Ultrasound in the diagnosis and treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Evaluation of a selective screening procedure

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Ultrasound in the diagnosis and treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Evaluation of a selective screening procedure. / Strandberg, C.; Konradsen, L.A.; Ellitsgaard, N.; Glassau, E.N.

In: Ugeskrift for læger, Vol. 170, No. 4, 2008, p. 235-240.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Strandberg, C, Konradsen, LA, Ellitsgaard, N & Glassau, EN 2008, 'Ultrasound in the diagnosis and treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Evaluation of a selective screening procedure', Ugeskrift for læger, vol. 170, no. 4, pp. 235-240.

APA

Strandberg, C., Konradsen, L. A., Ellitsgaard, N., & Glassau, E. N. (2008). Ultrasound in the diagnosis and treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Evaluation of a selective screening procedure. Ugeskrift for læger, 170(4), 235-240.

Vancouver

Strandberg C, Konradsen LA, Ellitsgaard N, Glassau EN. Ultrasound in the diagnosis and treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Evaluation of a selective screening procedure. Ugeskrift for læger. 2008;170(4):235-240.

Author

Strandberg, C. ; Konradsen, L.A. ; Ellitsgaard, N. ; Glassau, E.N. / Ultrasound in the diagnosis and treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Evaluation of a selective screening procedure. In: Ugeskrift for læger. 2008 ; Vol. 170, No. 4. pp. 235-240.

Bibtex

@article{00fb1e00066e11deb05e000ea68e967b,
title = "Ultrasound in the diagnosis and treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Evaluation of a selective screening procedure",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: With the intention of reducing the treatment frequency of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH), two hospitals in Copenhagen implemented a screening and treatment procedure based on selective referral to ultrasonography of the hip (US). This paper describes and evaluates the procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The procedure defines procedures for referral, diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of DDH. From 1998 to 2003 children with risk factors or with positive Ortolanis or Barlows test were referred to US. RESULTS: The treatment rate was 0.47%, and the rate of late diagnosed cases 0.03%. No relationship was seen between morphological parameters at the first US and the outcome of hips classified as minor dysplastic or not fully developed (NFD). A statistically significant relationship was seen between the degree of dysplasia and the time until US normalization of the hips (p= 0.02). There was no relapse of dysplasia after treatment. The median duration of treatment was six, eight and nine weeks for mild, moderate and severe dysplasia respectively. CONCLUSION: The procedure resulted in a low rate of treatment and a small number of late diagnosed cases. Prediction of the outcome of minor dysplastic/NFD hips must be based on a minimum of two US. An individualization of the treatment length was possible, and treatment length could be shortened in many cases. Compared with the incidence of DDH in Gentofte Hospital before the use of US, we suggest that this selective ultrasound screening procedure is worthwhile Udgivelsesdato: 2008/1/21",
author = "C. Strandberg and L.A. Konradsen and N. Ellitsgaard and E.N. Glassau",
year = "2008",
language = "Dansk",
volume = "170",
pages = "235--240",
journal = "Ugeskrift for Laeger",
issn = "0041-5782",
publisher = "Almindelige Danske Laegeforening",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ultrasound in the diagnosis and treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Evaluation of a selective screening procedure

AU - Strandberg, C.

AU - Konradsen, L.A.

AU - Ellitsgaard, N.

AU - Glassau, E.N.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - INTRODUCTION: With the intention of reducing the treatment frequency of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH), two hospitals in Copenhagen implemented a screening and treatment procedure based on selective referral to ultrasonography of the hip (US). This paper describes and evaluates the procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The procedure defines procedures for referral, diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of DDH. From 1998 to 2003 children with risk factors or with positive Ortolanis or Barlows test were referred to US. RESULTS: The treatment rate was 0.47%, and the rate of late diagnosed cases 0.03%. No relationship was seen between morphological parameters at the first US and the outcome of hips classified as minor dysplastic or not fully developed (NFD). A statistically significant relationship was seen between the degree of dysplasia and the time until US normalization of the hips (p= 0.02). There was no relapse of dysplasia after treatment. The median duration of treatment was six, eight and nine weeks for mild, moderate and severe dysplasia respectively. CONCLUSION: The procedure resulted in a low rate of treatment and a small number of late diagnosed cases. Prediction of the outcome of minor dysplastic/NFD hips must be based on a minimum of two US. An individualization of the treatment length was possible, and treatment length could be shortened in many cases. Compared with the incidence of DDH in Gentofte Hospital before the use of US, we suggest that this selective ultrasound screening procedure is worthwhile Udgivelsesdato: 2008/1/21

AB - INTRODUCTION: With the intention of reducing the treatment frequency of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH), two hospitals in Copenhagen implemented a screening and treatment procedure based on selective referral to ultrasonography of the hip (US). This paper describes and evaluates the procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The procedure defines procedures for referral, diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of DDH. From 1998 to 2003 children with risk factors or with positive Ortolanis or Barlows test were referred to US. RESULTS: The treatment rate was 0.47%, and the rate of late diagnosed cases 0.03%. No relationship was seen between morphological parameters at the first US and the outcome of hips classified as minor dysplastic or not fully developed (NFD). A statistically significant relationship was seen between the degree of dysplasia and the time until US normalization of the hips (p= 0.02). There was no relapse of dysplasia after treatment. The median duration of treatment was six, eight and nine weeks for mild, moderate and severe dysplasia respectively. CONCLUSION: The procedure resulted in a low rate of treatment and a small number of late diagnosed cases. Prediction of the outcome of minor dysplastic/NFD hips must be based on a minimum of two US. An individualization of the treatment length was possible, and treatment length could be shortened in many cases. Compared with the incidence of DDH in Gentofte Hospital before the use of US, we suggest that this selective ultrasound screening procedure is worthwhile Udgivelsesdato: 2008/1/21

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

VL - 170

SP - 235

EP - 240

JO - Ugeskrift for Laeger

JF - Ugeskrift for Laeger

SN - 0041-5782

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 10951833