Effects of canagliflozin versus finerenone on cardiorenal outcomes: exploratory post hoc analyses from FIDELIO-DKD compared to reported CREDENCE results

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

  • Fulltext

    Final published version, 704 KB, PDF document

  • Rajiv Agarwal
  • Stefan D. Anker
  • Gerasimos Filippatos
  • Bertram Pitt
  • Rossing, Peter
  • Luis M. Ruilope
  • John Boletis
  • Robert Toto
  • Guillermo E. Umpierrez
  • Christoph Wanner
  • Takashi Wada
  • Charlie Scott
  • Amer Joseph
  • Ike Ogbaa
  • Luke Roberts
  • Markus F. Scheerer
  • George L. Bakris
  • FIDELIO-DKD Investigators

Background. The nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone and the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i) canagliflozin reduce cardiorenal risk in albuminuric patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). At first glance, the results of Finerenone in Reducing Kidney Failure and Disease Progression in Diabetic Kidney Disease (FIDELIO-DKD) (, NCT02540993) and Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation (CREDENCE) appear disparate. In FIDELIO-DKD, the primary endpoint had an 18% [95% confidence interval (CI) 7-27] relative risk reduction; in CREDENCE, the primary endpoint had a 30% (95% CI 18-41) relative risk reduction. Unlike CREDENCE, the FIDELIO-DKD trial included patients with high albuminuria but excluded patients with symptomatic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The primary endpoint in the FIDELIO-DKD trial was kidney specific and included a sustained decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of >= 40% from baseline. In contrast, the primary endpoint in the CREDENCE trial included a sustained decline in eGFR of >= 57% from baseline and cardiovascular (CV) death. This post hoc exploratory analysis investigated how differences in trial design-inclusion/exclusion criteria and definition of primary outcomes-influenced observed treatment effects.

Methods. Patients from FIDELIO-DKD who met the CKD inclusion criteria of the CREDENCE study (urine albumin: creatinine ratio >300-5000 mg/g and an eGFR of 30-= 57% sustained for >= 4 weeks or renal death). Patients with symptomatic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction were excluded from FIDELIO-DKD. Therefore, in a sensitivity analysis, we further adjusted for the baseline prevalence of heart failure.

Results. Of 4619/5674 (81.4%) patients who met the subgroup inclusion criteria, 49.6% were treated with finerenone and 50.4% received placebo. The rate of the cardiorenal composite endpoint was 43.9/1000 patient-years with finerenone compared with 59.5/1000 patient-years with placebo. The relative risk was significantly reduced by 26% with finerenone versus placebo [hazard ratio (HR) 0.74 (95% CI 0.63-0.87)]. In CREDENCE, the rate of the cardiorenal composite endpoint was 43.2/1000 patient-years with canagliflozin compared with 61.2/1000 patient-years with placebo; a 30% risk reduction was observed with canagliflozin [HR 0.70 (95% CI 0.59-0.82)].

Conclusions. This analysis highlights the pitfalls of direct comparisons between trials. When key differences in trial design are considered, FIDELIO-DKD and CREDENCE demonstrate cardiorenal benefits of a similar magnitude.

Original languageEnglish
JournalNephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Pages (from-to)1261–1269
Number of pages9
ISSN0931-0509
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

    Research areas

  • canagliflozin, cardiorenal, CREDENCE, FIDELIO-DKD, finerenone, CHRONIC KIDNEY-DISEASE, CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES

ID: 304286430