Preparing for obstetric anaesthesia - An educational randomised controlled trial comparing e-learning to written course material

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Preparing for obstetric anaesthesia - An educational randomised controlled trial comparing e-learning to written course material. / Andersson, Mette Legaard; Duch, Patricia; Bessmann, Ebbe Lahn; Lundstrøm, Lars Hyldborg; Ekelund, Kim.

In: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, Vol. 67, No. 1, 2023, p. 36-43.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Andersson, ML, Duch, P, Bessmann, EL, Lundstrøm, LH & Ekelund, K 2023, 'Preparing for obstetric anaesthesia - An educational randomised controlled trial comparing e-learning to written course material', Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14148

APA

Andersson, M. L., Duch, P., Bessmann, E. L., Lundstrøm, L. H., & Ekelund, K. (2023). Preparing for obstetric anaesthesia - An educational randomised controlled trial comparing e-learning to written course material. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 67(1), 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14148

Vancouver

Andersson ML, Duch P, Bessmann EL, Lundstrøm LH, Ekelund K. Preparing for obstetric anaesthesia - An educational randomised controlled trial comparing e-learning to written course material. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2023;67(1):36-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14148

Author

Andersson, Mette Legaard ; Duch, Patricia ; Bessmann, Ebbe Lahn ; Lundstrøm, Lars Hyldborg ; Ekelund, Kim. / Preparing for obstetric anaesthesia - An educational randomised controlled trial comparing e-learning to written course material. In: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2023 ; Vol. 67, No. 1. pp. 36-43.

Bibtex

@article{5b522f868af8464d8c2347f54027ee52,
title = "Preparing for obstetric anaesthesia - An educational randomised controlled trial comparing e-learning to written course material",
abstract = "Background E-learning is increasingly used in postgraduate medical education. Its numerous benefits include an enhanced learning experience through learning style individualisation, interactive elements, and assessment through tests and quizzes. Current meta-analyses conclude that the overall effectiveness of e-learning is comparable to traditional teaching modalities. However, studies demonstrating its benefits are heterogeneous and of varying quality. This randomised controlled trial aims to investigate whether contemporary e-learning completed prior to a course in obstetric anaesthesia prepares the course participants better than self-study of written course material. Methods A randomised controlled trial allocated second-year resident anaesthetists to receive either e-learning in postpartum haemorrhage and written course material in preeclampsia or e-learning in preeclampsia and written course material in postpartum haemorrhage, prior to a compulsory course in obstetric anaesthesia. The primary outcome was knowledge after completion of e-learning before the course, assessed by type X multiple-choice questions with a score ranging from zero to 35. The secondary outcomes were anxiety level before course simulations, performance during course simulations, and knowledge four and 12 weeks after the course. Results The per protocol analysis of the primary outcome included 45 participants and demonstrated a mean difference of 1.8 (95% CI 0.7-2.9; p = .002) in knowledge after completion of e-learning before the course, in favour of e-learning compared to written course material. There were no statistically significant differences in the secondary outcomes. Conclusion This blinded parallel group randomised controlled trial found a numerically small but statistically significant difference in knowledge favouring e-learning over written course material.",
keywords = "E-learning, medical education, obstetric anaesthesia, HEALTH-PROFESSIONS, 12 TIPS, SIMULATION, PERFORMANCE, VALIDITY, SUPPORT, RATINGS, STRESS, SCALES, IMPACT",
author = "Andersson, {Mette Legaard} and Patricia Duch and Bessmann, {Ebbe Lahn} and Lundstr{\o}m, {Lars Hyldborg} and Kim Ekelund",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1111/aas.14148",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "36--43",
journal = "Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica",
issn = "0001-5172",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preparing for obstetric anaesthesia - An educational randomised controlled trial comparing e-learning to written course material

AU - Andersson, Mette Legaard

AU - Duch, Patricia

AU - Bessmann, Ebbe Lahn

AU - Lundstrøm, Lars Hyldborg

AU - Ekelund, Kim

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Background E-learning is increasingly used in postgraduate medical education. Its numerous benefits include an enhanced learning experience through learning style individualisation, interactive elements, and assessment through tests and quizzes. Current meta-analyses conclude that the overall effectiveness of e-learning is comparable to traditional teaching modalities. However, studies demonstrating its benefits are heterogeneous and of varying quality. This randomised controlled trial aims to investigate whether contemporary e-learning completed prior to a course in obstetric anaesthesia prepares the course participants better than self-study of written course material. Methods A randomised controlled trial allocated second-year resident anaesthetists to receive either e-learning in postpartum haemorrhage and written course material in preeclampsia or e-learning in preeclampsia and written course material in postpartum haemorrhage, prior to a compulsory course in obstetric anaesthesia. The primary outcome was knowledge after completion of e-learning before the course, assessed by type X multiple-choice questions with a score ranging from zero to 35. The secondary outcomes were anxiety level before course simulations, performance during course simulations, and knowledge four and 12 weeks after the course. Results The per protocol analysis of the primary outcome included 45 participants and demonstrated a mean difference of 1.8 (95% CI 0.7-2.9; p = .002) in knowledge after completion of e-learning before the course, in favour of e-learning compared to written course material. There were no statistically significant differences in the secondary outcomes. Conclusion This blinded parallel group randomised controlled trial found a numerically small but statistically significant difference in knowledge favouring e-learning over written course material.

AB - Background E-learning is increasingly used in postgraduate medical education. Its numerous benefits include an enhanced learning experience through learning style individualisation, interactive elements, and assessment through tests and quizzes. Current meta-analyses conclude that the overall effectiveness of e-learning is comparable to traditional teaching modalities. However, studies demonstrating its benefits are heterogeneous and of varying quality. This randomised controlled trial aims to investigate whether contemporary e-learning completed prior to a course in obstetric anaesthesia prepares the course participants better than self-study of written course material. Methods A randomised controlled trial allocated second-year resident anaesthetists to receive either e-learning in postpartum haemorrhage and written course material in preeclampsia or e-learning in preeclampsia and written course material in postpartum haemorrhage, prior to a compulsory course in obstetric anaesthesia. The primary outcome was knowledge after completion of e-learning before the course, assessed by type X multiple-choice questions with a score ranging from zero to 35. The secondary outcomes were anxiety level before course simulations, performance during course simulations, and knowledge four and 12 weeks after the course. Results The per protocol analysis of the primary outcome included 45 participants and demonstrated a mean difference of 1.8 (95% CI 0.7-2.9; p = .002) in knowledge after completion of e-learning before the course, in favour of e-learning compared to written course material. There were no statistically significant differences in the secondary outcomes. Conclusion This blinded parallel group randomised controlled trial found a numerically small but statistically significant difference in knowledge favouring e-learning over written course material.

KW - E-learning

KW - medical education

KW - obstetric anaesthesia

KW - HEALTH-PROFESSIONS

KW - 12 TIPS

KW - SIMULATION

KW - PERFORMANCE

KW - VALIDITY

KW - SUPPORT

KW - RATINGS

KW - STRESS

KW - SCALES

KW - IMPACT

U2 - 10.1111/aas.14148

DO - 10.1111/aas.14148

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 36112027

VL - 67

SP - 36

EP - 43

JO - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

JF - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

SN - 0001-5172

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 324367448