Volumetric measurements of weak current–induced magnetic fields in the human brain at high resolution

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Volumetric measurements of weak current–induced magnetic fields in the human brain at high resolution. / Göksu, Cihan; Gregersen, Fróði; Scheffler, Klaus; Eroğlu, Hasan H.; Heule, Rahel; Siebner, Hartwig R.; Hanson, Lars G.; Thielscher, Axel.

In: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Vol. 90, No. 5, 2023, p. 1874-1888.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Göksu, C, Gregersen, F, Scheffler, K, Eroğlu, HH, Heule, R, Siebner, HR, Hanson, LG & Thielscher, A 2023, 'Volumetric measurements of weak current–induced magnetic fields in the human brain at high resolution', Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 1874-1888. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29780

APA

Göksu, C., Gregersen, F., Scheffler, K., Eroğlu, H. H., Heule, R., Siebner, H. R., Hanson, L. G., & Thielscher, A. (2023). Volumetric measurements of weak current–induced magnetic fields in the human brain at high resolution. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 90(5), 1874-1888. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29780

Vancouver

Göksu C, Gregersen F, Scheffler K, Eroğlu HH, Heule R, Siebner HR et al. Volumetric measurements of weak current–induced magnetic fields in the human brain at high resolution. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2023;90(5):1874-1888. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29780

Author

Göksu, Cihan ; Gregersen, Fróði ; Scheffler, Klaus ; Eroğlu, Hasan H. ; Heule, Rahel ; Siebner, Hartwig R. ; Hanson, Lars G. ; Thielscher, Axel. / Volumetric measurements of weak current–induced magnetic fields in the human brain at high resolution. In: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2023 ; Vol. 90, No. 5. pp. 1874-1888.

Bibtex

@article{c11513b574d04a38b2bf087e9081db96,
title = "Volumetric measurements of weak current–induced magnetic fields in the human brain at high resolution",
abstract = "Purpose: Clinical use of transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) requires accurate knowledge of the injected current distribution in the brain. MR current density imaging (MRCDI) uses measurements of the TES-induced magnetic fields to provide this information. However, sufficient sensitivity and image quality in humans in vivo has only been documented for single-slice imaging. Methods: A recently developed, optimally spoiled, acquisition-weighted, gradient echo–based 2D-MRCDI method has now been advanced for volume coverage with densely or sparsely distributed slices: The 3D rectilinear sampling (3D-DENSE) and simultaneous multislice acquisition (SMS-SPARSE) were optimized and verified by cable-loop experiments and tested with 1-mA TES experiments for two common electrode montages. Results: Comparisons between the volumetric methods against the 2D-MRCDI showed that relatively long acquisition times of 3D-DENSE using a single slab with six slices hindered the expected sensitivity improvement in the current-induced field measurements but improved sensitivity by 61% in the Laplacian of the field, on which some MRCDI reconstruction methods rely. Also, SMS-SPARSE acquisition of three slices, with a factor 2 CAIPIRINHA (controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration) acceleration, performed best against the 2D-MRCDI with sensitivity improvements for the (Figure presented.) and Laplacian noise floors of 56% and 78% (baseline without current flow) as well as 43% and 55% (current injection into head). SMS-SPARSE reached a sensitivity of 67 pT for three distant slices at 2 × 2 × 3 mm3 resolution in 10 min of total scan time, and consistently improved image quality. Conclusion: Volumetric MRCDI measurements with high sensitivity and image quality are well suited to characterize the TES field distribution in the human brain.",
keywords = "3D volume acquisition, current-induced magnetic field, magnetic resonance current density imaging, simultaneous multislice acquisition, transcranial electrical stimulation",
author = "Cihan G{\"o}ksu and Fr{\'o}{\dh}i Gregersen and Klaus Scheffler and Eroğlu, {Hasan H.} and Rahel Heule and Siebner, {Hartwig R.} and Hanson, {Lars G.} and Axel Thielscher",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1002/mrm.29780",
language = "English",
volume = "90",
pages = "1874--1888",
journal = "Magnetic Resonance in Medicine",
issn = "0740-3194",
publisher = "JohnWiley & Sons, Inc.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Volumetric measurements of weak current–induced magnetic fields in the human brain at high resolution

AU - Göksu, Cihan

AU - Gregersen, Fróði

AU - Scheffler, Klaus

AU - Eroğlu, Hasan H.

AU - Heule, Rahel

AU - Siebner, Hartwig R.

AU - Hanson, Lars G.

AU - Thielscher, Axel

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Purpose: Clinical use of transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) requires accurate knowledge of the injected current distribution in the brain. MR current density imaging (MRCDI) uses measurements of the TES-induced magnetic fields to provide this information. However, sufficient sensitivity and image quality in humans in vivo has only been documented for single-slice imaging. Methods: A recently developed, optimally spoiled, acquisition-weighted, gradient echo–based 2D-MRCDI method has now been advanced for volume coverage with densely or sparsely distributed slices: The 3D rectilinear sampling (3D-DENSE) and simultaneous multislice acquisition (SMS-SPARSE) were optimized and verified by cable-loop experiments and tested with 1-mA TES experiments for two common electrode montages. Results: Comparisons between the volumetric methods against the 2D-MRCDI showed that relatively long acquisition times of 3D-DENSE using a single slab with six slices hindered the expected sensitivity improvement in the current-induced field measurements but improved sensitivity by 61% in the Laplacian of the field, on which some MRCDI reconstruction methods rely. Also, SMS-SPARSE acquisition of three slices, with a factor 2 CAIPIRINHA (controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration) acceleration, performed best against the 2D-MRCDI with sensitivity improvements for the (Figure presented.) and Laplacian noise floors of 56% and 78% (baseline without current flow) as well as 43% and 55% (current injection into head). SMS-SPARSE reached a sensitivity of 67 pT for three distant slices at 2 × 2 × 3 mm3 resolution in 10 min of total scan time, and consistently improved image quality. Conclusion: Volumetric MRCDI measurements with high sensitivity and image quality are well suited to characterize the TES field distribution in the human brain.

AB - Purpose: Clinical use of transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) requires accurate knowledge of the injected current distribution in the brain. MR current density imaging (MRCDI) uses measurements of the TES-induced magnetic fields to provide this information. However, sufficient sensitivity and image quality in humans in vivo has only been documented for single-slice imaging. Methods: A recently developed, optimally spoiled, acquisition-weighted, gradient echo–based 2D-MRCDI method has now been advanced for volume coverage with densely or sparsely distributed slices: The 3D rectilinear sampling (3D-DENSE) and simultaneous multislice acquisition (SMS-SPARSE) were optimized and verified by cable-loop experiments and tested with 1-mA TES experiments for two common electrode montages. Results: Comparisons between the volumetric methods against the 2D-MRCDI showed that relatively long acquisition times of 3D-DENSE using a single slab with six slices hindered the expected sensitivity improvement in the current-induced field measurements but improved sensitivity by 61% in the Laplacian of the field, on which some MRCDI reconstruction methods rely. Also, SMS-SPARSE acquisition of three slices, with a factor 2 CAIPIRINHA (controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration) acceleration, performed best against the 2D-MRCDI with sensitivity improvements for the (Figure presented.) and Laplacian noise floors of 56% and 78% (baseline without current flow) as well as 43% and 55% (current injection into head). SMS-SPARSE reached a sensitivity of 67 pT for three distant slices at 2 × 2 × 3 mm3 resolution in 10 min of total scan time, and consistently improved image quality. Conclusion: Volumetric MRCDI measurements with high sensitivity and image quality are well suited to characterize the TES field distribution in the human brain.

KW - 3D volume acquisition

KW - current-induced magnetic field

KW - magnetic resonance current density imaging

KW - simultaneous multislice acquisition

KW - transcranial electrical stimulation

U2 - 10.1002/mrm.29780

DO - 10.1002/mrm.29780

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 37392412

AN - SCOPUS:85164165357

VL - 90

SP - 1874

EP - 1888

JO - Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

JF - Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

SN - 0740-3194

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 366383520