A prospective study comparing whole-body skeletal X-ray survey with 18F-FDG-PET/CT, 18F-NaF-PET/CT and whole-body MRI in the detection of bone lesions in multiple myeloma patients

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

A prospective study comparing whole-body skeletal X-ray survey with 18F-FDG-PET/CT, 18F-NaF-PET/CT and whole-body MRI in the detection of bone lesions in multiple myeloma patients. / Dyrberg, Eva; Hendel, Helle W; Al-Farra, Gina; Balding, Lone; Løgager, Vibeke B; Madsen, Claus; Thomsen, Henrik S.

In: Acta Radiologica Open, Vol. 6, No. 10, 10.2017, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Dyrberg, E, Hendel, HW, Al-Farra, G, Balding, L, Løgager, VB, Madsen, C & Thomsen, HS 2017, 'A prospective study comparing whole-body skeletal X-ray survey with 18F-FDG-PET/CT, 18F-NaF-PET/CT and whole-body MRI in the detection of bone lesions in multiple myeloma patients', Acta Radiologica Open, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2058460117738809

APA

Dyrberg, E., Hendel, H. W., Al-Farra, G., Balding, L., Løgager, V. B., Madsen, C., & Thomsen, H. S. (2017). A prospective study comparing whole-body skeletal X-ray survey with 18F-FDG-PET/CT, 18F-NaF-PET/CT and whole-body MRI in the detection of bone lesions in multiple myeloma patients. Acta Radiologica Open, 6(10), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2058460117738809

Vancouver

Dyrberg E, Hendel HW, Al-Farra G, Balding L, Løgager VB, Madsen C et al. A prospective study comparing whole-body skeletal X-ray survey with 18F-FDG-PET/CT, 18F-NaF-PET/CT and whole-body MRI in the detection of bone lesions in multiple myeloma patients. Acta Radiologica Open. 2017 Oct;6(10):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2058460117738809

Author

Dyrberg, Eva ; Hendel, Helle W ; Al-Farra, Gina ; Balding, Lone ; Løgager, Vibeke B ; Madsen, Claus ; Thomsen, Henrik S. / A prospective study comparing whole-body skeletal X-ray survey with 18F-FDG-PET/CT, 18F-NaF-PET/CT and whole-body MRI in the detection of bone lesions in multiple myeloma patients. In: Acta Radiologica Open. 2017 ; Vol. 6, No. 10. pp. 1-8.

Bibtex

@article{e85321f8bc964229a97cca9c3250438d,
title = "A prospective study comparing whole-body skeletal X-ray survey with 18F-FDG-PET/CT, 18F-NaF-PET/CT and whole-body MRI in the detection of bone lesions in multiple myeloma patients",
abstract = "Background: For decades, the most widely used imaging technique for myeloma bone lesions has been a whole-body skeletal X-ray survey (WBXR), but newer promising imaging techniques are evolving.Purpose: To compare WBXR with the advanced imaging techniques 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT), 18F-sodium fluoride (NaF) PET/CT and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) in the detection of myeloma bone lesions.Material and Methods: Fourteen patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma were prospectively enrolled. In addition to WBXR, all patients underwent FDG-PET/CT, NaF-PET/CT, and WB-MRI. Experienced specialists performed blinded readings based on predefined anatomical regions and diagnostic criteria.Results: In a region-based analysis, a two-sided ANOVA test showed that the extent of detected skeletal disease depends on the scanning technique (P < 0.0001). Tukey's multiple comparison test revealed that WB-MRI on average detects significantly more affected regions than WBXR (P < 0.005), FDG-PET/CT (P < 0.0001), and NaF-PET/CT (P < 0.05). In a patient-based analysis, a Cochran's Q test showed that there are no significant differences in the proportion of patients with bone disease detected by the different scanning techniques (P = 0.23). Determination of intrareader variability resulted in Kappa coefficients corresponding to moderate (FDG-PET/CT) and substantial agreement (WB-MRI, WBXR, NaF-PET/CT).Conclusion: WB-MRI detects on average significantly more body regions indicative of myeloma bone disease compared to WBXR, FDG-PET/CT, and NaF-PET/CT. The lack of significance in the patient-based analysis is most likely due to the small number of study participants.",
author = "Eva Dyrberg and Hendel, {Helle W} and Gina Al-Farra and Lone Balding and L{\o}gager, {Vibeke B} and Claus Madsen and Thomsen, {Henrik S}",
year = "2017",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1177/2058460117738809",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Acta Radiologica Short Reports",
issn = "2047-9816",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A prospective study comparing whole-body skeletal X-ray survey with 18F-FDG-PET/CT, 18F-NaF-PET/CT and whole-body MRI in the detection of bone lesions in multiple myeloma patients

AU - Dyrberg, Eva

AU - Hendel, Helle W

AU - Al-Farra, Gina

AU - Balding, Lone

AU - Løgager, Vibeke B

AU - Madsen, Claus

AU - Thomsen, Henrik S

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - Background: For decades, the most widely used imaging technique for myeloma bone lesions has been a whole-body skeletal X-ray survey (WBXR), but newer promising imaging techniques are evolving.Purpose: To compare WBXR with the advanced imaging techniques 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT), 18F-sodium fluoride (NaF) PET/CT and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) in the detection of myeloma bone lesions.Material and Methods: Fourteen patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma were prospectively enrolled. In addition to WBXR, all patients underwent FDG-PET/CT, NaF-PET/CT, and WB-MRI. Experienced specialists performed blinded readings based on predefined anatomical regions and diagnostic criteria.Results: In a region-based analysis, a two-sided ANOVA test showed that the extent of detected skeletal disease depends on the scanning technique (P < 0.0001). Tukey's multiple comparison test revealed that WB-MRI on average detects significantly more affected regions than WBXR (P < 0.005), FDG-PET/CT (P < 0.0001), and NaF-PET/CT (P < 0.05). In a patient-based analysis, a Cochran's Q test showed that there are no significant differences in the proportion of patients with bone disease detected by the different scanning techniques (P = 0.23). Determination of intrareader variability resulted in Kappa coefficients corresponding to moderate (FDG-PET/CT) and substantial agreement (WB-MRI, WBXR, NaF-PET/CT).Conclusion: WB-MRI detects on average significantly more body regions indicative of myeloma bone disease compared to WBXR, FDG-PET/CT, and NaF-PET/CT. The lack of significance in the patient-based analysis is most likely due to the small number of study participants.

AB - Background: For decades, the most widely used imaging technique for myeloma bone lesions has been a whole-body skeletal X-ray survey (WBXR), but newer promising imaging techniques are evolving.Purpose: To compare WBXR with the advanced imaging techniques 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT), 18F-sodium fluoride (NaF) PET/CT and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) in the detection of myeloma bone lesions.Material and Methods: Fourteen patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma were prospectively enrolled. In addition to WBXR, all patients underwent FDG-PET/CT, NaF-PET/CT, and WB-MRI. Experienced specialists performed blinded readings based on predefined anatomical regions and diagnostic criteria.Results: In a region-based analysis, a two-sided ANOVA test showed that the extent of detected skeletal disease depends on the scanning technique (P < 0.0001). Tukey's multiple comparison test revealed that WB-MRI on average detects significantly more affected regions than WBXR (P < 0.005), FDG-PET/CT (P < 0.0001), and NaF-PET/CT (P < 0.05). In a patient-based analysis, a Cochran's Q test showed that there are no significant differences in the proportion of patients with bone disease detected by the different scanning techniques (P = 0.23). Determination of intrareader variability resulted in Kappa coefficients corresponding to moderate (FDG-PET/CT) and substantial agreement (WB-MRI, WBXR, NaF-PET/CT).Conclusion: WB-MRI detects on average significantly more body regions indicative of myeloma bone disease compared to WBXR, FDG-PET/CT, and NaF-PET/CT. The lack of significance in the patient-based analysis is most likely due to the small number of study participants.

U2 - 10.1177/2058460117738809

DO - 10.1177/2058460117738809

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 29123920

VL - 6

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Acta Radiologica Short Reports

JF - Acta Radiologica Short Reports

SN - 2047-9816

IS - 10

ER -

ID: 196134713