Cochlear implantation: Exploring the effects of 3D stereovision in a digital microscope for virtual reality simulation training–A randomized controlled trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Cochlear implantation : Exploring the effects of 3D stereovision in a digital microscope for virtual reality simulation training–A randomized controlled trial. / Frithioff, Andreas; Frendø, Martin; Mikkelsen, Peter Trier; Sørensen, Mads Sølvsten; Andersen, Steven Arild Wuyts.

In: Cochlear Implants International, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2022, p. 80-86.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Frithioff, A, Frendø, M, Mikkelsen, PT, Sørensen, MS & Andersen, SAW 2022, 'Cochlear implantation: Exploring the effects of 3D stereovision in a digital microscope for virtual reality simulation training–A randomized controlled trial', Cochlear Implants International, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 80-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2021.1997026

APA

Frithioff, A., Frendø, M., Mikkelsen, P. T., Sørensen, M. S., & Andersen, S. A. W. (2022). Cochlear implantation: Exploring the effects of 3D stereovision in a digital microscope for virtual reality simulation training–A randomized controlled trial. Cochlear Implants International, 23(2), 80-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2021.1997026

Vancouver

Frithioff A, Frendø M, Mikkelsen PT, Sørensen MS, Andersen SAW. Cochlear implantation: Exploring the effects of 3D stereovision in a digital microscope for virtual reality simulation training–A randomized controlled trial. Cochlear Implants International. 2022;23(2):80-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2021.1997026

Author

Frithioff, Andreas ; Frendø, Martin ; Mikkelsen, Peter Trier ; Sørensen, Mads Sølvsten ; Andersen, Steven Arild Wuyts. / Cochlear implantation : Exploring the effects of 3D stereovision in a digital microscope for virtual reality simulation training–A randomized controlled trial. In: Cochlear Implants International. 2022 ; Vol. 23, No. 2. pp. 80-86.

Bibtex

@article{a9a48ab91fb24d6793d61a071a17ced1,
title = "Cochlear implantation: Exploring the effects of 3D stereovision in a digital microscope for virtual reality simulation training–A randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Objective: In cochlear implantation (CI), excellent surgical technique is critical for hearing outcomes. Recent advances in temporal bone Virtual Reality (VR) training allow for specific training of CI and through introduction of new digital microscopes with ultra-high-fidelity (UHF) graphics. This study aims to investigate whether UHF increases performance in VR simulation training of CI electrode insertion compared with conventional, screen-based VR (cVR). Methods: Twenty-four medical students completed a randomized, controlled trial of an educational intervention. They performed a total of eight CI electrode insertions each in blocks of four using either UHF-VR or cVR, in randomized order. CI electrode insertion performances were rated by two blinded expert raters using a structured assessment tool supported by validity evidence. Results: Performance scores in cVR were higher than in the UHF-VR simulation although this was not significant (19.8 points, 95% CI [19.3–20.3] vs. 18.8 points, 95% CI [18.2–19.4]; P = 0.09). The decisive factor for performance was participants{\textquoteright} ability to achieve stereovision (mean difference = 1.1 points, 95% CI [0.15–2.08], P = 0.02). Discussion: No additional benefit was found from UHF-VR over cVR training of CI electrode insertion for novices. Consequently, standard cVR simulation should be used for novices{\textquoteright} basic skills acquisition in CI surgery. Future studies should instead explore the effects of other improvements in CI surgery training and if the lacking benefit of UHF-VR also applies for more experienced learners. Conclusion: The increased graphical perception and the superior lifelikeness of UHF-VR does not improve early skills acquisition of CI insertion for novices.",
keywords = "Cochlear implantation, Simulation-based surgical training, Virtual reality simulation",
author = "Andreas Frithioff and Martin Frend{\o} and Mikkelsen, {Peter Trier} and S{\o}rensen, {Mads S{\o}lvsten} and Andersen, {Steven Arild Wuyts}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1080/14670100.2021.1997026",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "80--86",
journal = "Cochlear Implants International",
issn = "1467-0100",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cochlear implantation

T2 - Exploring the effects of 3D stereovision in a digital microscope for virtual reality simulation training–A randomized controlled trial

AU - Frithioff, Andreas

AU - Frendø, Martin

AU - Mikkelsen, Peter Trier

AU - Sørensen, Mads Sølvsten

AU - Andersen, Steven Arild Wuyts

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Objective: In cochlear implantation (CI), excellent surgical technique is critical for hearing outcomes. Recent advances in temporal bone Virtual Reality (VR) training allow for specific training of CI and through introduction of new digital microscopes with ultra-high-fidelity (UHF) graphics. This study aims to investigate whether UHF increases performance in VR simulation training of CI electrode insertion compared with conventional, screen-based VR (cVR). Methods: Twenty-four medical students completed a randomized, controlled trial of an educational intervention. They performed a total of eight CI electrode insertions each in blocks of four using either UHF-VR or cVR, in randomized order. CI electrode insertion performances were rated by two blinded expert raters using a structured assessment tool supported by validity evidence. Results: Performance scores in cVR were higher than in the UHF-VR simulation although this was not significant (19.8 points, 95% CI [19.3–20.3] vs. 18.8 points, 95% CI [18.2–19.4]; P = 0.09). The decisive factor for performance was participants’ ability to achieve stereovision (mean difference = 1.1 points, 95% CI [0.15–2.08], P = 0.02). Discussion: No additional benefit was found from UHF-VR over cVR training of CI electrode insertion for novices. Consequently, standard cVR simulation should be used for novices’ basic skills acquisition in CI surgery. Future studies should instead explore the effects of other improvements in CI surgery training and if the lacking benefit of UHF-VR also applies for more experienced learners. Conclusion: The increased graphical perception and the superior lifelikeness of UHF-VR does not improve early skills acquisition of CI insertion for novices.

AB - Objective: In cochlear implantation (CI), excellent surgical technique is critical for hearing outcomes. Recent advances in temporal bone Virtual Reality (VR) training allow for specific training of CI and through introduction of new digital microscopes with ultra-high-fidelity (UHF) graphics. This study aims to investigate whether UHF increases performance in VR simulation training of CI electrode insertion compared with conventional, screen-based VR (cVR). Methods: Twenty-four medical students completed a randomized, controlled trial of an educational intervention. They performed a total of eight CI electrode insertions each in blocks of four using either UHF-VR or cVR, in randomized order. CI electrode insertion performances were rated by two blinded expert raters using a structured assessment tool supported by validity evidence. Results: Performance scores in cVR were higher than in the UHF-VR simulation although this was not significant (19.8 points, 95% CI [19.3–20.3] vs. 18.8 points, 95% CI [18.2–19.4]; P = 0.09). The decisive factor for performance was participants’ ability to achieve stereovision (mean difference = 1.1 points, 95% CI [0.15–2.08], P = 0.02). Discussion: No additional benefit was found from UHF-VR over cVR training of CI electrode insertion for novices. Consequently, standard cVR simulation should be used for novices’ basic skills acquisition in CI surgery. Future studies should instead explore the effects of other improvements in CI surgery training and if the lacking benefit of UHF-VR also applies for more experienced learners. Conclusion: The increased graphical perception and the superior lifelikeness of UHF-VR does not improve early skills acquisition of CI insertion for novices.

KW - Cochlear implantation

KW - Simulation-based surgical training

KW - Virtual reality simulation

U2 - 10.1080/14670100.2021.1997026

DO - 10.1080/14670100.2021.1997026

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34852727

AN - SCOPUS:85120935345

VL - 23

SP - 80

EP - 86

JO - Cochlear Implants International

JF - Cochlear Implants International

SN - 1467-0100

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 314072371