Open versus laparoscopic umbilical and epigastric hernia repair: nationwide data on short- and long-term outcomes

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Open versus laparoscopic umbilical and epigastric hernia repair : nationwide data on short- and long-term outcomes. / Henriksen, N. A.; Jorgensen, L. N.; Friis-Andersen, H.; Helgstrand, F.; the Danish Hernia Database.

In: Surgical Endoscopy, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2022, p. 526-532.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Henriksen, NA, Jorgensen, LN, Friis-Andersen, H, Helgstrand, F & the Danish Hernia Database 2022, 'Open versus laparoscopic umbilical and epigastric hernia repair: nationwide data on short- and long-term outcomes', Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 526-532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08312-5

APA

Henriksen, N. A., Jorgensen, L. N., Friis-Andersen, H., Helgstrand, F., & the Danish Hernia Database (2022). Open versus laparoscopic umbilical and epigastric hernia repair: nationwide data on short- and long-term outcomes. Surgical Endoscopy, 36(1), 526-532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08312-5

Vancouver

Henriksen NA, Jorgensen LN, Friis-Andersen H, Helgstrand F, the Danish Hernia Database. Open versus laparoscopic umbilical and epigastric hernia repair: nationwide data on short- and long-term outcomes. Surgical Endoscopy. 2022;36(1):526-532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08312-5

Author

Henriksen, N. A. ; Jorgensen, L. N. ; Friis-Andersen, H. ; Helgstrand, F. ; the Danish Hernia Database. / Open versus laparoscopic umbilical and epigastric hernia repair : nationwide data on short- and long-term outcomes. In: Surgical Endoscopy. 2022 ; Vol. 36, No. 1. pp. 526-532.

Bibtex

@article{e230c40b55cc4bb2b9d44629fa72c027,
title = "Open versus laparoscopic umbilical and epigastric hernia repair: nationwide data on short- and long-term outcomes",
abstract = "Background: It is unclear whether an open or laparoscopic approach results in the best outcomes for repair of umbilical and epigastric hernias. The aim of the study was to evaluate the rates of 90-day readmission and reoperation for complication, together with rate of operation for recurrence after either open or laparoscopic mesh repair for primary umbilical or epigastric hernias with defect widths above 1 cm. Methods: A merge of data between the Danish Hernia Database and the National Patient Registry provided data from 2007 to 2018 on perioperative information, 90-day readmission, 90-day reoperation for complication, and long-term operation for hernia recurrence. Results: A total of 6855 patients were included, of whom 4106 (59.9%) and 2749 (40.1%) patients had an open or laparoscopic repair, respectively. There were significantly more patients readmitted with a superficial surgical site infection 2.5% (102/4106) after open repair compared with laparoscopic repair (0.5% (15/2749), P < 0.001. The 90-day reoperation rate for complications was significantly higher for open repairs 5.0% (205/4106) compared with laparoscopic repairs 2.7% (75/2749), P < 0.001. The incidence of a reoperation for a severe condition was significantly increased after laparoscopic repair 1.5% (41/2749) compared with open repair 0.8% (34/4106), P = 0.010. The 4-year cumulative incidence of operation for hernia recurrence was 3.5% after open and 4.2% after laparoscopic repairs, P = 0.302. Conclusions: Recurrence rates were comparable between open and laparoscopic repair of umbilical and epigastric hernias. Open repair was associated with a significantly higher rate of readmission and reoperation due to surgical site infection, whereas the rate of reoperation due to a severe complication was significantly higher after laparoscopic repair.",
keywords = "Complication, IPOM, Mesh, Recurrence, Surgical site infection, Ventral hernia",
author = "Henriksen, {N. A.} and Jorgensen, {L. N.} and H. Friis-Andersen and F. Helgstrand and {the Danish Hernia Database}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-021-08312-5",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "526--532",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Open versus laparoscopic umbilical and epigastric hernia repair

T2 - nationwide data on short- and long-term outcomes

AU - Henriksen, N. A.

AU - Jorgensen, L. N.

AU - Friis-Andersen, H.

AU - Helgstrand, F.

AU - the Danish Hernia Database

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Background: It is unclear whether an open or laparoscopic approach results in the best outcomes for repair of umbilical and epigastric hernias. The aim of the study was to evaluate the rates of 90-day readmission and reoperation for complication, together with rate of operation for recurrence after either open or laparoscopic mesh repair for primary umbilical or epigastric hernias with defect widths above 1 cm. Methods: A merge of data between the Danish Hernia Database and the National Patient Registry provided data from 2007 to 2018 on perioperative information, 90-day readmission, 90-day reoperation for complication, and long-term operation for hernia recurrence. Results: A total of 6855 patients were included, of whom 4106 (59.9%) and 2749 (40.1%) patients had an open or laparoscopic repair, respectively. There were significantly more patients readmitted with a superficial surgical site infection 2.5% (102/4106) after open repair compared with laparoscopic repair (0.5% (15/2749), P < 0.001. The 90-day reoperation rate for complications was significantly higher for open repairs 5.0% (205/4106) compared with laparoscopic repairs 2.7% (75/2749), P < 0.001. The incidence of a reoperation for a severe condition was significantly increased after laparoscopic repair 1.5% (41/2749) compared with open repair 0.8% (34/4106), P = 0.010. The 4-year cumulative incidence of operation for hernia recurrence was 3.5% after open and 4.2% after laparoscopic repairs, P = 0.302. Conclusions: Recurrence rates were comparable between open and laparoscopic repair of umbilical and epigastric hernias. Open repair was associated with a significantly higher rate of readmission and reoperation due to surgical site infection, whereas the rate of reoperation due to a severe complication was significantly higher after laparoscopic repair.

AB - Background: It is unclear whether an open or laparoscopic approach results in the best outcomes for repair of umbilical and epigastric hernias. The aim of the study was to evaluate the rates of 90-day readmission and reoperation for complication, together with rate of operation for recurrence after either open or laparoscopic mesh repair for primary umbilical or epigastric hernias with defect widths above 1 cm. Methods: A merge of data between the Danish Hernia Database and the National Patient Registry provided data from 2007 to 2018 on perioperative information, 90-day readmission, 90-day reoperation for complication, and long-term operation for hernia recurrence. Results: A total of 6855 patients were included, of whom 4106 (59.9%) and 2749 (40.1%) patients had an open or laparoscopic repair, respectively. There were significantly more patients readmitted with a superficial surgical site infection 2.5% (102/4106) after open repair compared with laparoscopic repair (0.5% (15/2749), P < 0.001. The 90-day reoperation rate for complications was significantly higher for open repairs 5.0% (205/4106) compared with laparoscopic repairs 2.7% (75/2749), P < 0.001. The incidence of a reoperation for a severe condition was significantly increased after laparoscopic repair 1.5% (41/2749) compared with open repair 0.8% (34/4106), P = 0.010. The 4-year cumulative incidence of operation for hernia recurrence was 3.5% after open and 4.2% after laparoscopic repairs, P = 0.302. Conclusions: Recurrence rates were comparable between open and laparoscopic repair of umbilical and epigastric hernias. Open repair was associated with a significantly higher rate of readmission and reoperation due to surgical site infection, whereas the rate of reoperation due to a severe complication was significantly higher after laparoscopic repair.

KW - Complication

KW - IPOM

KW - Mesh

KW - Recurrence

KW - Surgical site infection

KW - Ventral hernia

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-021-08312-5

DO - 10.1007/s00464-021-08312-5

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33528663

AN - SCOPUS:85100434454

VL - 36

SP - 526

EP - 532

JO - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

JF - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 313870576