Volumetric measurements of weak current–induced magnetic fields in the human brain at high resolution
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Volumetric measurements of weak current–induced magnetic fields in the human brain at high resolution. / Göksu, Cihan; Gregersen, Fróði; Scheffler, Klaus; Eroğlu, Hasan H.; Heule, Rahel; Siebner, Hartwig R.; Hanson, Lars G.; Thielscher, Axel.
In: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Vol. 90, No. 5, 2023, p. 1874-1888.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Volumetric measurements of weak current–induced magnetic fields in the human brain at high resolution
AU - Göksu, Cihan
AU - Gregersen, Fróði
AU - Scheffler, Klaus
AU - Eroğlu, Hasan H.
AU - Heule, Rahel
AU - Siebner, Hartwig R.
AU - Hanson, Lars G.
AU - Thielscher, Axel
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Purpose: Clinical use of transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) requires accurate knowledge of the injected current distribution in the brain. MR current density imaging (MRCDI) uses measurements of the TES-induced magnetic fields to provide this information. However, sufficient sensitivity and image quality in humans in vivo has only been documented for single-slice imaging. Methods: A recently developed, optimally spoiled, acquisition-weighted, gradient echo–based 2D-MRCDI method has now been advanced for volume coverage with densely or sparsely distributed slices: The 3D rectilinear sampling (3D-DENSE) and simultaneous multislice acquisition (SMS-SPARSE) were optimized and verified by cable-loop experiments and tested with 1-mA TES experiments for two common electrode montages. Results: Comparisons between the volumetric methods against the 2D-MRCDI showed that relatively long acquisition times of 3D-DENSE using a single slab with six slices hindered the expected sensitivity improvement in the current-induced field measurements but improved sensitivity by 61% in the Laplacian of the field, on which some MRCDI reconstruction methods rely. Also, SMS-SPARSE acquisition of three slices, with a factor 2 CAIPIRINHA (controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration) acceleration, performed best against the 2D-MRCDI with sensitivity improvements for the (Figure presented.) and Laplacian noise floors of 56% and 78% (baseline without current flow) as well as 43% and 55% (current injection into head). SMS-SPARSE reached a sensitivity of 67 pT for three distant slices at 2 × 2 × 3 mm3 resolution in 10 min of total scan time, and consistently improved image quality. Conclusion: Volumetric MRCDI measurements with high sensitivity and image quality are well suited to characterize the TES field distribution in the human brain.
AB - Purpose: Clinical use of transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) requires accurate knowledge of the injected current distribution in the brain. MR current density imaging (MRCDI) uses measurements of the TES-induced magnetic fields to provide this information. However, sufficient sensitivity and image quality in humans in vivo has only been documented for single-slice imaging. Methods: A recently developed, optimally spoiled, acquisition-weighted, gradient echo–based 2D-MRCDI method has now been advanced for volume coverage with densely or sparsely distributed slices: The 3D rectilinear sampling (3D-DENSE) and simultaneous multislice acquisition (SMS-SPARSE) were optimized and verified by cable-loop experiments and tested with 1-mA TES experiments for two common electrode montages. Results: Comparisons between the volumetric methods against the 2D-MRCDI showed that relatively long acquisition times of 3D-DENSE using a single slab with six slices hindered the expected sensitivity improvement in the current-induced field measurements but improved sensitivity by 61% in the Laplacian of the field, on which some MRCDI reconstruction methods rely. Also, SMS-SPARSE acquisition of three slices, with a factor 2 CAIPIRINHA (controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration) acceleration, performed best against the 2D-MRCDI with sensitivity improvements for the (Figure presented.) and Laplacian noise floors of 56% and 78% (baseline without current flow) as well as 43% and 55% (current injection into head). SMS-SPARSE reached a sensitivity of 67 pT for three distant slices at 2 × 2 × 3 mm3 resolution in 10 min of total scan time, and consistently improved image quality. Conclusion: Volumetric MRCDI measurements with high sensitivity and image quality are well suited to characterize the TES field distribution in the human brain.
KW - 3D volume acquisition
KW - current-induced magnetic field
KW - magnetic resonance current density imaging
KW - simultaneous multislice acquisition
KW - transcranial electrical stimulation
U2 - 10.1002/mrm.29780
DO - 10.1002/mrm.29780
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 37392412
AN - SCOPUS:85164165357
VL - 90
SP - 1874
EP - 1888
JO - Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
JF - Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
SN - 0740-3194
IS - 5
ER -
ID: 366383520