Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Jan Kottner
  • Laurent Audige
  • Brorson, Stig
  • Allan Donner
  • Byron J Gajewski
  • Asbjørn Hróbjartsson
  • Chris Roberts
  • Mohamed Shoukri
  • David L Streiner
Results of reliability and agreement studies are intended to provide information about the amount of error inherent in any diagnosis, score, or measurement. The level of reliability and agreement among users of scales, instruments, or classifications is widely unknown. Therefore, there is a need for rigorously conducted interrater and intrarater reliability and agreement studies. Information about sample selection, study design, and statistical analysis is often incomplete. Because of inadequate reporting, interpretation and synthesis of study results are often difficult. Widely accepted criteria, standards, or guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement in the health care and medical field are lacking. The objective was to develop guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Nursing Studies
Volume48
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)661-71
Number of pages11
ISSN0020-7489
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

ID: 185940857