Is negative self-referent bias an endophenotype for depression? An fMRI study of emotional self-referent words in twins at high vs. low risk of depression

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Is negative self-referent bias an endophenotype for depression? An fMRI study of emotional self-referent words in twins at high vs. low risk of depression. / Miskowiak, Kamilla Woznica; Larsen, J E; Harmer, C J; Siebner, Hartwig Roman; Kessing, Lars Vedel; Macoveanu, J; Vinberg, Maj.

In: Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol. 226, 15.01.2018, p. 267-273.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Miskowiak, KW, Larsen, JE, Harmer, CJ, Siebner, HR, Kessing, LV, Macoveanu, J & Vinberg, M 2018, 'Is negative self-referent bias an endophenotype for depression? An fMRI study of emotional self-referent words in twins at high vs. low risk of depression', Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 226, pp. 267-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.10.013

APA

Miskowiak, K. W., Larsen, J. E., Harmer, C. J., Siebner, H. R., Kessing, L. V., Macoveanu, J., & Vinberg, M. (2018). Is negative self-referent bias an endophenotype for depression? An fMRI study of emotional self-referent words in twins at high vs. low risk of depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 226, 267-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.10.013

Vancouver

Miskowiak KW, Larsen JE, Harmer CJ, Siebner HR, Kessing LV, Macoveanu J et al. Is negative self-referent bias an endophenotype for depression? An fMRI study of emotional self-referent words in twins at high vs. low risk of depression. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2018 Jan 15;226:267-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.10.013

Author

Miskowiak, Kamilla Woznica ; Larsen, J E ; Harmer, C J ; Siebner, Hartwig Roman ; Kessing, Lars Vedel ; Macoveanu, J ; Vinberg, Maj. / Is negative self-referent bias an endophenotype for depression? An fMRI study of emotional self-referent words in twins at high vs. low risk of depression. In: Journal of Affective Disorders. 2018 ; Vol. 226. pp. 267-273.

Bibtex

@article{1d099b2be63a42a280783e6f5eb9ea6f,
title = "Is negative self-referent bias an endophenotype for depression? An fMRI study of emotional self-referent words in twins at high vs. low risk of depression",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Negative cognitive bias and aberrant neural processing of self-referent emotional words seem to be trait-marks of depression. However, it is unclear whether these neurocognitive changes are present in unaffected first-degree relatives and constitute an illness endophenotype.METHODS: Fifty-three healthy, never-depressed monozygotic or dizygotic twins with a co-twin history of depression (high-risk group: n = 26) or no first-degree family history of depression (low-risk group: n = 27) underwent neurocognitive testing and functional magnetic imaging (fMRI) as part of a follow-up cohort study. Participants performed a self-referent emotional word categorisation task and free word recall task followed by a recognition task during fMRI. Participants also completed questionnaires assessing mood, personality traits and coping strategies.RESULTS: High-risk and low-risk twins (age, mean ± SD: 40 ± 11) were well-balanced for demographic variables, mood, coping and neuroticism. High-risk twins showed lower accuracy during self-referent categorisation of emotional words independent of valence and more false recollections of negative words than low-risk twins during free recall. Functional MRI yielded no differences between high-risk and low-risk twins in retrieval-specific neural activity for positive or negative words or during the recognition of negative versus positive words within the hippocampus or prefrontal cortex.CONCLUSIONS: The subtle display of negative recall bias is consistent with the hypothesis that self-referent negative memory bias is an endophenotype for depression. High-risk twins' lower categorisation accuracy adds to the evidence for valence-independent cognitive deficits in individuals at familial risk for depression.",
keywords = "Adult, Brain Mapping, Cognition Disorders, Cohort Studies, Depressive Disorder/physiopathology, Emotions/physiology, Endophenotypes, Female, Hippocampus/physiology, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mental Recall, Prefrontal Cortex/physiology, Twins, Dizygotic, Verbal Behavior/physiology, Depression, Cognition, Familial risk, Endophenotype, FMRI",
author = "Miskowiak, {Kamilla Woznica} and Larsen, {J E} and Harmer, {C J} and Siebner, {Hartwig Roman} and Kessing, {Lars Vedel} and J Macoveanu and Maj Vinberg",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
year = "2018",
month = jan,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jad.2017.10.013",
language = "English",
volume = "226",
pages = "267--273",
journal = "Journal of Affective Disorders",
issn = "0165-0327",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is negative self-referent bias an endophenotype for depression? An fMRI study of emotional self-referent words in twins at high vs. low risk of depression

AU - Miskowiak, Kamilla Woznica

AU - Larsen, J E

AU - Harmer, C J

AU - Siebner, Hartwig Roman

AU - Kessing, Lars Vedel

AU - Macoveanu, J

AU - Vinberg, Maj

N1 - Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PY - 2018/1/15

Y1 - 2018/1/15

N2 - BACKGROUND: Negative cognitive bias and aberrant neural processing of self-referent emotional words seem to be trait-marks of depression. However, it is unclear whether these neurocognitive changes are present in unaffected first-degree relatives and constitute an illness endophenotype.METHODS: Fifty-three healthy, never-depressed monozygotic or dizygotic twins with a co-twin history of depression (high-risk group: n = 26) or no first-degree family history of depression (low-risk group: n = 27) underwent neurocognitive testing and functional magnetic imaging (fMRI) as part of a follow-up cohort study. Participants performed a self-referent emotional word categorisation task and free word recall task followed by a recognition task during fMRI. Participants also completed questionnaires assessing mood, personality traits and coping strategies.RESULTS: High-risk and low-risk twins (age, mean ± SD: 40 ± 11) were well-balanced for demographic variables, mood, coping and neuroticism. High-risk twins showed lower accuracy during self-referent categorisation of emotional words independent of valence and more false recollections of negative words than low-risk twins during free recall. Functional MRI yielded no differences between high-risk and low-risk twins in retrieval-specific neural activity for positive or negative words or during the recognition of negative versus positive words within the hippocampus or prefrontal cortex.CONCLUSIONS: The subtle display of negative recall bias is consistent with the hypothesis that self-referent negative memory bias is an endophenotype for depression. High-risk twins' lower categorisation accuracy adds to the evidence for valence-independent cognitive deficits in individuals at familial risk for depression.

AB - BACKGROUND: Negative cognitive bias and aberrant neural processing of self-referent emotional words seem to be trait-marks of depression. However, it is unclear whether these neurocognitive changes are present in unaffected first-degree relatives and constitute an illness endophenotype.METHODS: Fifty-three healthy, never-depressed monozygotic or dizygotic twins with a co-twin history of depression (high-risk group: n = 26) or no first-degree family history of depression (low-risk group: n = 27) underwent neurocognitive testing and functional magnetic imaging (fMRI) as part of a follow-up cohort study. Participants performed a self-referent emotional word categorisation task and free word recall task followed by a recognition task during fMRI. Participants also completed questionnaires assessing mood, personality traits and coping strategies.RESULTS: High-risk and low-risk twins (age, mean ± SD: 40 ± 11) were well-balanced for demographic variables, mood, coping and neuroticism. High-risk twins showed lower accuracy during self-referent categorisation of emotional words independent of valence and more false recollections of negative words than low-risk twins during free recall. Functional MRI yielded no differences between high-risk and low-risk twins in retrieval-specific neural activity for positive or negative words or during the recognition of negative versus positive words within the hippocampus or prefrontal cortex.CONCLUSIONS: The subtle display of negative recall bias is consistent with the hypothesis that self-referent negative memory bias is an endophenotype for depression. High-risk twins' lower categorisation accuracy adds to the evidence for valence-independent cognitive deficits in individuals at familial risk for depression.

KW - Adult

KW - Brain Mapping

KW - Cognition Disorders

KW - Cohort Studies

KW - Depressive Disorder/physiopathology

KW - Emotions/physiology

KW - Endophenotypes

KW - Female

KW - Hippocampus/physiology

KW - Humans

KW - Magnetic Resonance Imaging

KW - Male

KW - Mental Recall

KW - Prefrontal Cortex/physiology

KW - Twins, Dizygotic

KW - Verbal Behavior/physiology

KW - Depression

KW - Cognition

KW - Familial risk

KW - Endophenotype

KW - FMRI

U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2017.10.013

DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2017.10.013

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 29020651

VL - 226

SP - 267

EP - 273

JO - Journal of Affective Disorders

JF - Journal of Affective Disorders

SN - 0165-0327

ER -

ID: 184777062