Influence of Waveform and Current Direction on Short-Interval Intracortical Facilitation: A Paired-Pulse TMS Study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Influence of Waveform and Current Direction on Short-Interval Intracortical Facilitation : A Paired-Pulse TMS Study . / Delvendahl, Igor; Lindemann, Hannes; Jung, Nikolai H; Pechmann, Astrid; Siebner, Hartwig R; Mall, Volker.

In: Brain Stimulation, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2014, p. 49-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Delvendahl, I, Lindemann, H, Jung, NH, Pechmann, A, Siebner, HR & Mall, V 2014, 'Influence of Waveform and Current Direction on Short-Interval Intracortical Facilitation: A Paired-Pulse TMS Study ', Brain Stimulation, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2013.08.002

APA

Delvendahl, I., Lindemann, H., Jung, N. H., Pechmann, A., Siebner, H. R., & Mall, V. (2014). Influence of Waveform and Current Direction on Short-Interval Intracortical Facilitation: A Paired-Pulse TMS Study . Brain Stimulation, 7(1), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2013.08.002

Vancouver

Delvendahl I, Lindemann H, Jung NH, Pechmann A, Siebner HR, Mall V. Influence of Waveform and Current Direction on Short-Interval Intracortical Facilitation: A Paired-Pulse TMS Study . Brain Stimulation. 2014;7(1):49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2013.08.002

Author

Delvendahl, Igor ; Lindemann, Hannes ; Jung, Nikolai H ; Pechmann, Astrid ; Siebner, Hartwig R ; Mall, Volker. / Influence of Waveform and Current Direction on Short-Interval Intracortical Facilitation : A Paired-Pulse TMS Study . In: Brain Stimulation. 2014 ; Vol. 7, No. 1. pp. 49-58.

Bibtex

@article{e7247d8ba879476da158352c5915c2e0,
title = "Influence of Waveform and Current Direction on Short-Interval Intracortical Facilitation: A Paired-Pulse TMS Study ",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the human primary motor hand area (M1-HAND) can produce multiple descending volleys in fast-conducting corticospinal neurons, especially so-called indirect waves (I-waves) resulting from trans-synaptic excitation. Facilitatory interaction between these I-waves can be studied non-invasively using a paired-pulse paradigm referred to as short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF).OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: We examined whether SICF depends on waveform and current direction of the TMS pulses.METHODS: In young healthy volunteers, we applied single- and paired-pulse TMS to M1-HAND. We probed SICF by pairs of monophasic or half-sine pulses at suprathreshold stimulation intensity and inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) between 1.0 and 5.0 ms. For monophasic paired-pulse stimulation, both pulses had either a posterior-anterior (PA) or anterior-posterior (AP) current direction (AP-AP or PA-PA), whereas current direction was reversed between first and second pulse for half-sine paired-pulse stimulation (PA-AP and AP-PA).RESULTS: Monophasic AP-AP stimulation resulted in stronger early SICF at 1.4 ms relative to late SICF at 2.8 and 4.4 ms, whereas monophasic PA-PA stimulation produced SICF of comparable size at all three peaks. With half-sine stimulation the third SICF peak was reduced for PA-AP current orientation compared with AP-PA.CONCLUSION: SICF elicited using monophasic as well as half-sine pulses is affected by current direction at clearly suprathreshold intensities. The impact of current orientation is stronger for monophasic compared with half-sine pulses. The direction-specific effect of paired-pulse TMS on the strength of early versus late SICF shows that different cortical circuits mediate early and late SICF.",
keywords = "Adult, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Female, Humans, Male, Motor Cortex, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Young Adult",
author = "Igor Delvendahl and Hannes Lindemann and Jung, {Nikolai H} and Astrid Pechmann and Siebner, {Hartwig R} and Volker Mall",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.brs.2013.08.002",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "49--58",
journal = "Brain Stimulation",
issn = "1935-861X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of Waveform and Current Direction on Short-Interval Intracortical Facilitation

T2 - A Paired-Pulse TMS Study

AU - Delvendahl, Igor

AU - Lindemann, Hannes

AU - Jung, Nikolai H

AU - Pechmann, Astrid

AU - Siebner, Hartwig R

AU - Mall, Volker

N1 - Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - BACKGROUND: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the human primary motor hand area (M1-HAND) can produce multiple descending volleys in fast-conducting corticospinal neurons, especially so-called indirect waves (I-waves) resulting from trans-synaptic excitation. Facilitatory interaction between these I-waves can be studied non-invasively using a paired-pulse paradigm referred to as short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF).OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: We examined whether SICF depends on waveform and current direction of the TMS pulses.METHODS: In young healthy volunteers, we applied single- and paired-pulse TMS to M1-HAND. We probed SICF by pairs of monophasic or half-sine pulses at suprathreshold stimulation intensity and inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) between 1.0 and 5.0 ms. For monophasic paired-pulse stimulation, both pulses had either a posterior-anterior (PA) or anterior-posterior (AP) current direction (AP-AP or PA-PA), whereas current direction was reversed between first and second pulse for half-sine paired-pulse stimulation (PA-AP and AP-PA).RESULTS: Monophasic AP-AP stimulation resulted in stronger early SICF at 1.4 ms relative to late SICF at 2.8 and 4.4 ms, whereas monophasic PA-PA stimulation produced SICF of comparable size at all three peaks. With half-sine stimulation the third SICF peak was reduced for PA-AP current orientation compared with AP-PA.CONCLUSION: SICF elicited using monophasic as well as half-sine pulses is affected by current direction at clearly suprathreshold intensities. The impact of current orientation is stronger for monophasic compared with half-sine pulses. The direction-specific effect of paired-pulse TMS on the strength of early versus late SICF shows that different cortical circuits mediate early and late SICF.

AB - BACKGROUND: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the human primary motor hand area (M1-HAND) can produce multiple descending volleys in fast-conducting corticospinal neurons, especially so-called indirect waves (I-waves) resulting from trans-synaptic excitation. Facilitatory interaction between these I-waves can be studied non-invasively using a paired-pulse paradigm referred to as short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF).OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: We examined whether SICF depends on waveform and current direction of the TMS pulses.METHODS: In young healthy volunteers, we applied single- and paired-pulse TMS to M1-HAND. We probed SICF by pairs of monophasic or half-sine pulses at suprathreshold stimulation intensity and inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) between 1.0 and 5.0 ms. For monophasic paired-pulse stimulation, both pulses had either a posterior-anterior (PA) or anterior-posterior (AP) current direction (AP-AP or PA-PA), whereas current direction was reversed between first and second pulse for half-sine paired-pulse stimulation (PA-AP and AP-PA).RESULTS: Monophasic AP-AP stimulation resulted in stronger early SICF at 1.4 ms relative to late SICF at 2.8 and 4.4 ms, whereas monophasic PA-PA stimulation produced SICF of comparable size at all three peaks. With half-sine stimulation the third SICF peak was reduced for PA-AP current orientation compared with AP-PA.CONCLUSION: SICF elicited using monophasic as well as half-sine pulses is affected by current direction at clearly suprathreshold intensities. The impact of current orientation is stronger for monophasic compared with half-sine pulses. The direction-specific effect of paired-pulse TMS on the strength of early versus late SICF shows that different cortical circuits mediate early and late SICF.

KW - Adult

KW - Evoked Potentials, Motor

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Motor Cortex

KW - Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

KW - Young Adult

U2 - 10.1016/j.brs.2013.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.brs.2013.08.002

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 24075915

VL - 7

SP - 49

EP - 58

JO - Brain Stimulation

JF - Brain Stimulation

SN - 1935-861X

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 138557686