Informed consent procedures in patients with an acute inability to provide informed consent: Policy and practice in the CENTER-TBI study
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Informed consent procedures in patients with an acute inability to provide informed consent : Policy and practice in the CENTER-TBI study. / van Wijk, Roel P.J.; van Dijck, Jeroen T.J.M.; Timmers, Marjolein; van Veen, Ernest; Citerio, Giuseppe; Lingsma, Hester F.; Maas, Andrew I.R.; Menon, David K.; Peul, Wilco C.; Stocchetti, Nino; Kompanje, Erwin J.O.; Åkerlund, Cecilia; Amrein, Krisztina; Andelic, Nada; Andreassen, Lasse; Anke, Audny; Antoni, Anna; Audibert, Gérard; Azouvi, Philippe; Azzolini, Maria Luisa; Bartels, Ronald; Barzó, Pál; Beauvais, Romuald; Beer, Ronny; Bellander, Bo Michael; Belli, Antonio; Benali, Habib; Berardino, Maurizio; Beretta, Luigi; Blaabjerg, Morten; Bragge, Peter; Brazinova, Alexandra; Brinck, Vibeke; Brooker, Joanne; Brorsson, Camilla; Buki, Andras; Bullinger, Monika; Cabeleira, Manuel; Caccioppola, Alessio; Calappi, Emiliana; Calvi, Maria Rosa; Cameron, Peter; Lozano, Guillermo Carbayo; Carbonara, Marco; Cavallo, Simona; Chevallard, Giorgio; Chieregato, Arturo; Fabricius, Martin; Kondziella, Daniel; Nelson, David; The CENTER-TBI investigators and participants.
In: Journal of Critical Care, Vol. 59, 2020, p. 6-15.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Informed consent procedures in patients with an acute inability to provide informed consent
T2 - Policy and practice in the CENTER-TBI study
AU - van Wijk, Roel P.J.
AU - van Dijck, Jeroen T.J.M.
AU - Timmers, Marjolein
AU - van Veen, Ernest
AU - Citerio, Giuseppe
AU - Lingsma, Hester F.
AU - Maas, Andrew I.R.
AU - Menon, David K.
AU - Peul, Wilco C.
AU - Stocchetti, Nino
AU - Kompanje, Erwin J.O.
AU - Åkerlund, Cecilia
AU - Amrein, Krisztina
AU - Andelic, Nada
AU - Andreassen, Lasse
AU - Anke, Audny
AU - Antoni, Anna
AU - Audibert, Gérard
AU - Azouvi, Philippe
AU - Azzolini, Maria Luisa
AU - Bartels, Ronald
AU - Barzó, Pál
AU - Beauvais, Romuald
AU - Beer, Ronny
AU - Bellander, Bo Michael
AU - Belli, Antonio
AU - Benali, Habib
AU - Berardino, Maurizio
AU - Beretta, Luigi
AU - Blaabjerg, Morten
AU - Bragge, Peter
AU - Brazinova, Alexandra
AU - Brinck, Vibeke
AU - Brooker, Joanne
AU - Brorsson, Camilla
AU - Buki, Andras
AU - Bullinger, Monika
AU - Cabeleira, Manuel
AU - Caccioppola, Alessio
AU - Calappi, Emiliana
AU - Calvi, Maria Rosa
AU - Cameron, Peter
AU - Lozano, Guillermo Carbayo
AU - Carbonara, Marco
AU - Cavallo, Simona
AU - Chevallard, Giorgio
AU - Chieregato, Arturo
AU - Fabricius, Martin
AU - Kondziella, Daniel
AU - Nelson, David
AU - The CENTER-TBI investigators and participants
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Purpose: Enrolling traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with an inability to provide informed consent in research is challenging. Alternatives to patient consent are not sufficiently embedded in European and national legislation, which allows procedural variation and bias. We aimed to quantify variations in informed consent policy and practice. Methods: Variation was explored in the CENTER-TBI study. Policies were reported by using a questionnaire and national legislation. Data on used informed consent procedures were available for 4498 patients from 57 centres across 17 European countries. Results: Variation in the use of informed consent procedures was found between and within EU member states. Proxy informed consent (N = 1377;64%) was the most frequently used type of consent in the ICU, followed by patient informed consent (N = 426;20%) and deferred consent (N = 334;16%). Deferred consent was only actively used in 15 centres (26%), although it was considered valid in 47 centres (82%). Conclusions: Alternatives to patient consent are essential for TBI research. While there seems to be concordance amongst national legislations, there is regional variability in institutional practices with respect to the use of different informed consent procedures. Variation could be caused by several reasons, including inconsistencies in clear legislation or knowledge of such legislation amongst researchers.
AB - Purpose: Enrolling traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with an inability to provide informed consent in research is challenging. Alternatives to patient consent are not sufficiently embedded in European and national legislation, which allows procedural variation and bias. We aimed to quantify variations in informed consent policy and practice. Methods: Variation was explored in the CENTER-TBI study. Policies were reported by using a questionnaire and national legislation. Data on used informed consent procedures were available for 4498 patients from 57 centres across 17 European countries. Results: Variation in the use of informed consent procedures was found between and within EU member states. Proxy informed consent (N = 1377;64%) was the most frequently used type of consent in the ICU, followed by patient informed consent (N = 426;20%) and deferred consent (N = 334;16%). Deferred consent was only actively used in 15 centres (26%), although it was considered valid in 47 centres (82%). Conclusions: Alternatives to patient consent are essential for TBI research. While there seems to be concordance amongst national legislations, there is regional variability in institutional practices with respect to the use of different informed consent procedures. Variation could be caused by several reasons, including inconsistencies in clear legislation or knowledge of such legislation amongst researchers.
KW - Ethics
KW - European Union
KW - Informed consent
KW - Traumatic brain injury
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.05.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.05.004
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 32485440
AN - SCOPUS:85085505275
VL - 59
SP - 6
EP - 15
JO - Journal of Critical Care
JF - Journal of Critical Care
SN - 0883-9441
ER -
ID: 255451455