Association Between Endovascular Performance in a Simulated Setting and in the Catheterization Laboratory
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Association Between Endovascular Performance in a Simulated Setting and in the Catheterization Laboratory. / Räder, Sune B E W; Abildgaard, Ulrik; Jørgensen, Erik; Bech, Bo; Lönn, Lars; Ringsted, Charlotte V.
In: Simulation in Healthcare, Vol. 9, No. 4, 08.2014, p. 241-248.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Association Between Endovascular Performance in a Simulated Setting and in the Catheterization Laboratory
AU - Räder, Sune B E W
AU - Abildgaard, Ulrik
AU - Jørgensen, Erik
AU - Bech, Bo
AU - Lönn, Lars
AU - Ringsted, Charlotte V
PY - 2014/8
Y1 - 2014/8
N2 - INTRODUCTION: Simulation-based assessment studies have related simulator performance to clinical experience instead of actual clinical performance. This study validates a novel rating scale for coronary angiography (CA) performance and at the same time explores the association between CA performance in a simulated setting and in the catheterization laboratory.METHODS: Ten cardiologists and cardiology residents with varying degrees of CA experience performed 2 CAs in the catheterization laboratory and 2 CAs in a simulated setting. The residents had prior simulator experience opposite cardiologists. Two raters assessed the operators' video-recorded performances using the novel CA rating scale (CARS).RESULTS: The correlation between CARS scores in the catheterization laboratory and the simulated setting was R = 0.20 (P = 0.195). Residents' scores were higher in the simulated setting than in the catheterization laboratory. The correlation between operators' previous clinical experience in CA and CARS scores was R = 0.65 (P = 0.005) in the catheterization laboratory and R = 0.11 (P = 0.353) in the simulated setting.CONCLUSIONS: The association between CA performance in a simulated setting and actual performance in the catheterization laboratory is not linear. The novel rating scale for CA (CARS) seems to be a valid proficiency assessment instrument in the catheterization laboratory. Familiarity with the simulator may overestimate proficiency, which means that simulator performance as a predictor of clinical performance should be interpreted with caution.
AB - INTRODUCTION: Simulation-based assessment studies have related simulator performance to clinical experience instead of actual clinical performance. This study validates a novel rating scale for coronary angiography (CA) performance and at the same time explores the association between CA performance in a simulated setting and in the catheterization laboratory.METHODS: Ten cardiologists and cardiology residents with varying degrees of CA experience performed 2 CAs in the catheterization laboratory and 2 CAs in a simulated setting. The residents had prior simulator experience opposite cardiologists. Two raters assessed the operators' video-recorded performances using the novel CA rating scale (CARS).RESULTS: The correlation between CARS scores in the catheterization laboratory and the simulated setting was R = 0.20 (P = 0.195). Residents' scores were higher in the simulated setting than in the catheterization laboratory. The correlation between operators' previous clinical experience in CA and CARS scores was R = 0.65 (P = 0.005) in the catheterization laboratory and R = 0.11 (P = 0.353) in the simulated setting.CONCLUSIONS: The association between CA performance in a simulated setting and actual performance in the catheterization laboratory is not linear. The novel rating scale for CA (CARS) seems to be a valid proficiency assessment instrument in the catheterization laboratory. Familiarity with the simulator may overestimate proficiency, which means that simulator performance as a predictor of clinical performance should be interpreted with caution.
KW - Cardiac Catheterization
KW - Cardiology
KW - Clinical Competence
KW - Computer Simulation
KW - Coronary Angiography
KW - Education, Medical, Graduate
KW - Humans
KW - Internship and Residency
KW - Phantoms, Imaging
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Task Performance and Analysis
KW - User-Computer Interface
KW - Video Recording
U2 - 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000037
DO - 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000037
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 25090168
VL - 9
SP - 241
EP - 248
JO - Simulation in Healthcare
JF - Simulation in Healthcare
SN - 1559-2332
IS - 4
ER -
ID: 137675417