Potential Clinical Impact of LAFOV PET/CT: A Systematic Evaluation of Image Quality and Lesion Detection

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Potential Clinical Impact of LAFOV PET/CT : A Systematic Evaluation of Image Quality and Lesion Detection. / Honoré d’Este, Sabrina; Andersen, Flemming Littrup; Andersen, Julie Bjerglund; Jakobsen, Annika Loft; Sanchez Saxtoft, Eunice; Schulze, Christina; Hansen, Naja Liv; Andersen, Kim Francis; Reichkendler, Michala Holm; Højgaard, Liselotte; Fischer, Barbara Malene.

In: Diagnostics, Vol. 13, No. 21, 3295, 2023.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Honoré d’Este, S, Andersen, FL, Andersen, JB, Jakobsen, AL, Sanchez Saxtoft, E, Schulze, C, Hansen, NL, Andersen, KF, Reichkendler, MH, Højgaard, L & Fischer, BM 2023, 'Potential Clinical Impact of LAFOV PET/CT: A Systematic Evaluation of Image Quality and Lesion Detection', Diagnostics, vol. 13, no. 21, 3295. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13213295

APA

Honoré d’Este, S., Andersen, F. L., Andersen, J. B., Jakobsen, A. L., Sanchez Saxtoft, E., Schulze, C., Hansen, N. L., Andersen, K. F., Reichkendler, M. H., Højgaard, L., & Fischer, B. M. (2023). Potential Clinical Impact of LAFOV PET/CT: A Systematic Evaluation of Image Quality and Lesion Detection. Diagnostics, 13(21), [3295]. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13213295

Vancouver

Honoré d’Este S, Andersen FL, Andersen JB, Jakobsen AL, Sanchez Saxtoft E, Schulze C et al. Potential Clinical Impact of LAFOV PET/CT: A Systematic Evaluation of Image Quality and Lesion Detection. Diagnostics. 2023;13(21). 3295. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13213295

Author

Honoré d’Este, Sabrina ; Andersen, Flemming Littrup ; Andersen, Julie Bjerglund ; Jakobsen, Annika Loft ; Sanchez Saxtoft, Eunice ; Schulze, Christina ; Hansen, Naja Liv ; Andersen, Kim Francis ; Reichkendler, Michala Holm ; Højgaard, Liselotte ; Fischer, Barbara Malene. / Potential Clinical Impact of LAFOV PET/CT : A Systematic Evaluation of Image Quality and Lesion Detection. In: Diagnostics. 2023 ; Vol. 13, No. 21.

Bibtex

@article{c5f31b38401a4dcaa6b013bd57e23158,
title = "Potential Clinical Impact of LAFOV PET/CT: A Systematic Evaluation of Image Quality and Lesion Detection",
abstract = "We performed a systematic evaluation of the diagnostic performance of LAFOV PET/CT with increasing acquisition time. The first 100 oncologic adult patients referred for 3 MBq/kg 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET/CT on the Siemens Biograph Vision Quadra were included. A standard imaging protocol of 10 min was used and scans were reconstructed at 30 s, 60 s, 90 s, 180 s, 300 s, and 600 s. Paired comparisons of quantitative image noise, qualitative image quality, lesion detection, and lesion classification were performed. Image noise (n = 50, 34 women) was acceptable according to the current standard of care (coefficient-of-varianceref < 0.15) after 90 s and improved significantly with increasing acquisition time (PB < 0.001). The same was seen in observer rankings (PB < 0.001). Lesion detection (n = 100, 74 women) improved significantly from 30 s to 90 s (PB < 0.001), 90 s to 180 s (PB = 0.001), and 90 s to 300 s (PB = 0.002), while lesion classification improved from 90 s to 180 s (PB < 0.001), 180 s to 300 s (PB = 0.021), and 90 s to 300 s (PB < 0.001). We observed improved image quality, lesion detection, and lesion classification with increasing acquisition time while maintaining a total scan time of less than 5 min, which demonstrates a potential clinical benefit. Based on these results we recommend a standard imaging acquisition protocol for LAFOV PET/CT of minimum 180 s to maximum 300 s after injection of 3 MBq/kg 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose.",
keywords = "image quality, lesion detection, long-axial field-of-view (LAFOV), PET-CT, quadra, total-body PET, whole-body PET",
author = "{Honor{\'e} d{\textquoteright}Este}, Sabrina and Andersen, {Flemming Littrup} and Andersen, {Julie Bjerglund} and Jakobsen, {Annika Loft} and {Sanchez Saxtoft}, Eunice and Christina Schulze and Hansen, {Naja Liv} and Andersen, {Kim Francis} and Reichkendler, {Michala Holm} and Liselotte H{\o}jgaard and Fischer, {Barbara Malene}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 by the authors.",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.3390/diagnostics13213295",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "Diagnostics",
issn = "2075-4418",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "21",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Potential Clinical Impact of LAFOV PET/CT

T2 - A Systematic Evaluation of Image Quality and Lesion Detection

AU - Honoré d’Este, Sabrina

AU - Andersen, Flemming Littrup

AU - Andersen, Julie Bjerglund

AU - Jakobsen, Annika Loft

AU - Sanchez Saxtoft, Eunice

AU - Schulze, Christina

AU - Hansen, Naja Liv

AU - Andersen, Kim Francis

AU - Reichkendler, Michala Holm

AU - Højgaard, Liselotte

AU - Fischer, Barbara Malene

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 by the authors.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - We performed a systematic evaluation of the diagnostic performance of LAFOV PET/CT with increasing acquisition time. The first 100 oncologic adult patients referred for 3 MBq/kg 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET/CT on the Siemens Biograph Vision Quadra were included. A standard imaging protocol of 10 min was used and scans were reconstructed at 30 s, 60 s, 90 s, 180 s, 300 s, and 600 s. Paired comparisons of quantitative image noise, qualitative image quality, lesion detection, and lesion classification were performed. Image noise (n = 50, 34 women) was acceptable according to the current standard of care (coefficient-of-varianceref < 0.15) after 90 s and improved significantly with increasing acquisition time (PB < 0.001). The same was seen in observer rankings (PB < 0.001). Lesion detection (n = 100, 74 women) improved significantly from 30 s to 90 s (PB < 0.001), 90 s to 180 s (PB = 0.001), and 90 s to 300 s (PB = 0.002), while lesion classification improved from 90 s to 180 s (PB < 0.001), 180 s to 300 s (PB = 0.021), and 90 s to 300 s (PB < 0.001). We observed improved image quality, lesion detection, and lesion classification with increasing acquisition time while maintaining a total scan time of less than 5 min, which demonstrates a potential clinical benefit. Based on these results we recommend a standard imaging acquisition protocol for LAFOV PET/CT of minimum 180 s to maximum 300 s after injection of 3 MBq/kg 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose.

AB - We performed a systematic evaluation of the diagnostic performance of LAFOV PET/CT with increasing acquisition time. The first 100 oncologic adult patients referred for 3 MBq/kg 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET/CT on the Siemens Biograph Vision Quadra were included. A standard imaging protocol of 10 min was used and scans were reconstructed at 30 s, 60 s, 90 s, 180 s, 300 s, and 600 s. Paired comparisons of quantitative image noise, qualitative image quality, lesion detection, and lesion classification were performed. Image noise (n = 50, 34 women) was acceptable according to the current standard of care (coefficient-of-varianceref < 0.15) after 90 s and improved significantly with increasing acquisition time (PB < 0.001). The same was seen in observer rankings (PB < 0.001). Lesion detection (n = 100, 74 women) improved significantly from 30 s to 90 s (PB < 0.001), 90 s to 180 s (PB = 0.001), and 90 s to 300 s (PB = 0.002), while lesion classification improved from 90 s to 180 s (PB < 0.001), 180 s to 300 s (PB = 0.021), and 90 s to 300 s (PB < 0.001). We observed improved image quality, lesion detection, and lesion classification with increasing acquisition time while maintaining a total scan time of less than 5 min, which demonstrates a potential clinical benefit. Based on these results we recommend a standard imaging acquisition protocol for LAFOV PET/CT of minimum 180 s to maximum 300 s after injection of 3 MBq/kg 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose.

KW - image quality

KW - lesion detection

KW - long-axial field-of-view (LAFOV)

KW - PET-CT

KW - quadra

KW - total-body PET

KW - whole-body PET

U2 - 10.3390/diagnostics13213295

DO - 10.3390/diagnostics13213295

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 37958190

AN - SCOPUS:85176440754

VL - 13

JO - Diagnostics

JF - Diagnostics

SN - 2075-4418

IS - 21

M1 - 3295

ER -

ID: 374645662