grundberg, O, Szejniuk, WM, Cedres, S, Sørensen, JB, Dalen, TS, Lund-Iversen, M, Bjaanæs, M & Helland, Å 2024, 'UV1 telomerase vaccine with ipilimumab and nivolumab as second line treatment for pleural mesothelioma – A phase II randomised trial', European Journal of Cancer, bind 202, 113973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2024.113973

APA

Haakensen, V. D., Öjlert, Å. K., Thunold, S., Farooqi, S., Nowak, A. K., Chin, W. L., Grundberg, O., Szejniuk, W. M., Cedres, S., Sørensen, J. B., Dalen, T. S., Lund-Iversen, M., Bjaanæs, M., & Helland, Å. (2024). UV1 telomerase vaccine with ipilimumab and nivolumab as second line treatment for pleural mesothelioma – A phase II randomised trial. European Journal of Cancer, 202, [113973]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2024.113973

Vancouver

Haakensen VD, Öjlert ÅK, Thunold S, Farooqi S, Nowak AK, Chin WL o.a. UV1 telomerase vaccine with ipilimumab and nivolumab as second line treatment for pleural mesothelioma – A phase II randomised trial. European Journal of Cancer. 2024;202. 113973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2024.113973

Author

Haakensen, Vilde Drageset ; Öjlert, Åsa Kristina ; Thunold, Solfrid ; Farooqi, Saima ; Nowak, Anna K. ; Chin, Wee L. ; Grundberg, Oscar ; Szejniuk, Weronika Maria ; Cedres, Susana ; Sørensen, Jens Benn ; Dalen, Tonje Sofie ; Lund-Iversen, Marius ; Bjaanæs, Maria ; Helland, Åslaug. / UV1 telomerase vaccine with ipilimumab and nivolumab as second line treatment for pleural mesothelioma – A phase II randomised trial. I: European Journal of Cancer. 2024 ; Bind 202.

Bibtex

@article{d142ae6c8c20474baf2b0c5e525c9602,
title = "UV1 telomerase vaccine with ipilimumab and nivolumab as second line treatment for pleural mesothelioma – A phase II randomised trial",
abstract = "Purpose: The NIPU-trial investigates the effect of adding the telomerase vaccine UV1 to treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab for patients with pleural mesothelioma (PM). Methods: In this phase 2 open-label trial, patients with PM progressing after first-line chemotherapy were randomised to receive ipilimumab and nivolumab alone (arm B) or combined with UV1 (arm A). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) as determined by BICR. It was estimated that 69 PFS events were needed to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.60 with 80% power and a one-sided alpha level of 0.10. Results: 118 patients were randomised. The median PFS determined by blinded independent central review (BICR) was 4.2 months (95%CI 2.9–9.8) in arm A and 4.7 months (95%CI 3.9–7.0) in arm B (HR 1.01, 80%CI 0.75–1.36 P = 0.979), after a median follow-up of 12.5 months (95%CI 9.7–15.6). The investigator-determined median PFS was 4.3 months (95%CI 3.0–6.8) in arm A and 2.9 months (95%CI 2.4–5.5) in arm B (HR 0.60, 80%CI 0.45–0.81 P = 0.025). Confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by BICR was 31% in arm A and 16% in arm B (odds ratio 2.44 80%CI 1.35–4.49 P = 0.056). After a median follow-up time of 17.3 months (95%CI 15.8–22.9), the OS was 15.4 months (95%CI 11.1–22.6) in arm A and 11.1 months (95%CI 8.8–18.1) in arm B, (HR 0.73, 80%CI 0.53–1.0, P = 0.197). Conclusion: The primary endpoint was not met. Predefined analyses of response rates are in favour of adding the vaccine.",
keywords = "Immunotherapy, Pleural mesothelioma, Telomerase vaccine",
author = "Haakensen, {Vilde Drageset} and {\"O}jlert, {{\AA}sa Kristina} and Solfrid Thunold and Saima Farooqi and Nowak, {Anna K.} and Chin, {Wee L.} and Oscar Grundberg and Szejniuk, {Weronika Maria} and Susana Cedres and S{\o}rensen, {Jens Benn} and Dalen, {Tonje Sofie} and Marius Lund-Iversen and Maria Bjaan{\ae}s and {\AA}slaug Helland",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Authors",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejca.2024.113973",
language = "English",
volume = "202",
journal = "European Journal of Cancer, Supplement",
issn = "0959-8049",
publisher = "Pergamon",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - UV1 telomerase vaccine with ipilimumab and nivolumab as second line treatment for pleural mesothelioma – A phase II randomised trial

AU - Haakensen, Vilde Drageset

AU - Öjlert, Åsa Kristina

AU - Thunold, Solfrid

AU - Farooqi, Saima

AU - Nowak, Anna K.

AU - Chin, Wee L.

AU - Grundberg, Oscar

AU - Szejniuk, Weronika Maria

AU - Cedres, Susana

AU - Sørensen, Jens Benn

AU - Dalen, Tonje Sofie

AU - Lund-Iversen, Marius

AU - Bjaanæs, Maria

AU - Helland, Åslaug

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Authors

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Purpose: The NIPU-trial investigates the effect of adding the telomerase vaccine UV1 to treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab for patients with pleural mesothelioma (PM). Methods: In this phase 2 open-label trial, patients with PM progressing after first-line chemotherapy were randomised to receive ipilimumab and nivolumab alone (arm B) or combined with UV1 (arm A). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) as determined by BICR. It was estimated that 69 PFS events were needed to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.60 with 80% power and a one-sided alpha level of 0.10. Results: 118 patients were randomised. The median PFS determined by blinded independent central review (BICR) was 4.2 months (95%CI 2.9–9.8) in arm A and 4.7 months (95%CI 3.9–7.0) in arm B (HR 1.01, 80%CI 0.75–1.36 P = 0.979), after a median follow-up of 12.5 months (95%CI 9.7–15.6). The investigator-determined median PFS was 4.3 months (95%CI 3.0–6.8) in arm A and 2.9 months (95%CI 2.4–5.5) in arm B (HR 0.60, 80%CI 0.45–0.81 P = 0.025). Confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by BICR was 31% in arm A and 16% in arm B (odds ratio 2.44 80%CI 1.35–4.49 P = 0.056). After a median follow-up time of 17.3 months (95%CI 15.8–22.9), the OS was 15.4 months (95%CI 11.1–22.6) in arm A and 11.1 months (95%CI 8.8–18.1) in arm B, (HR 0.73, 80%CI 0.53–1.0, P = 0.197). Conclusion: The primary endpoint was not met. Predefined analyses of response rates are in favour of adding the vaccine.

AB - Purpose: The NIPU-trial investigates the effect of adding the telomerase vaccine UV1 to treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab for patients with pleural mesothelioma (PM). Methods: In this phase 2 open-label trial, patients with PM progressing after first-line chemotherapy were randomised to receive ipilimumab and nivolumab alone (arm B) or combined with UV1 (arm A). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) as determined by BICR. It was estimated that 69 PFS events were needed to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.60 with 80% power and a one-sided alpha level of 0.10. Results: 118 patients were randomised. The median PFS determined by blinded independent central review (BICR) was 4.2 months (95%CI 2.9–9.8) in arm A and 4.7 months (95%CI 3.9–7.0) in arm B (HR 1.01, 80%CI 0.75–1.36 P = 0.979), after a median follow-up of 12.5 months (95%CI 9.7–15.6). The investigator-determined median PFS was 4.3 months (95%CI 3.0–6.8) in arm A and 2.9 months (95%CI 2.4–5.5) in arm B (HR 0.60, 80%CI 0.45–0.81 P = 0.025). Confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by BICR was 31% in arm A and 16% in arm B (odds ratio 2.44 80%CI 1.35–4.49 P = 0.056). After a median follow-up time of 17.3 months (95%CI 15.8–22.9), the OS was 15.4 months (95%CI 11.1–22.6) in arm A and 11.1 months (95%CI 8.8–18.1) in arm B, (HR 0.73, 80%CI 0.53–1.0, P = 0.197). Conclusion: The primary endpoint was not met. Predefined analyses of response rates are in favour of adding the vaccine.

KW - Immunotherapy

KW - Pleural mesothelioma

KW - Telomerase vaccine

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.113973

DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.113973

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 38447379

AN - SCOPUS:85186692394

VL - 202

JO - European Journal of Cancer, Supplement

JF - European Journal of Cancer, Supplement

SN - 0959-8049

M1 - 113973

ER -

ID: 385687208