A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of prophylactic tranexamic acid treatment in major benign uterine surgery

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Background: The value of tranexamic acid (TA) treatment as bleeding prophylaxis in major uterine surgery is unclear. Objectives: To evaluate the antihemorrhagic effect of prophylactic TA treatment in major benign uterine surgery. Search strategy: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from 1980 to 2015 without language restriction using search terms related to major uterine surgery combined with TA. Selection criteria: Randomized controlled trials comparing prophylactic TA with placebo or no intervention in women undergoing elective major benign uterine surgery. Data collection and analysis: Basic information and outcomes were collected and meta-analyses performed. Main results: Sixteen trials were included, with five trials considered to have an overall low risk of bias. In cesarean delivery, TA significantly reduced intraoperative bleeding (mean −136 mL, 95% confidence interval [CI] −189 to −83), blood loss of more than 1000 mL (relative risk 0.38, 95% CI 0.18–0.81), and blood transfusion (relative risk 0.32, 95% CI 0.17–0.59). In abdominal myomectomy, TA also significantly reduced intraoperative bleeding (mean −251 mL, 95% CI −391 to −110). Conclusions: Prophylactic TA treatment significantly reduced operative bleeding in women undergoing elective cesarean delivery or abdominal myomectomy. Additional randomized trials with low risk of bias are needed.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Volume136
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)120-127
Number of pages8
ISSN0020-7292
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2017

    Research areas

  • Antifibrinolytic agent, Antifibrinolytic therapy, Bleeding prophylaxis, Obstetric and gynecologic surgery, Surgical bleeding, Tranexamic acid

ID: 196716312