Designing drug occupancy studies with PET neuroimaging: Sample size, occupancy ranges and analytical methods

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

  • Fulltext

    Final published version, 1.22 MB, PDF document

  • Gjertrud Louise Laurell
  • Pontus Plavén-Sigray
  • Claus Svarer
  • R. Todd Ogden
  • Knudsen, Gitte Moos
  • Martin Schain

Molecular neuroimaging is today considered essential for evaluation of novel CNS drugs; it is used to quantify blood-brain barrier permeability, verify interaction with key target and determine the drug dose resulting in 50% occupancy, IC50. In spite of this, there has been limited data available to inform on how to optimize study designs. Through simulations, we here evaluate how IC50 estimation is affected by the (i) range of drug doses administered, (ii) number of subjects included, and (iii) level of noise in the plasma drug concentration measurements. Receptor occupancy is determined from PET distribution volumes using two different methods: the Lassen plot and Likelihood estimation of occupancy (LEO). We also introduce and evaluate a new likelihood-based estimator for direct estimation of IC50 from PET distribution volumes. For estimation of IC50, we find very limited added benefit in scanning individuals who are given drug doses corresponding to less than 40% receptor occupancy. In the range of typical PET sample sizes (5–20 subjects) each extra individual clearly reduces the error of the IC50 estimate. In all simulations, likelihood-based methods gave more precise IC50 estimates than the Lassen plot; four times the number of subjects were required for the Lassen plot to reach the same IC50 precision as LEO.

Original languageEnglish
Article number119620
JournalNeuroImage
Volume263
Number of pages8
ISSN1053-8119
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022

    Research areas

  • IC, Kinetic modeling, Lassen plot, PET study design, Receptor occupancy, [C]Cimbi-36

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk


No data available

ID: 321645054