Preferred treatment frequency in patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy for advanced prostate cancer
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Preferred treatment frequency in patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy for advanced prostate cancer. / Fode, Mikkel; Nielsen, Torben K; Al-Hamadani, Muhammad; Andersen, Jesper R; Jakobsen, Henrik; Sønksen, Jens.
In: Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, Vol. 48, No. 2, 04.2014, p. 183-188.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Preferred treatment frequency in patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy for advanced prostate cancer
AU - Fode, Mikkel
AU - Nielsen, Torben K
AU - Al-Hamadani, Muhammad
AU - Andersen, Jesper R
AU - Jakobsen, Henrik
AU - Sønksen, Jens
PY - 2014/4
Y1 - 2014/4
N2 - OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess patient preference regarding the length of treatment intervals of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for prostate cancer.MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted as a questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study at a large university hospital. A specific questionnaire was developed based on current literature, clinical experience and a pilot phase of the study. The primary endpoint was preferred treatment frequency. Secondary outcome measures included reasons for preferred treatment frequency, treatment satisfaction and side-effects. Overall, 238 men receiving ADT for prostate cancer were presented with the questionnaire between September 2011 and May 2012. Descriptive statistics, the chi-squared test and multiple regression were used for analyses.RESULTS: In total, 176 questionnaires (74%) were available for analysis. A total of 38.1% of participants preferred frequent treatment ("Every month", "Every third month"), 32.4% preferred infrequent treatment ("Every sixth month", "Every twelfth month") and 29.6% stated that length of the treatment intervals made no difference (p = 0.37). Patients with disease progression were most likely to prefer frequent treatment (odds ratio 4.4, 95% confidence interval 1.9-10.4). Overall, 84.1% were satisfied with treatment while one patient (0.6%) was dissatisfied. Nine per cent indicated severe side-effects.CONCLUSIONS: Less frequent ADT treatment may help to lower the pressure on healthcare systems and may be of benefit for a large group of patients. However, it cannot be prescribed blindly without possibly affecting patient satisfaction. The choice of treatment intervals should be made in collaboration between the physician and the patient.
AB - OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess patient preference regarding the length of treatment intervals of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for prostate cancer.MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted as a questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study at a large university hospital. A specific questionnaire was developed based on current literature, clinical experience and a pilot phase of the study. The primary endpoint was preferred treatment frequency. Secondary outcome measures included reasons for preferred treatment frequency, treatment satisfaction and side-effects. Overall, 238 men receiving ADT for prostate cancer were presented with the questionnaire between September 2011 and May 2012. Descriptive statistics, the chi-squared test and multiple regression were used for analyses.RESULTS: In total, 176 questionnaires (74%) were available for analysis. A total of 38.1% of participants preferred frequent treatment ("Every month", "Every third month"), 32.4% preferred infrequent treatment ("Every sixth month", "Every twelfth month") and 29.6% stated that length of the treatment intervals made no difference (p = 0.37). Patients with disease progression were most likely to prefer frequent treatment (odds ratio 4.4, 95% confidence interval 1.9-10.4). Overall, 84.1% were satisfied with treatment while one patient (0.6%) was dissatisfied. Nine per cent indicated severe side-effects.CONCLUSIONS: Less frequent ADT treatment may help to lower the pressure on healthcare systems and may be of benefit for a large group of patients. However, it cannot be prescribed blindly without possibly affecting patient satisfaction. The choice of treatment intervals should be made in collaboration between the physician and the patient.
KW - Aged
KW - Aged, 80 and over
KW - Androgen Antagonists
KW - Cross-Sectional Studies
KW - Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Neoplasm Staging
KW - Patient Preference
KW - Prostatic Neoplasms
KW - Time Factors
U2 - 10.3109/21681805.2013.820789
DO - 10.3109/21681805.2013.820789
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 23883294
VL - 48
SP - 183
EP - 188
JO - Scandinavian Journal of Urology
JF - Scandinavian Journal of Urology
SN - 2168-1805
IS - 2
ER -
ID: 138500649