Using MR elastography to assess portal hypertension and response to beta-blockers in patients with cirrhosis
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Using MR elastography to assess portal hypertension and response to beta-blockers in patients with cirrhosis. / Danielsen, Karen Vagner; Hove, Jens Dahlgaard; Nabilou, Puria; Yin, Meng; Chen, Jun; Zhao, Mirabella; Kallemose, Thomas; Teisner, Ane Sogaard; Siebner, Hartwig Roman; Ehman, Richard L.; Møller, Soren; Bendtsen, Flemming.
In: Liver International, Vol. 41, No. 9, 2021, p. 2149-2158.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Using MR elastography to assess portal hypertension and response to beta-blockers in patients with cirrhosis
AU - Danielsen, Karen Vagner
AU - Hove, Jens Dahlgaard
AU - Nabilou, Puria
AU - Yin, Meng
AU - Chen, Jun
AU - Zhao, Mirabella
AU - Kallemose, Thomas
AU - Teisner, Ane Sogaard
AU - Siebner, Hartwig Roman
AU - Ehman, Richard L.
AU - Møller, Soren
AU - Bendtsen, Flemming
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - BackgroundMR elastography can determine organ-related stiffness, which reflects the degree of fibrosis. Liver stiffness increases in cirrhosis, and stiffness increases further post-prandially due to increased portal blood in-flow. Non-selective beta-blockers (NSBB) reduce the portal venous inflow, but their effect on liver and spleen stiffness are disputed.AimsTo assess whether MR elastography of the liver or spleen reflects the severity of cirrhosis, whether treatment with NSBB changes liver and spleen stiffness and whether changes in stiffness can predict the effect of NSBB on portal pressure.MethodsFifty-two patients with cirrhosis underwent liver vein catheterization and two-dimensional (2D) MR elastography on separate days. Thirty-six of the patients had a hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) of ≥12 mmHg and were tested prior to, and after, intravenous infusion of NSBB using HVPG measurement and MR elastography.ResultsHVPG showed a strong, positive, linear relationship with liver stiffness (r2 = 0.92; P < .001) and spleen stiffness (r2 = 0.94; P < .001). The cut-off points for identifying patients with a HVPG ≥ 12 mmHg were 7.7 kPa for liver stiffness (sensitivity 0.78, specificity 0.64) and 10.5 kPa for spleen stiffness (sensitivity 0.8, specificity 0.79).Intravenous administration of NSBB significantly decreased spleen stiffness by 6.9% (CI: 3.5-10.4, P < .001), but NSBB had no consistent effect on liver stiffness. However, changes in spleen stiffness were not related to the HVPG response (P = .75).ConclusionsTwo-dimensional MR elastographic estimation of liver or spleen stiffness reflects the degree of portal hypertension in patients with liver cirrhosis, but changes in stiffness after NSBB do not predict the effect on HVPG.
AB - BackgroundMR elastography can determine organ-related stiffness, which reflects the degree of fibrosis. Liver stiffness increases in cirrhosis, and stiffness increases further post-prandially due to increased portal blood in-flow. Non-selective beta-blockers (NSBB) reduce the portal venous inflow, but their effect on liver and spleen stiffness are disputed.AimsTo assess whether MR elastography of the liver or spleen reflects the severity of cirrhosis, whether treatment with NSBB changes liver and spleen stiffness and whether changes in stiffness can predict the effect of NSBB on portal pressure.MethodsFifty-two patients with cirrhosis underwent liver vein catheterization and two-dimensional (2D) MR elastography on separate days. Thirty-six of the patients had a hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) of ≥12 mmHg and were tested prior to, and after, intravenous infusion of NSBB using HVPG measurement and MR elastography.ResultsHVPG showed a strong, positive, linear relationship with liver stiffness (r2 = 0.92; P < .001) and spleen stiffness (r2 = 0.94; P < .001). The cut-off points for identifying patients with a HVPG ≥ 12 mmHg were 7.7 kPa for liver stiffness (sensitivity 0.78, specificity 0.64) and 10.5 kPa for spleen stiffness (sensitivity 0.8, specificity 0.79).Intravenous administration of NSBB significantly decreased spleen stiffness by 6.9% (CI: 3.5-10.4, P < .001), but NSBB had no consistent effect on liver stiffness. However, changes in spleen stiffness were not related to the HVPG response (P = .75).ConclusionsTwo-dimensional MR elastographic estimation of liver or spleen stiffness reflects the degree of portal hypertension in patients with liver cirrhosis, but changes in stiffness after NSBB do not predict the effect on HVPG.
KW - beta-blockers
KW - imaging
KW - liver cirrhosis
KW - magnetic resonance elastography
KW - portal hypertension
U2 - 10.1111/liv.14981
DO - 10.1111/liv.14981
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 34060714
VL - 41
SP - 2149
EP - 2158
JO - Liver International
JF - Liver International
SN - 1478-3223
IS - 9
ER -
ID: 273068054