Long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in patients with chronic migraine in whom prior preventive treatments had failed: A subgroup analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in patients with chronic migraine in whom prior preventive treatments had failed : A subgroup analysis. / Ashina, Messoud; Tepper, Stewart J.; Brandes, Jan Lewis; Reuter, Uwe; Boudreau, Guy P.; Weatherall, Mark; Gantenbein, Andreas R; Doležil, David; Klatt, Jan; Wang, Andrea; Karanam, Ananda Krishna; Cheng, Sunfa; Mikol, Daniel D.

In: Headache, Vol. 62, No. 5, 2022, p. 624-633.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Ashina, M, Tepper, SJ, Brandes, JL, Reuter, U, Boudreau, GP, Weatherall, M, Gantenbein, AR, Doležil, D, Klatt, J, Wang, A, Karanam, AK, Cheng, S & Mikol, DD 2022, 'Long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in patients with chronic migraine in whom prior preventive treatments had failed: A subgroup analysis', Headache, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 624-633. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14313

APA

Ashina, M., Tepper, S. J., Brandes, J. L., Reuter, U., Boudreau, G. P., Weatherall, M., Gantenbein, A. R., Doležil, D., Klatt, J., Wang, A., Karanam, A. K., Cheng, S., & Mikol, DD. (2022). Long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in patients with chronic migraine in whom prior preventive treatments had failed: A subgroup analysis. Headache, 62(5), 624-633. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14313

Vancouver

Ashina M, Tepper SJ, Brandes JL, Reuter U, Boudreau GP, Weatherall M et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in patients with chronic migraine in whom prior preventive treatments had failed: A subgroup analysis. Headache. 2022;62(5):624-633. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14313

Author

Ashina, Messoud ; Tepper, Stewart J. ; Brandes, Jan Lewis ; Reuter, Uwe ; Boudreau, Guy P. ; Weatherall, Mark ; Gantenbein, Andreas R ; Doležil, David ; Klatt, Jan ; Wang, Andrea ; Karanam, Ananda Krishna ; Cheng, Sunfa ; Mikol, Daniel D. / Long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in patients with chronic migraine in whom prior preventive treatments had failed : A subgroup analysis. In: Headache. 2022 ; Vol. 62, No. 5. pp. 624-633.

Bibtex

@article{bd6907862c7d4599935c26f84a1fa668,
title = "Long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in patients with chronic migraine in whom prior preventive treatments had failed: A subgroup analysis",
abstract = "Objective: To assess the long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in the subgroup of patients with chronic migraine (CM) in whom prior preventive treatments had failed (TF) (≥1, ≥2, and ≥3 TF medication categories) and never failed (preventive na{\"i}ve or prior preventive treatments had not failed), using the data from a 52-week, open-label treatment period (OLTP) of the parent study. Background: Erenumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to and inhibits the canonical calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor. There are limited long-term data evaluating the efficacy and safety of erenumab in patients with CM in whom prior preventive treatments had failed. Methods: Patients who had completed the 12-week double-blind treatment period (DBTP) in the parent study were eligible to participate in the 52-week OLTP, during which they received erenumab every 4 weeks. The TF subgroups (≥1, ≥2, and ≥3 TF medication categories) were not mutually exclusive; patients in whom prior preventive treatments from ≥3 medication categories had failed were also counted in the ≥2 and ≥1 medication categories. Endpoints included monthly migraine days (MMD), monthly acute migraine-specific medication days (MSMD), achievement of ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% reduction from baseline in MMD, and exposure-adjusted patient incidence rates of adverse events (AEs; per 100 patient-years). Results: Erenumab treatment provided sustained mean reductions in MMD and MSMD relative to the parent study baseline throughout the 52 weeks of the OLTP across all TF subgroups. At Week 52, the mean MMD change was −8.6 (SD 6.6) (baseline: 18.4 [SD 4.5] days) in the ≥1 TF subgroup. A post hoc completer analysis (52 weeks [OLTP] erenumab) showed that compared with erenumab 70 mg, the 140 mg dose was associated with numerically greater reductions in the mean MMD (Week 40: −8.6 and −7.2 days; Week 52: −9.7 and −7.9 days [≥1 TF subgroup]) and a higher proportion of patients achieved ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% response thresholds across all subgroups at Weeks 40 and 52. Overall the exposure-adjusted patient incidence rates of AEs did not increase during the OLTP versus the DBTP (≥1 TF subgroup: 141.9/100 versus 317.9/100 patient-years), and no new safety signals occurred. Conclusion: The long-term treatment with erenumab was well tolerated and showed sustained efficacy in patients with CM in whom prior preventive treatments had failed, with numerically greater treatment effects for 140 mg versus 70 mg.",
keywords = "chronic migraine, erenumab, erenumab-aooe, migraine, preventive treatment",
author = "Messoud Ashina and Tepper, {Stewart J.} and Brandes, {Jan Lewis} and Uwe Reuter and Boudreau, {Guy P.} and Mark Weatherall and Gantenbein, {Andreas R} and David Dole{\v z}il and Jan Klatt and Andrea Wang and Karanam, {Ananda Krishna} and Sunfa Cheng and Daniel D. Mikol",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Headache Society.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1111/head.14313",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "624--633",
journal = "Headache",
issn = "0017-8748",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in patients with chronic migraine in whom prior preventive treatments had failed

T2 - A subgroup analysis

AU - Ashina, Messoud

AU - Tepper, Stewart J.

AU - Brandes, Jan Lewis

AU - Reuter, Uwe

AU - Boudreau, Guy P.

AU - Weatherall, Mark

AU - Gantenbein, Andreas R

AU - Doležil, David

AU - Klatt, Jan

AU - Wang, Andrea

AU - Karanam, Ananda Krishna

AU - Cheng, Sunfa

AU - Mikol, Daniel D.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Headache Society.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Objective: To assess the long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in the subgroup of patients with chronic migraine (CM) in whom prior preventive treatments had failed (TF) (≥1, ≥2, and ≥3 TF medication categories) and never failed (preventive naïve or prior preventive treatments had not failed), using the data from a 52-week, open-label treatment period (OLTP) of the parent study. Background: Erenumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to and inhibits the canonical calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor. There are limited long-term data evaluating the efficacy and safety of erenumab in patients with CM in whom prior preventive treatments had failed. Methods: Patients who had completed the 12-week double-blind treatment period (DBTP) in the parent study were eligible to participate in the 52-week OLTP, during which they received erenumab every 4 weeks. The TF subgroups (≥1, ≥2, and ≥3 TF medication categories) were not mutually exclusive; patients in whom prior preventive treatments from ≥3 medication categories had failed were also counted in the ≥2 and ≥1 medication categories. Endpoints included monthly migraine days (MMD), monthly acute migraine-specific medication days (MSMD), achievement of ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% reduction from baseline in MMD, and exposure-adjusted patient incidence rates of adverse events (AEs; per 100 patient-years). Results: Erenumab treatment provided sustained mean reductions in MMD and MSMD relative to the parent study baseline throughout the 52 weeks of the OLTP across all TF subgroups. At Week 52, the mean MMD change was −8.6 (SD 6.6) (baseline: 18.4 [SD 4.5] days) in the ≥1 TF subgroup. A post hoc completer analysis (52 weeks [OLTP] erenumab) showed that compared with erenumab 70 mg, the 140 mg dose was associated with numerically greater reductions in the mean MMD (Week 40: −8.6 and −7.2 days; Week 52: −9.7 and −7.9 days [≥1 TF subgroup]) and a higher proportion of patients achieved ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% response thresholds across all subgroups at Weeks 40 and 52. Overall the exposure-adjusted patient incidence rates of AEs did not increase during the OLTP versus the DBTP (≥1 TF subgroup: 141.9/100 versus 317.9/100 patient-years), and no new safety signals occurred. Conclusion: The long-term treatment with erenumab was well tolerated and showed sustained efficacy in patients with CM in whom prior preventive treatments had failed, with numerically greater treatment effects for 140 mg versus 70 mg.

AB - Objective: To assess the long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in the subgroup of patients with chronic migraine (CM) in whom prior preventive treatments had failed (TF) (≥1, ≥2, and ≥3 TF medication categories) and never failed (preventive naïve or prior preventive treatments had not failed), using the data from a 52-week, open-label treatment period (OLTP) of the parent study. Background: Erenumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to and inhibits the canonical calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor. There are limited long-term data evaluating the efficacy and safety of erenumab in patients with CM in whom prior preventive treatments had failed. Methods: Patients who had completed the 12-week double-blind treatment period (DBTP) in the parent study were eligible to participate in the 52-week OLTP, during which they received erenumab every 4 weeks. The TF subgroups (≥1, ≥2, and ≥3 TF medication categories) were not mutually exclusive; patients in whom prior preventive treatments from ≥3 medication categories had failed were also counted in the ≥2 and ≥1 medication categories. Endpoints included monthly migraine days (MMD), monthly acute migraine-specific medication days (MSMD), achievement of ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% reduction from baseline in MMD, and exposure-adjusted patient incidence rates of adverse events (AEs; per 100 patient-years). Results: Erenumab treatment provided sustained mean reductions in MMD and MSMD relative to the parent study baseline throughout the 52 weeks of the OLTP across all TF subgroups. At Week 52, the mean MMD change was −8.6 (SD 6.6) (baseline: 18.4 [SD 4.5] days) in the ≥1 TF subgroup. A post hoc completer analysis (52 weeks [OLTP] erenumab) showed that compared with erenumab 70 mg, the 140 mg dose was associated with numerically greater reductions in the mean MMD (Week 40: −8.6 and −7.2 days; Week 52: −9.7 and −7.9 days [≥1 TF subgroup]) and a higher proportion of patients achieved ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% response thresholds across all subgroups at Weeks 40 and 52. Overall the exposure-adjusted patient incidence rates of AEs did not increase during the OLTP versus the DBTP (≥1 TF subgroup: 141.9/100 versus 317.9/100 patient-years), and no new safety signals occurred. Conclusion: The long-term treatment with erenumab was well tolerated and showed sustained efficacy in patients with CM in whom prior preventive treatments had failed, with numerically greater treatment effects for 140 mg versus 70 mg.

KW - chronic migraine

KW - erenumab

KW - erenumab-aooe, migraine

KW - preventive treatment

U2 - 10.1111/head.14313

DO - 10.1111/head.14313

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35593783

AN - SCOPUS:85130263140

VL - 62

SP - 624

EP - 633

JO - Headache

JF - Headache

SN - 0017-8748

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 344427732