Study protocol for optimising glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes treated with multiple daily insulin injections: intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring, carbohydrate counting with automated bolus calculation, or both? A randomised controlled trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Study protocol for optimising glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes treated with multiple daily insulin injections : intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring, carbohydrate counting with automated bolus calculation, or both? A randomised controlled trial. / Secher, Anna Lilja; Pedersen-Bjergaard, Ulrik; Svendsen, Ole Lander; Gade-Rasmussen, Birthe; Almdal, Thomas P; Dørflinger, Liv; Vistisen, Dorte; Nørgaard, Kirsten.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 10, No. 4, e036474, 27.04.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Secher, AL, Pedersen-Bjergaard, U, Svendsen, OL, Gade-Rasmussen, B, Almdal, TP, Dørflinger, L, Vistisen, D & Nørgaard, K 2020, 'Study protocol for optimising glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes treated with multiple daily insulin injections: intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring, carbohydrate counting with automated bolus calculation, or both? A randomised controlled trial', BMJ Open, vol. 10, no. 4, e036474. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036474

APA

Secher, A. L., Pedersen-Bjergaard, U., Svendsen, O. L., Gade-Rasmussen, B., Almdal, T. P., Dørflinger, L., Vistisen, D., & Nørgaard, K. (2020). Study protocol for optimising glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes treated with multiple daily insulin injections: intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring, carbohydrate counting with automated bolus calculation, or both? A randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 10(4), [e036474]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036474

Vancouver

Secher AL, Pedersen-Bjergaard U, Svendsen OL, Gade-Rasmussen B, Almdal TP, Dørflinger L et al. Study protocol for optimising glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes treated with multiple daily insulin injections: intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring, carbohydrate counting with automated bolus calculation, or both? A randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 27;10(4). e036474. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036474

Author

Secher, Anna Lilja ; Pedersen-Bjergaard, Ulrik ; Svendsen, Ole Lander ; Gade-Rasmussen, Birthe ; Almdal, Thomas P ; Dørflinger, Liv ; Vistisen, Dorte ; Nørgaard, Kirsten. / Study protocol for optimising glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes treated with multiple daily insulin injections : intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring, carbohydrate counting with automated bolus calculation, or both? A randomised controlled trial. In: BMJ Open. 2020 ; Vol. 10, No. 4.

Bibtex

@article{802cf64683c141ba89a8bba1fed987c6,
title = "Study protocol for optimising glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes treated with multiple daily insulin injections: intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring, carbohydrate counting with automated bolus calculation, or both? A randomised controlled trial",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: There are beneficial effects of advanced carbohydrate counting with an automatic bolus calculator (ABC) and intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) in persons with type 1 diabetes. We aim to compare the effects of isCGM, training in carbohydrate counting with ABC and the combination of the two concepts with standard care.METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multi-centre randomised controlled trial with inclusion criteria: ≥18 years, type 1 diabetes ≥1 year, injection therapy, HbA1c >53 mmol/mol, whereas daily use of carbohydrate counting and/or CGM/isCGM wear are exclusion criteria. Inclusion was initiated in October 2018 and is ongoing. Eligible persons are randomised into four groups: standard care, ABC, isCGM or ABC+isCGM. Devices used are FreeStyle Libre Flash and smart phone diabetes application mySugr. Participants attend group courses according to treatment allocation with different educational contents. Participants are followed for 26 weeks with clinical visits and telephone consultations. At baseline and at study end, participants wear blinded CGM, have blood samples performed and fill in questionnaires on person-related outcomes, and at baseline also on personality traits and hypoglycaemia awareness. The primary outcome is the difference in time spent in normoglycaemia (4-10 mmol/L) at study end versus baseline between the isCGM group and the standard care group. Secondary outcomes will also be analysed. Results are expected in 2020.ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Regional Scientific Ethics Committee approval (H-17040573). Results will be sought disseminated at conferences and in high impact journals.Trial registration numberClinicalTrial.gov registry (NCT03682237).",
author = "Secher, {Anna Lilja} and Ulrik Pedersen-Bjergaard and Svendsen, {Ole Lander} and Birthe Gade-Rasmussen and Almdal, {Thomas P} and Liv D{\o}rflinger and Dorte Vistisen and Kirsten N{\o}rgaard",
note = "{\textcopyright} Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.",
year = "2020",
month = apr,
day = "27",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036474",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Study protocol for optimising glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes treated with multiple daily insulin injections

T2 - intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring, carbohydrate counting with automated bolus calculation, or both? A randomised controlled trial

AU - Secher, Anna Lilja

AU - Pedersen-Bjergaard, Ulrik

AU - Svendsen, Ole Lander

AU - Gade-Rasmussen, Birthe

AU - Almdal, Thomas P

AU - Dørflinger, Liv

AU - Vistisen, Dorte

AU - Nørgaard, Kirsten

N1 - © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

PY - 2020/4/27

Y1 - 2020/4/27

N2 - INTRODUCTION: There are beneficial effects of advanced carbohydrate counting with an automatic bolus calculator (ABC) and intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) in persons with type 1 diabetes. We aim to compare the effects of isCGM, training in carbohydrate counting with ABC and the combination of the two concepts with standard care.METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multi-centre randomised controlled trial with inclusion criteria: ≥18 years, type 1 diabetes ≥1 year, injection therapy, HbA1c >53 mmol/mol, whereas daily use of carbohydrate counting and/or CGM/isCGM wear are exclusion criteria. Inclusion was initiated in October 2018 and is ongoing. Eligible persons are randomised into four groups: standard care, ABC, isCGM or ABC+isCGM. Devices used are FreeStyle Libre Flash and smart phone diabetes application mySugr. Participants attend group courses according to treatment allocation with different educational contents. Participants are followed for 26 weeks with clinical visits and telephone consultations. At baseline and at study end, participants wear blinded CGM, have blood samples performed and fill in questionnaires on person-related outcomes, and at baseline also on personality traits and hypoglycaemia awareness. The primary outcome is the difference in time spent in normoglycaemia (4-10 mmol/L) at study end versus baseline between the isCGM group and the standard care group. Secondary outcomes will also be analysed. Results are expected in 2020.ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Regional Scientific Ethics Committee approval (H-17040573). Results will be sought disseminated at conferences and in high impact journals.Trial registration numberClinicalTrial.gov registry (NCT03682237).

AB - INTRODUCTION: There are beneficial effects of advanced carbohydrate counting with an automatic bolus calculator (ABC) and intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) in persons with type 1 diabetes. We aim to compare the effects of isCGM, training in carbohydrate counting with ABC and the combination of the two concepts with standard care.METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multi-centre randomised controlled trial with inclusion criteria: ≥18 years, type 1 diabetes ≥1 year, injection therapy, HbA1c >53 mmol/mol, whereas daily use of carbohydrate counting and/or CGM/isCGM wear are exclusion criteria. Inclusion was initiated in October 2018 and is ongoing. Eligible persons are randomised into four groups: standard care, ABC, isCGM or ABC+isCGM. Devices used are FreeStyle Libre Flash and smart phone diabetes application mySugr. Participants attend group courses according to treatment allocation with different educational contents. Participants are followed for 26 weeks with clinical visits and telephone consultations. At baseline and at study end, participants wear blinded CGM, have blood samples performed and fill in questionnaires on person-related outcomes, and at baseline also on personality traits and hypoglycaemia awareness. The primary outcome is the difference in time spent in normoglycaemia (4-10 mmol/L) at study end versus baseline between the isCGM group and the standard care group. Secondary outcomes will also be analysed. Results are expected in 2020.ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Regional Scientific Ethics Committee approval (H-17040573). Results will be sought disseminated at conferences and in high impact journals.Trial registration numberClinicalTrial.gov registry (NCT03682237).

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036474

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036474

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32345699

VL - 10

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 4

M1 - e036474

ER -

ID: 251257222