Challenges recruiting to a proof-of-concept pharmaceutical trial for a rare disease: the trigeminal neuralgia experience

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

  • Joanna M Zakrzewska
  • Joanne Palmer
  • Bendtsen, Lars
  • Giulia Di Stefano
  • Dominik A Ettlin
  • Stine Maarbjerg
  • Mark Obermann
  • Valerie Morisset
  • Deb Steiner
  • Simon Tate
  • Giorgio Cruccu

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to describe recruitment challenges encountered during a phase IIa study of vixotrigine, a state and use-dependent Nav1.7 channel blocker, in individuals with trigeminal neuralgia.

METHODS: This was an international, multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal study that included a 7-day run-in period, a 21-day open-label phase, and a 28-day double-blind phase in which patients (planned n = 30) were randomized to vixotrigine or placebo. Before recruitment, all antiepileptic drugs had to be stopped, except for gabapentin or pregabalin. After the trial, patients returned to their original medications. Patient recruitment was expanded beyond the original five planned (core) centers in order to meet target enrollment (total recruiting sites N = 25). Core sites contributed data related to patient identification for study participation (prescreening data). Data related to screening failures and study withdrawal were also analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS: Approximately half (322/636; 50.6%) of the patients who were prescreened at core sites were considered eligible for the study and 56/322 (17.4%) were screened. Of those considered eligible, 26/322 (8.1%) enrolled in the study and 6/322 (1.9%) completed the study. In total, 125 patients were screened across all study sites and 67/125 (53.6%) were enrolled. At prescreening, reasons for noneligibility varied by site and were most commonly diagnosis change (78/314; 24.8%), age > 80 years (75/314; 23.9%), language/distance/mobility (61/314; 19.4%), and noncardiac medical problems (53/314; 16.9%). At screening, frequently cited reasons for noneligibility included failure based on electrocardiogram, insufficient pain, and diagnosis change.

CONCLUSIONS: Factors contributing to recruitment challenges encountered in this study included diagnosis changes, anxiety over treatment changes, and issues relating to distance, language, and mobility. Wherever possible, future studies should be designed to address these challenges.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01540630 . EudraCT, 2010-023963-16. 07 Aug 2015.

Original languageEnglish
Article number704
JournalTrials
Volume19
Number of pages10
ISSN1745-6215
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Research areas

  • Adult, Aged, Analgesics/adverse effects, Double-Blind Method, Europe, Humans, Middle Aged, NAV1.7 Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel/drug effects, Pain Measurement, Patient Selection, Rare Diseases/diagnosis, Sample Size, Sodium Channel Blockers/adverse effects, South Africa, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Trigeminal Nerve/drug effects, Trigeminal Neuralgia/diagnosis, Young Adult

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk


No data available

ID: 218614575