The Impact of Preprocessing Pipeline Choice in Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of PET Data

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

Standard

The Impact of Preprocessing Pipeline Choice in Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of PET Data. / Nørgaard, Martin; Greve, Douglas N.; Svarer, Claus; Strother, Stephen C.; Knudsen, Gitte M.; Ganz, Melanie.

2018 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging, PRNI 2018. IEEE, 2018. 8423962.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Nørgaard, M, Greve, DN, Svarer, C, Strother, SC, Knudsen, GM & Ganz, M 2018, The Impact of Preprocessing Pipeline Choice in Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of PET Data. in 2018 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging, PRNI 2018., 8423962, IEEE, 2018 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging, PRNI 2018, Singapore, Singapore, 12/06/2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/PRNI.2018.8423962

APA

Nørgaard, M., Greve, D. N., Svarer, C., Strother, S. C., Knudsen, G. M., & Ganz, M. (2018). The Impact of Preprocessing Pipeline Choice in Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of PET Data. In 2018 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging, PRNI 2018 [8423962] IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/PRNI.2018.8423962

Vancouver

Nørgaard M, Greve DN, Svarer C, Strother SC, Knudsen GM, Ganz M. The Impact of Preprocessing Pipeline Choice in Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of PET Data. In 2018 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging, PRNI 2018. IEEE. 2018. 8423962 https://doi.org/10.1109/PRNI.2018.8423962

Author

Nørgaard, Martin ; Greve, Douglas N. ; Svarer, Claus ; Strother, Stephen C. ; Knudsen, Gitte M. ; Ganz, Melanie. / The Impact of Preprocessing Pipeline Choice in Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of PET Data. 2018 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging, PRNI 2018. IEEE, 2018.

Bibtex

@inproceedings{4048db38adb64c218911db54448a69c1,
title = "The Impact of Preprocessing Pipeline Choice in Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of PET Data",
abstract = "It has long been recognized that the data preprocessing chain is a critical part of a neuroimaging experiment. In this work we evaluate the impact of preprocessing choices in univariate and multivariate analyses of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) data. Thirty healthy participants were scanned twice in a High-Resolution Research Tomography PET scanner with the serotonin transporter (5-HTT) radioligand [11 C]DASB. Binding potentials (BPND) from 14 brain regions are quantified with 384 different preprocessing choices. A univariate paired t-Test is applied to each region and for each preprocessing choice, and corrected for multiple comparisons using FDR within each pipeline. Additionally, a multivariate Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) model is used to discriminate test and retest BPND, and the model performance is evaluated using a repeated cross-validation framework with permutations. The univariate analysis revealed several significant differences in 5-HTT BPND across brain regions, depending on the preprocessing choice. The classification accuracy of the multivariate LDA model varied from 37% to 70% depending on the choice of preprocessing, and could reasonably be modeled with a normal distribution centered at 51% accuracy. In spite of correcting for multiple comparisons, the univariate model with varying preprocessing choices is more likely to generate false-positive results compared to a simple multivariate analysis model evaluated with cross-validation and permutations.",
author = "Martin N{\o}rgaard and Greve, {Douglas N.} and Claus Svarer and Strother, {Stephen C.} and Knudsen, {Gitte M.} and Melanie Ganz",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1109/PRNI.2018.8423962",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781538668597",
booktitle = "2018 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging, PRNI 2018",
publisher = "IEEE",
note = "2018 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging, PRNI 2018 ; Conference date: 12-06-2018 Through 14-06-2018",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - The Impact of Preprocessing Pipeline Choice in Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of PET Data

AU - Nørgaard, Martin

AU - Greve, Douglas N.

AU - Svarer, Claus

AU - Strother, Stephen C.

AU - Knudsen, Gitte M.

AU - Ganz, Melanie

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - It has long been recognized that the data preprocessing chain is a critical part of a neuroimaging experiment. In this work we evaluate the impact of preprocessing choices in univariate and multivariate analyses of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) data. Thirty healthy participants were scanned twice in a High-Resolution Research Tomography PET scanner with the serotonin transporter (5-HTT) radioligand [11 C]DASB. Binding potentials (BPND) from 14 brain regions are quantified with 384 different preprocessing choices. A univariate paired t-Test is applied to each region and for each preprocessing choice, and corrected for multiple comparisons using FDR within each pipeline. Additionally, a multivariate Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) model is used to discriminate test and retest BPND, and the model performance is evaluated using a repeated cross-validation framework with permutations. The univariate analysis revealed several significant differences in 5-HTT BPND across brain regions, depending on the preprocessing choice. The classification accuracy of the multivariate LDA model varied from 37% to 70% depending on the choice of preprocessing, and could reasonably be modeled with a normal distribution centered at 51% accuracy. In spite of correcting for multiple comparisons, the univariate model with varying preprocessing choices is more likely to generate false-positive results compared to a simple multivariate analysis model evaluated with cross-validation and permutations.

AB - It has long been recognized that the data preprocessing chain is a critical part of a neuroimaging experiment. In this work we evaluate the impact of preprocessing choices in univariate and multivariate analyses of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) data. Thirty healthy participants were scanned twice in a High-Resolution Research Tomography PET scanner with the serotonin transporter (5-HTT) radioligand [11 C]DASB. Binding potentials (BPND) from 14 brain regions are quantified with 384 different preprocessing choices. A univariate paired t-Test is applied to each region and for each preprocessing choice, and corrected for multiple comparisons using FDR within each pipeline. Additionally, a multivariate Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) model is used to discriminate test and retest BPND, and the model performance is evaluated using a repeated cross-validation framework with permutations. The univariate analysis revealed several significant differences in 5-HTT BPND across brain regions, depending on the preprocessing choice. The classification accuracy of the multivariate LDA model varied from 37% to 70% depending on the choice of preprocessing, and could reasonably be modeled with a normal distribution centered at 51% accuracy. In spite of correcting for multiple comparisons, the univariate model with varying preprocessing choices is more likely to generate false-positive results compared to a simple multivariate analysis model evaluated with cross-validation and permutations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051565165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/PRNI.2018.8423962

DO - 10.1109/PRNI.2018.8423962

M3 - Article in proceedings

AN - SCOPUS:85051565165

SN - 9781538668597

BT - 2018 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging, PRNI 2018

PB - IEEE

T2 - 2018 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging, PRNI 2018

Y2 - 12 June 2018 through 14 June 2018

ER -

ID: 203671902