New daily persistent headache: a systematic review on an enigmatic disorder

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Standard

New daily persistent headache : a systematic review on an enigmatic disorder. / Yamani, Nooshin; Olesen, Jes.

In: Journal of Headache and Pain, Vol. 20, 80, 07.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Yamani, N & Olesen, J 2019, 'New daily persistent headache: a systematic review on an enigmatic disorder', Journal of Headache and Pain, vol. 20, 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-1022-z

APA

Yamani, N., & Olesen, J. (2019). New daily persistent headache: a systematic review on an enigmatic disorder. Journal of Headache and Pain, 20, [80]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-1022-z

Vancouver

Yamani N, Olesen J. New daily persistent headache: a systematic review on an enigmatic disorder. Journal of Headache and Pain. 2019 Jul;20. 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-1022-z

Author

Yamani, Nooshin ; Olesen, Jes. / New daily persistent headache : a systematic review on an enigmatic disorder. In: Journal of Headache and Pain. 2019 ; Vol. 20.

Bibtex

@article{18a97d19e693445aaa99099c04e2f4ab,
title = "New daily persistent headache: a systematic review on an enigmatic disorder",
abstract = "Background: New daily persistent headache (NDPH) presents with a sudden onset headache which continues without remission within 24 h. Although rare, NDPH is important because it is one of the most treatment refractory primary headache disorders and can be highly disabling to the individuals. In this structured review, we describe the current knowledge of epidemiology, clinical features, trigger factors, pathophysiology, diagnosis and therapeutic options of NDPH to better understand this enigmatic disorder. Main body of the abstract: The prevalence of NDPH estimated to be 0.03% to 0.1% in the general population and is higher in children and adolescents than in adults. Individuals with NDPH can pinpoint the exact date their headache started. The pain is constant and lacks special characteristics but in some has migraine features. The exact pathogenic mechanism of NDPH is unknown, however pro-inflammatory cytokines and cervicogenic problems might play a role in its development. The diagnosis of NDPH is mainly clinical and based on a typical history, but proper laboratory investigation is needed to exclude secondary causes of headache. Regarding treatment strategy, controlled drug trials are absent. It is probably best to treat NDPH based upon the predominant headache phenotype. For patients who do not respond to common prophylactic drugs, ketamine infusion, onabotulinum toxin type A, intravenous (IV) lidocaine, IV methylprednisolone and nerve blockade are possible treatment options, but even aggressive treatment is usually ineffective. Conclusion: NDPH remains poorly understood but very burdensome for the individual. Multi-center randomized controlled trials are recommended to gain better understanding of NDPH and to establish evidence based treatments.",
keywords = "Chronic daily headache, NDPH, New daily persistent headache, Primary headache disorders",
author = "Nooshin Yamani and Jes Olesen",
year = "2019",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1186/s10194-019-1022-z",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
journal = "Journal of Headache and Pain",
issn = "1129-2369",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - New daily persistent headache

T2 - a systematic review on an enigmatic disorder

AU - Yamani, Nooshin

AU - Olesen, Jes

PY - 2019/7

Y1 - 2019/7

N2 - Background: New daily persistent headache (NDPH) presents with a sudden onset headache which continues without remission within 24 h. Although rare, NDPH is important because it is one of the most treatment refractory primary headache disorders and can be highly disabling to the individuals. In this structured review, we describe the current knowledge of epidemiology, clinical features, trigger factors, pathophysiology, diagnosis and therapeutic options of NDPH to better understand this enigmatic disorder. Main body of the abstract: The prevalence of NDPH estimated to be 0.03% to 0.1% in the general population and is higher in children and adolescents than in adults. Individuals with NDPH can pinpoint the exact date their headache started. The pain is constant and lacks special characteristics but in some has migraine features. The exact pathogenic mechanism of NDPH is unknown, however pro-inflammatory cytokines and cervicogenic problems might play a role in its development. The diagnosis of NDPH is mainly clinical and based on a typical history, but proper laboratory investigation is needed to exclude secondary causes of headache. Regarding treatment strategy, controlled drug trials are absent. It is probably best to treat NDPH based upon the predominant headache phenotype. For patients who do not respond to common prophylactic drugs, ketamine infusion, onabotulinum toxin type A, intravenous (IV) lidocaine, IV methylprednisolone and nerve blockade are possible treatment options, but even aggressive treatment is usually ineffective. Conclusion: NDPH remains poorly understood but very burdensome for the individual. Multi-center randomized controlled trials are recommended to gain better understanding of NDPH and to establish evidence based treatments.

AB - Background: New daily persistent headache (NDPH) presents with a sudden onset headache which continues without remission within 24 h. Although rare, NDPH is important because it is one of the most treatment refractory primary headache disorders and can be highly disabling to the individuals. In this structured review, we describe the current knowledge of epidemiology, clinical features, trigger factors, pathophysiology, diagnosis and therapeutic options of NDPH to better understand this enigmatic disorder. Main body of the abstract: The prevalence of NDPH estimated to be 0.03% to 0.1% in the general population and is higher in children and adolescents than in adults. Individuals with NDPH can pinpoint the exact date their headache started. The pain is constant and lacks special characteristics but in some has migraine features. The exact pathogenic mechanism of NDPH is unknown, however pro-inflammatory cytokines and cervicogenic problems might play a role in its development. The diagnosis of NDPH is mainly clinical and based on a typical history, but proper laboratory investigation is needed to exclude secondary causes of headache. Regarding treatment strategy, controlled drug trials are absent. It is probably best to treat NDPH based upon the predominant headache phenotype. For patients who do not respond to common prophylactic drugs, ketamine infusion, onabotulinum toxin type A, intravenous (IV) lidocaine, IV methylprednisolone and nerve blockade are possible treatment options, but even aggressive treatment is usually ineffective. Conclusion: NDPH remains poorly understood but very burdensome for the individual. Multi-center randomized controlled trials are recommended to gain better understanding of NDPH and to establish evidence based treatments.

KW - Chronic daily headache

KW - NDPH

KW - New daily persistent headache

KW - Primary headache disorders

U2 - 10.1186/s10194-019-1022-z

DO - 10.1186/s10194-019-1022-z

M3 - Review

C2 - 31307396

AN - SCOPUS:85069448268

VL - 20

JO - Journal of Headache and Pain

JF - Journal of Headache and Pain

SN - 1129-2369

M1 - 80

ER -

ID: 241204826