Sensitivity and resolution improvement for in vivo magnetic resonance current-density imaging of the human brain

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Sensitivity and resolution improvement for in vivo magnetic resonance current-density imaging of the human brain. / Göksu, Cihan; Scheffler, Klaus; Gregersen, Fróði; Eroğlu, Hasan H.; Heule, Rahel; Siebner, Hartwig R.; Hanson, Lars G.; Thielscher, Axel.

In: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Vol. 86, No. 6, 2021, p. 3131-3146.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Göksu, C, Scheffler, K, Gregersen, F, Eroğlu, HH, Heule, R, Siebner, HR, Hanson, LG & Thielscher, A 2021, 'Sensitivity and resolution improvement for in vivo magnetic resonance current-density imaging of the human brain', Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 3131-3146. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28944

APA

Göksu, C., Scheffler, K., Gregersen, F., Eroğlu, H. H., Heule, R., Siebner, H. R., Hanson, L. G., & Thielscher, A. (2021). Sensitivity and resolution improvement for in vivo magnetic resonance current-density imaging of the human brain. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 86(6), 3131-3146. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28944

Vancouver

Göksu C, Scheffler K, Gregersen F, Eroğlu HH, Heule R, Siebner HR et al. Sensitivity and resolution improvement for in vivo magnetic resonance current-density imaging of the human brain. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2021;86(6):3131-3146. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28944

Author

Göksu, Cihan ; Scheffler, Klaus ; Gregersen, Fróði ; Eroğlu, Hasan H. ; Heule, Rahel ; Siebner, Hartwig R. ; Hanson, Lars G. ; Thielscher, Axel. / Sensitivity and resolution improvement for in vivo magnetic resonance current-density imaging of the human brain. In: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2021 ; Vol. 86, No. 6. pp. 3131-3146.

Bibtex

@article{24c8329926b647f28f89b70bb46e7805,
title = "Sensitivity and resolution improvement for in vivo magnetic resonance current-density imaging of the human brain",
abstract = "Purpose: Magnetic resonance current-density imaging (MRCDI) combines MRI with low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (TES; 1-2 mA) to map current flow in the brain. However, usage of MRCDI is still hampered by low measurement sensitivity and image quality. Methods: Recently, a multigradient-echo–based MRCDI approach has been introduced that presently has the best-documented efficiency. This MRCDI approach has now been advanced in three directions and has been validated by phantom and in vivo experiments. First, the importance of optimum spoiling for brain imaging was verified. Second, the sensitivity and spatial resolution were improved by using acquisition weighting. Third, navigators were added as a quality control measure for tracking physiological noise. Combining these advancements, the optimized MRCDI method was tested by using 1 mA TES for two different injection profiles. Results: For a session duration of 4:20 min, the new MRCDI method was able to detect TES-induced magnetic fields at a sensitivity level of 84 picotesla, representing a twofold efficiency increase against our original method. A comparison between measurements and simulations based on personalized head models showed a consistent increase in the coefficient of determination of ΔR2 = 0.12 for the current-induced magnetic fields and ΔR2 = 0.22 for the current flow reconstructions. Interestingly, some of the simulations still clearly deviated from the measurements despite the strongly improved measurement quality. This highlights the utility of MRCDI to improve head models for TES simulations. Conclusion: The achieved sensitivity improvement is an important step from proof-of-concept studies toward a broader application of MRCDI in clinical and basic neuroscience research.",
keywords = "acquisition-weighted in vivo brain imaging, current-induced magnetic field, magnetic resonance current-density imaging, navigators, spoiled multiecho-gradient echo",
author = "Cihan G{\"o}ksu and Klaus Scheffler and Fr{\'o}{\dh}i Gregersen and Eroğlu, {Hasan H.} and Rahel Heule and Siebner, {Hartwig R.} and Hanson, {Lars G.} and Axel Thielscher",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1002/mrm.28944",
language = "English",
volume = "86",
pages = "3131--3146",
journal = "Magnetic Resonance in Medicine",
issn = "0740-3194",
publisher = "JohnWiley & Sons, Inc.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sensitivity and resolution improvement for in vivo magnetic resonance current-density imaging of the human brain

AU - Göksu, Cihan

AU - Scheffler, Klaus

AU - Gregersen, Fróði

AU - Eroğlu, Hasan H.

AU - Heule, Rahel

AU - Siebner, Hartwig R.

AU - Hanson, Lars G.

AU - Thielscher, Axel

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Purpose: Magnetic resonance current-density imaging (MRCDI) combines MRI with low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (TES; 1-2 mA) to map current flow in the brain. However, usage of MRCDI is still hampered by low measurement sensitivity and image quality. Methods: Recently, a multigradient-echo–based MRCDI approach has been introduced that presently has the best-documented efficiency. This MRCDI approach has now been advanced in three directions and has been validated by phantom and in vivo experiments. First, the importance of optimum spoiling for brain imaging was verified. Second, the sensitivity and spatial resolution were improved by using acquisition weighting. Third, navigators were added as a quality control measure for tracking physiological noise. Combining these advancements, the optimized MRCDI method was tested by using 1 mA TES for two different injection profiles. Results: For a session duration of 4:20 min, the new MRCDI method was able to detect TES-induced magnetic fields at a sensitivity level of 84 picotesla, representing a twofold efficiency increase against our original method. A comparison between measurements and simulations based on personalized head models showed a consistent increase in the coefficient of determination of ΔR2 = 0.12 for the current-induced magnetic fields and ΔR2 = 0.22 for the current flow reconstructions. Interestingly, some of the simulations still clearly deviated from the measurements despite the strongly improved measurement quality. This highlights the utility of MRCDI to improve head models for TES simulations. Conclusion: The achieved sensitivity improvement is an important step from proof-of-concept studies toward a broader application of MRCDI in clinical and basic neuroscience research.

AB - Purpose: Magnetic resonance current-density imaging (MRCDI) combines MRI with low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (TES; 1-2 mA) to map current flow in the brain. However, usage of MRCDI is still hampered by low measurement sensitivity and image quality. Methods: Recently, a multigradient-echo–based MRCDI approach has been introduced that presently has the best-documented efficiency. This MRCDI approach has now been advanced in three directions and has been validated by phantom and in vivo experiments. First, the importance of optimum spoiling for brain imaging was verified. Second, the sensitivity and spatial resolution were improved by using acquisition weighting. Third, navigators were added as a quality control measure for tracking physiological noise. Combining these advancements, the optimized MRCDI method was tested by using 1 mA TES for two different injection profiles. Results: For a session duration of 4:20 min, the new MRCDI method was able to detect TES-induced magnetic fields at a sensitivity level of 84 picotesla, representing a twofold efficiency increase against our original method. A comparison between measurements and simulations based on personalized head models showed a consistent increase in the coefficient of determination of ΔR2 = 0.12 for the current-induced magnetic fields and ΔR2 = 0.22 for the current flow reconstructions. Interestingly, some of the simulations still clearly deviated from the measurements despite the strongly improved measurement quality. This highlights the utility of MRCDI to improve head models for TES simulations. Conclusion: The achieved sensitivity improvement is an important step from proof-of-concept studies toward a broader application of MRCDI in clinical and basic neuroscience research.

KW - acquisition-weighted in vivo brain imaging

KW - current-induced magnetic field

KW - magnetic resonance current-density imaging

KW - navigators

KW - spoiled multiecho-gradient echo

U2 - 10.1002/mrm.28944

DO - 10.1002/mrm.28944

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34337785

AN - SCOPUS:85111654063

VL - 86

SP - 3131

EP - 3146

JO - Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

JF - Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

SN - 0740-3194

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 276388983