Optimal pain management for radical prostatectomy surgery: what is the evidence?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Grish P Joshi
  • Thomas Jaschinski
  • Francis Bonnet
  • Kehlet, Henrik
  • PROSPECT collaboration

BACKGROUND: Increase in the diagnosis of prostate cancer has increased the incidence of radical prostatectomy. However, the literature assessing pain therapy for this procedure has not been systematically evaluated. Thus, optimal pain therapy for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy remains controversial.

METHODS: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies assessing the effects of analgesic and anesthetic interventions on pain after radical prostatectomy. All searches were conducted in October 2012 and updated in June 2015.

RESULTS: Most treatments studied improved pain relief and/or reduced opioid requirements. However, there were significant differences in the study designs and the variables evaluated, precluding quantitative analysis and consensus recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review reveals that there is a lack of evidence to develop an optimal pain management protocol in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Most studies assessed unimodal analgesic approaches rather than a multimodal technique. There is a need for more procedure-specific studies comparing pain and analgesic requirements for open and minimally invasive surgical procedures. Finally, while we wait for appropriate procedure specific evidence from publication of adequate studies assessing optimal pain management after radical prostatectomy, we propose a basic analgesic guideline.

Original languageEnglish
Article number159
JournalB M C Anesthesiology
Volume15
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
ISSN1471-2253
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

ID: 161688645