Nonspecific facilitation of responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Nonspecific facilitation of responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation. / Andersen, Birgit; Rösler, Kai M.; Lauritzen, Martin.

In: Muscle and Nerve, Vol. 22, No. 7, 27.07.1999, p. 857-863.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Andersen, B, Rösler, KM & Lauritzen, M 1999, 'Nonspecific facilitation of responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation', Muscle and Nerve, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 857-863. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199907)22:7<857::AID-MUS7>3.0.CO;2-B

APA

Andersen, B., Rösler, K. M., & Lauritzen, M. (1999). Nonspecific facilitation of responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Muscle and Nerve, 22(7), 857-863. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199907)22:7<857::AID-MUS7>3.0.CO;2-B

Vancouver

Andersen B, Rösler KM, Lauritzen M. Nonspecific facilitation of responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Muscle and Nerve. 1999 Jul 27;22(7):857-863. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199907)22:7<857::AID-MUS7>3.0.CO;2-B

Author

Andersen, Birgit ; Rösler, Kai M. ; Lauritzen, Martin. / Nonspecific facilitation of responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation. In: Muscle and Nerve. 1999 ; Vol. 22, No. 7. pp. 857-863.

Bibtex

@article{b57ef0fe862c463999dca1965d864fa2,
title = "Nonspecific facilitation of responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation",
abstract = "We examined the effect of facial muscle contraction and eye movements on motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the abductor pollicis brevis muscle (APB) evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The hypothesis was that activity of large cortical regions (face) influences the excitability of spinal motoneurons via cortical or subcortical pathways. MEPs were recorded in 12 healthy subjects during the following conditions: (1) rest; (2) facial muscle contraction; (3) eye movements; (4) 10% precontraction of the target muscle; and (5) simultaneous target muscle precontraction and facial muscle contraction. In 9 subjects, spinal motoneuron excitability was assessed by measurements of F waves during the same facilitation maneuvers. Activation of eye and facial muscles clearly facilitated MEPs from the APB. The facilitation of MEP size during nonspecific maneuvers was almost similar to that obtained by target muscle precontraction, whereas shortening of latencies was significantly smaller. The occurrence and amplitude of F waves increased in parallel with MEP size during specific and nonspecific facilitation, pointing to spinal motoneuronal threshold changes as a potential facilitatory mechanism by facial and eye muscle activation. The different MEP latencies during specific and nonspecific facilitation were not explained by different spinal motoneuron excitability, but raise the possibility that supraspinal mechanisms contributed to nonspecific facilitation.",
keywords = "F wave, Facilitation, Motor control, Motor evoked potential, Spinal excitability, Transcranial magnetic stimulation",
author = "Birgit Andersen and R{\"o}sler, {Kai M.} and Martin Lauritzen",
year = "1999",
month = jul,
day = "27",
doi = "10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199907)22:7<857::AID-MUS7>3.0.CO;2-B",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "857--863",
journal = "Muscle & Nerve",
issn = "0148-639X",
publisher = "JohnWiley & Sons, Inc.",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nonspecific facilitation of responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation

AU - Andersen, Birgit

AU - Rösler, Kai M.

AU - Lauritzen, Martin

PY - 1999/7/27

Y1 - 1999/7/27

N2 - We examined the effect of facial muscle contraction and eye movements on motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the abductor pollicis brevis muscle (APB) evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The hypothesis was that activity of large cortical regions (face) influences the excitability of spinal motoneurons via cortical or subcortical pathways. MEPs were recorded in 12 healthy subjects during the following conditions: (1) rest; (2) facial muscle contraction; (3) eye movements; (4) 10% precontraction of the target muscle; and (5) simultaneous target muscle precontraction and facial muscle contraction. In 9 subjects, spinal motoneuron excitability was assessed by measurements of F waves during the same facilitation maneuvers. Activation of eye and facial muscles clearly facilitated MEPs from the APB. The facilitation of MEP size during nonspecific maneuvers was almost similar to that obtained by target muscle precontraction, whereas shortening of latencies was significantly smaller. The occurrence and amplitude of F waves increased in parallel with MEP size during specific and nonspecific facilitation, pointing to spinal motoneuronal threshold changes as a potential facilitatory mechanism by facial and eye muscle activation. The different MEP latencies during specific and nonspecific facilitation were not explained by different spinal motoneuron excitability, but raise the possibility that supraspinal mechanisms contributed to nonspecific facilitation.

AB - We examined the effect of facial muscle contraction and eye movements on motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the abductor pollicis brevis muscle (APB) evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The hypothesis was that activity of large cortical regions (face) influences the excitability of spinal motoneurons via cortical or subcortical pathways. MEPs were recorded in 12 healthy subjects during the following conditions: (1) rest; (2) facial muscle contraction; (3) eye movements; (4) 10% precontraction of the target muscle; and (5) simultaneous target muscle precontraction and facial muscle contraction. In 9 subjects, spinal motoneuron excitability was assessed by measurements of F waves during the same facilitation maneuvers. Activation of eye and facial muscles clearly facilitated MEPs from the APB. The facilitation of MEP size during nonspecific maneuvers was almost similar to that obtained by target muscle precontraction, whereas shortening of latencies was significantly smaller. The occurrence and amplitude of F waves increased in parallel with MEP size during specific and nonspecific facilitation, pointing to spinal motoneuronal threshold changes as a potential facilitatory mechanism by facial and eye muscle activation. The different MEP latencies during specific and nonspecific facilitation were not explained by different spinal motoneuron excitability, but raise the possibility that supraspinal mechanisms contributed to nonspecific facilitation.

KW - F wave

KW - Facilitation

KW - Motor control

KW - Motor evoked potential

KW - Spinal excitability

KW - Transcranial magnetic stimulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0345643326&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199907)22:7<857::AID-MUS7>3.0.CO;2-B

DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199907)22:7<857::AID-MUS7>3.0.CO;2-B

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 10398202

AN - SCOPUS:0345643326

VL - 22

SP - 857

EP - 863

JO - Muscle & Nerve

JF - Muscle & Nerve

SN - 0148-639X

IS - 7

ER -

ID: 201453916