Acute changes in motor cortical excitability during slow oscillatory and constant anodal transcranial direct current stimulation

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Acute changes in motor cortical excitability during slow oscillatory and constant anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. / Bergmann, Til Ole; Groppa, Sergiu; Seeger, Markus; Mölle, Matthias; Marshall, Lisa; Siebner, Hartwig Roman.

In: Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol. 102, No. 4, 2009, p. 2303-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Bergmann, TO, Groppa, S, Seeger, M, Mölle, M, Marshall, L & Siebner, HR 2009, 'Acute changes in motor cortical excitability during slow oscillatory and constant anodal transcranial direct current stimulation', Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 2303-11. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00437.2009

APA

Bergmann, T. O., Groppa, S., Seeger, M., Mölle, M., Marshall, L., & Siebner, H. R. (2009). Acute changes in motor cortical excitability during slow oscillatory and constant anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 102(4), 2303-11. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00437.2009

Vancouver

Bergmann TO, Groppa S, Seeger M, Mölle M, Marshall L, Siebner HR. Acute changes in motor cortical excitability during slow oscillatory and constant anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2009;102(4):2303-11. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00437.2009

Author

Bergmann, Til Ole ; Groppa, Sergiu ; Seeger, Markus ; Mölle, Matthias ; Marshall, Lisa ; Siebner, Hartwig Roman. / Acute changes in motor cortical excitability during slow oscillatory and constant anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. In: Journal of Neurophysiology. 2009 ; Vol. 102, No. 4. pp. 2303-11.

Bibtex

@article{b6ae2f50aab711df928f000ea68e967b,
title = "Acute changes in motor cortical excitability during slow oscillatory and constant anodal transcranial direct current stimulation",
abstract = "Transcranial oscillatory current stimulation has recently emerged as a noninvasive technique that can interact with ongoing endogenous rhythms of the human brain. Yet, there is still little knowledge on how time-varied exogenous currents acutely modulate cortical excitability. In ten healthy individuals we used on-line single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to search for systematic shifts in corticospinal excitability during anodal sleeplike 0.8-Hz slow oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation (so-tDCS). In separate sessions, we repeatedly applied 30-s trials (two blocks at 20 min) of either anodal so-tDCS or constant tDCS (c-tDCS) to the primary motor hand area during quiet wakefulness. Simultaneously and time-locked to different phase angles of the slow oscillation, motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) as an index of corticospinal excitability were obtained in the contralateral hand muscles 10, 20, and 30 s after the onset of tDCS. MEPs were also measured off-line before, between, and after both stimulation blocks to detect any lasting excitability shifts. Both tDCS modes increased MEP amplitudes during stimulation with an attenuation of the facilitatory effect toward the end of a 30-s tDCS trial. No phase-locking of corticospinal excitability to the exogenous oscillation was observed during so-tDCS. Off-line TMS revealed that both c-tDCS and so-tDCS resulted in a lasting excitability increase. The individual magnitude of MEP facilitation during the first tDCS trials predicted the lasting MEP facilitation found after tDCS. We conclude that sleep slow oscillation-like excitability changes cannot be actively imposed on the awake cortex with so-tDCS, but phase-independent on-line as well as off-line facilitation can reliably be induced.",
author = "Bergmann, {Til Ole} and Sergiu Groppa and Markus Seeger and Matthias M{\"o}lle and Lisa Marshall and Siebner, {Hartwig Roman}",
note = "Keywords: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Electric Stimulation; Evoked Potentials, Motor; Hand; Humans; Linear Models; Male; Motor Cortex; Muscle, Skeletal; Periodicity; Pyramidal Tracts; Questionnaires; Sleep; Time Factors; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; Wakefulness; Young Adult",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1152/jn.00437.2009",
language = "English",
volume = "102",
pages = "2303--11",
journal = "Journal of Neurophysiology",
issn = "0022-3077",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acute changes in motor cortical excitability during slow oscillatory and constant anodal transcranial direct current stimulation

AU - Bergmann, Til Ole

AU - Groppa, Sergiu

AU - Seeger, Markus

AU - Mölle, Matthias

AU - Marshall, Lisa

AU - Siebner, Hartwig Roman

N1 - Keywords: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Electric Stimulation; Evoked Potentials, Motor; Hand; Humans; Linear Models; Male; Motor Cortex; Muscle, Skeletal; Periodicity; Pyramidal Tracts; Questionnaires; Sleep; Time Factors; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; Wakefulness; Young Adult

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Transcranial oscillatory current stimulation has recently emerged as a noninvasive technique that can interact with ongoing endogenous rhythms of the human brain. Yet, there is still little knowledge on how time-varied exogenous currents acutely modulate cortical excitability. In ten healthy individuals we used on-line single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to search for systematic shifts in corticospinal excitability during anodal sleeplike 0.8-Hz slow oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation (so-tDCS). In separate sessions, we repeatedly applied 30-s trials (two blocks at 20 min) of either anodal so-tDCS or constant tDCS (c-tDCS) to the primary motor hand area during quiet wakefulness. Simultaneously and time-locked to different phase angles of the slow oscillation, motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) as an index of corticospinal excitability were obtained in the contralateral hand muscles 10, 20, and 30 s after the onset of tDCS. MEPs were also measured off-line before, between, and after both stimulation blocks to detect any lasting excitability shifts. Both tDCS modes increased MEP amplitudes during stimulation with an attenuation of the facilitatory effect toward the end of a 30-s tDCS trial. No phase-locking of corticospinal excitability to the exogenous oscillation was observed during so-tDCS. Off-line TMS revealed that both c-tDCS and so-tDCS resulted in a lasting excitability increase. The individual magnitude of MEP facilitation during the first tDCS trials predicted the lasting MEP facilitation found after tDCS. We conclude that sleep slow oscillation-like excitability changes cannot be actively imposed on the awake cortex with so-tDCS, but phase-independent on-line as well as off-line facilitation can reliably be induced.

AB - Transcranial oscillatory current stimulation has recently emerged as a noninvasive technique that can interact with ongoing endogenous rhythms of the human brain. Yet, there is still little knowledge on how time-varied exogenous currents acutely modulate cortical excitability. In ten healthy individuals we used on-line single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to search for systematic shifts in corticospinal excitability during anodal sleeplike 0.8-Hz slow oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation (so-tDCS). In separate sessions, we repeatedly applied 30-s trials (two blocks at 20 min) of either anodal so-tDCS or constant tDCS (c-tDCS) to the primary motor hand area during quiet wakefulness. Simultaneously and time-locked to different phase angles of the slow oscillation, motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) as an index of corticospinal excitability were obtained in the contralateral hand muscles 10, 20, and 30 s after the onset of tDCS. MEPs were also measured off-line before, between, and after both stimulation blocks to detect any lasting excitability shifts. Both tDCS modes increased MEP amplitudes during stimulation with an attenuation of the facilitatory effect toward the end of a 30-s tDCS trial. No phase-locking of corticospinal excitability to the exogenous oscillation was observed during so-tDCS. Off-line TMS revealed that both c-tDCS and so-tDCS resulted in a lasting excitability increase. The individual magnitude of MEP facilitation during the first tDCS trials predicted the lasting MEP facilitation found after tDCS. We conclude that sleep slow oscillation-like excitability changes cannot be actively imposed on the awake cortex with so-tDCS, but phase-independent on-line as well as off-line facilitation can reliably be induced.

U2 - 10.1152/jn.00437.2009

DO - 10.1152/jn.00437.2009

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 19692511

VL - 102

SP - 2303

EP - 2311

JO - Journal of Neurophysiology

JF - Journal of Neurophysiology

SN - 0022-3077

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 21454257