Adverse reactions after oral provocation with aluminium in children with vaccination granulomas and aluminium contact allergy
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Adverse reactions after oral provocation with aluminium in children with vaccination granulomas and aluminium contact allergy. / Hoffmann, Stine Skovbo; Elberling, Jesper; Skamstrup Hansen, Kirsten; Thyssen, Jacob P.; Mortz, Charlotte G.; Overgaard Bach, Rasmus; Duus Johansen, Jeanne.
In: Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, Vol. 37, No. 6, 2023, p. 1028-1035.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Adverse reactions after oral provocation with aluminium in children with vaccination granulomas and aluminium contact allergy
AU - Hoffmann, Stine Skovbo
AU - Elberling, Jesper
AU - Skamstrup Hansen, Kirsten
AU - Thyssen, Jacob P.
AU - Mortz, Charlotte G.
AU - Overgaard Bach, Rasmus
AU - Duus Johansen, Jeanne
N1 - This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - BACKGROUND: According to their parents, some children with aluminium contact allergy and vaccination granulomas may react to aluminium-containing foods by developing dermatitis, granuloma itch and subjective symptoms.OBJECTIVES: To determine whether oral intake of aluminium-containing pancakes can cause adverse events and/or systemic contact dermatitis (SCD) in children with vaccination granulomas and aluminium contact allergy.PATIENTS/METHODS: A total of 15 children aged 3-9 years (mean age, 5 years) with vaccination granulomas and positive patch-test results to aluminium chloride hexahydrate 2%/10% pet. completed a 3-week blinded randomized controlled crossover oral aluminium/placebo provocation study with pancakes. Granuloma itch and other subjective symptoms were evaluated daily on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Dermatitis was evaluated by the primary investigator, and sleep patterns were tracked with an electronic device. Aluminium bioavailability was assessed by measuring aluminium excretion in the urine. The children served as their own controls with the placebo provocations.RESULTS: All 15 children completed the study. The mean VAS scores were slightly higher during aluminium provocations compared to placebo for granuloma itch (mean VAS, 1.5 vs 1.4, P = 0.6) but identical for other subjective symptoms (0.6 vs 0.6, P = 1). There were no differences in sleep patterns and no significant correlation between urinary aluminium excretion and symptom severity. Three children developed a symmetrical rash on the face or buttocks on day 4 of the aluminium provocations, but not during placebo provocations.CONCLUSIONS: No difference was found between oral aluminium intake and the occurrence of subjective symptoms and granuloma itch, but on a case-basis oral aluminium may be associated with the development of systemic contact dermatitis.
AB - BACKGROUND: According to their parents, some children with aluminium contact allergy and vaccination granulomas may react to aluminium-containing foods by developing dermatitis, granuloma itch and subjective symptoms.OBJECTIVES: To determine whether oral intake of aluminium-containing pancakes can cause adverse events and/or systemic contact dermatitis (SCD) in children with vaccination granulomas and aluminium contact allergy.PATIENTS/METHODS: A total of 15 children aged 3-9 years (mean age, 5 years) with vaccination granulomas and positive patch-test results to aluminium chloride hexahydrate 2%/10% pet. completed a 3-week blinded randomized controlled crossover oral aluminium/placebo provocation study with pancakes. Granuloma itch and other subjective symptoms were evaluated daily on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Dermatitis was evaluated by the primary investigator, and sleep patterns were tracked with an electronic device. Aluminium bioavailability was assessed by measuring aluminium excretion in the urine. The children served as their own controls with the placebo provocations.RESULTS: All 15 children completed the study. The mean VAS scores were slightly higher during aluminium provocations compared to placebo for granuloma itch (mean VAS, 1.5 vs 1.4, P = 0.6) but identical for other subjective symptoms (0.6 vs 0.6, P = 1). There were no differences in sleep patterns and no significant correlation between urinary aluminium excretion and symptom severity. Three children developed a symmetrical rash on the face or buttocks on day 4 of the aluminium provocations, but not during placebo provocations.CONCLUSIONS: No difference was found between oral aluminium intake and the occurrence of subjective symptoms and granuloma itch, but on a case-basis oral aluminium may be associated with the development of systemic contact dermatitis.
U2 - 10.1111/jdv.18811
DO - 10.1111/jdv.18811
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 36478462
VL - 37
SP - 1028
EP - 1035
JO - Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
JF - Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
SN - 0926-9959
IS - 6
ER -
ID: 330843082