Inhibitory control in obsessive compulsive disorder: A systematic review and activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Standard

Inhibitory control in obsessive compulsive disorder : A systematic review and activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. / Funch Uhre, Valdemar; Melissa Larsen, Kit; Marc Herz, Damian; Baaré, William; Katrine Pagsberg, Anne; Roman Siebner, Hartwig.

In: NeuroImage: Clinical, Vol. 36, 103268, 2022.

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Funch Uhre, V, Melissa Larsen, K, Marc Herz, D, Baaré, W, Katrine Pagsberg, A & Roman Siebner, H 2022, 'Inhibitory control in obsessive compulsive disorder: A systematic review and activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies', NeuroImage: Clinical, vol. 36, 103268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103268

APA

Funch Uhre, V., Melissa Larsen, K., Marc Herz, D., Baaré, W., Katrine Pagsberg, A., & Roman Siebner, H. (2022). Inhibitory control in obsessive compulsive disorder: A systematic review and activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. NeuroImage: Clinical, 36, [103268]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103268

Vancouver

Funch Uhre V, Melissa Larsen K, Marc Herz D, Baaré W, Katrine Pagsberg A, Roman Siebner H. Inhibitory control in obsessive compulsive disorder: A systematic review and activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. NeuroImage: Clinical. 2022;36. 103268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103268

Author

Funch Uhre, Valdemar ; Melissa Larsen, Kit ; Marc Herz, Damian ; Baaré, William ; Katrine Pagsberg, Anne ; Roman Siebner, Hartwig. / Inhibitory control in obsessive compulsive disorder : A systematic review and activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. In: NeuroImage: Clinical. 2022 ; Vol. 36.

Bibtex

@article{7136bf5394ba4972a3192ec64a588f62,
title = "Inhibitory control in obsessive compulsive disorder: A systematic review and activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies",
abstract = "Background: Patients with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) often show deficits in inhibitory control, which may underlie poor control over obsessions and compulsions. Several functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiments utilizing a variety of tasks have investigated the neural correlates of inhibitory control in OCD. Evidence from existing meta-analyses suggests aberrant activation of regions in fronto-striatal circuits during inhibitory control. However, new fMRI articles have since been published, and a more rigorous methodology for neuroimaging meta-analyses is now available. Objectives: First, to reevaluate the evidence for abnormal brain activation during performance of inhibitory control tasks in OCD while adhering to current best practices for meta-analyses, and second, to extend previous findings by separately assessing different subprocesses of inhibitory control. Method: We systematically searched Web of Knowledge, ScienceDirect, Scopus, PubMed and the functional BrainMap database for fMRI articles that compared activation during performance of inhibitory control tasks in patients with OCD and healthy control (HC) subjects. Thirty-five experiments from 21 articles met our criteria for inclusion. We first performed activation-likelihood-estimation meta-analyses to elucidate brain areas in which case-control activation differences converged across articles and tasks. We then aimed to extend previous work by separately evaluating experiments requiring inhibition of a prepotent response without execution of an alternative response (i.e., response inhibition) and experiments requiring inhibition of a prepotent response and execution of an alternative response (i.e., cognitive inhibition). Results: The 35 experiments included a total of 394 patients and 410 controls. We did not find evidence of abnormal brain activation in OCD during inhibitory control when pooling data from all experiments. Analysis restricted to cognitive inhibition experiments showed abnormal activation of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC; P = .04, cluster-level familywise error-corrected, cluster volume of 824 mm3). We did not have sufficient data to evaluate response inhibition experiments separately. Conclusion: Findings of abnormal brain activation in OCD from different inhibitory control tasks do not appear to converge on the same brain regions, but the dACC may be implicated in abnormal cognitive inhibition. Our findings highlight a need for experiments that specifically target subprocesses of inhibitory control to achieve a more differentiated understanding of the neural correlates for impaired inhibitory control in OCD.",
keywords = "Activation likelihood estimation, Anterior cingulate cortex, Cognitive inhibition, fMRI, Inhibitory control, OCD, Response inhibition",
author = "{Funch Uhre}, Valdemar and {Melissa Larsen}, Kit and {Marc Herz}, Damian and William Baar{\'e} and {Katrine Pagsberg}, Anne and {Roman Siebner}, Hartwig",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103268",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
journal = "NeuroImage: Clinical",
issn = "2213-1582",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inhibitory control in obsessive compulsive disorder

T2 - A systematic review and activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies

AU - Funch Uhre, Valdemar

AU - Melissa Larsen, Kit

AU - Marc Herz, Damian

AU - Baaré, William

AU - Katrine Pagsberg, Anne

AU - Roman Siebner, Hartwig

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Background: Patients with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) often show deficits in inhibitory control, which may underlie poor control over obsessions and compulsions. Several functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiments utilizing a variety of tasks have investigated the neural correlates of inhibitory control in OCD. Evidence from existing meta-analyses suggests aberrant activation of regions in fronto-striatal circuits during inhibitory control. However, new fMRI articles have since been published, and a more rigorous methodology for neuroimaging meta-analyses is now available. Objectives: First, to reevaluate the evidence for abnormal brain activation during performance of inhibitory control tasks in OCD while adhering to current best practices for meta-analyses, and second, to extend previous findings by separately assessing different subprocesses of inhibitory control. Method: We systematically searched Web of Knowledge, ScienceDirect, Scopus, PubMed and the functional BrainMap database for fMRI articles that compared activation during performance of inhibitory control tasks in patients with OCD and healthy control (HC) subjects. Thirty-five experiments from 21 articles met our criteria for inclusion. We first performed activation-likelihood-estimation meta-analyses to elucidate brain areas in which case-control activation differences converged across articles and tasks. We then aimed to extend previous work by separately evaluating experiments requiring inhibition of a prepotent response without execution of an alternative response (i.e., response inhibition) and experiments requiring inhibition of a prepotent response and execution of an alternative response (i.e., cognitive inhibition). Results: The 35 experiments included a total of 394 patients and 410 controls. We did not find evidence of abnormal brain activation in OCD during inhibitory control when pooling data from all experiments. Analysis restricted to cognitive inhibition experiments showed abnormal activation of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC; P = .04, cluster-level familywise error-corrected, cluster volume of 824 mm3). We did not have sufficient data to evaluate response inhibition experiments separately. Conclusion: Findings of abnormal brain activation in OCD from different inhibitory control tasks do not appear to converge on the same brain regions, but the dACC may be implicated in abnormal cognitive inhibition. Our findings highlight a need for experiments that specifically target subprocesses of inhibitory control to achieve a more differentiated understanding of the neural correlates for impaired inhibitory control in OCD.

AB - Background: Patients with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) often show deficits in inhibitory control, which may underlie poor control over obsessions and compulsions. Several functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiments utilizing a variety of tasks have investigated the neural correlates of inhibitory control in OCD. Evidence from existing meta-analyses suggests aberrant activation of regions in fronto-striatal circuits during inhibitory control. However, new fMRI articles have since been published, and a more rigorous methodology for neuroimaging meta-analyses is now available. Objectives: First, to reevaluate the evidence for abnormal brain activation during performance of inhibitory control tasks in OCD while adhering to current best practices for meta-analyses, and second, to extend previous findings by separately assessing different subprocesses of inhibitory control. Method: We systematically searched Web of Knowledge, ScienceDirect, Scopus, PubMed and the functional BrainMap database for fMRI articles that compared activation during performance of inhibitory control tasks in patients with OCD and healthy control (HC) subjects. Thirty-five experiments from 21 articles met our criteria for inclusion. We first performed activation-likelihood-estimation meta-analyses to elucidate brain areas in which case-control activation differences converged across articles and tasks. We then aimed to extend previous work by separately evaluating experiments requiring inhibition of a prepotent response without execution of an alternative response (i.e., response inhibition) and experiments requiring inhibition of a prepotent response and execution of an alternative response (i.e., cognitive inhibition). Results: The 35 experiments included a total of 394 patients and 410 controls. We did not find evidence of abnormal brain activation in OCD during inhibitory control when pooling data from all experiments. Analysis restricted to cognitive inhibition experiments showed abnormal activation of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC; P = .04, cluster-level familywise error-corrected, cluster volume of 824 mm3). We did not have sufficient data to evaluate response inhibition experiments separately. Conclusion: Findings of abnormal brain activation in OCD from different inhibitory control tasks do not appear to converge on the same brain regions, but the dACC may be implicated in abnormal cognitive inhibition. Our findings highlight a need for experiments that specifically target subprocesses of inhibitory control to achieve a more differentiated understanding of the neural correlates for impaired inhibitory control in OCD.

KW - Activation likelihood estimation

KW - Anterior cingulate cortex

KW - Cognitive inhibition

KW - fMRI

KW - Inhibitory control

KW - OCD

KW - Response inhibition

U2 - 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103268

DO - 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103268

M3 - Review

C2 - 36451370

AN - SCOPUS:85141976439

VL - 36

JO - NeuroImage: Clinical

JF - NeuroImage: Clinical

SN - 2213-1582

M1 - 103268

ER -

ID: 342566797