Comparative efficacy of medical treatments for vernal keratoconjunctivitis in children and young adults: a systematic review with network meta-analyses

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Standard

Comparative efficacy of medical treatments for vernal keratoconjunctivitis in children and young adults : a systematic review with network meta-analyses. / Rasmussen, Marie Louise Roed; Schou, Marianne Guldager; Bach-Holm, Daniella; Heegaard, Steffen; Jørgensen, Christel Asserina Bjerregaard; Kessel, Line; Wiencke, Anne Katrine; Subhi, Yousif.

In: Acta Ophthalmologica, Vol. 100, No. 1, 2022, p. 35-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Rasmussen, MLR, Schou, MG, Bach-Holm, D, Heegaard, S, Jørgensen, CAB, Kessel, L, Wiencke, AK & Subhi, Y 2022, 'Comparative efficacy of medical treatments for vernal keratoconjunctivitis in children and young adults: a systematic review with network meta-analyses', Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 35-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.14858

APA

Rasmussen, M. L. R., Schou, M. G., Bach-Holm, D., Heegaard, S., Jørgensen, C. A. B., Kessel, L., Wiencke, A. K., & Subhi, Y. (2022). Comparative efficacy of medical treatments for vernal keratoconjunctivitis in children and young adults: a systematic review with network meta-analyses. Acta Ophthalmologica, 100(1), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.14858

Vancouver

Rasmussen MLR, Schou MG, Bach-Holm D, Heegaard S, Jørgensen CAB, Kessel L et al. Comparative efficacy of medical treatments for vernal keratoconjunctivitis in children and young adults: a systematic review with network meta-analyses. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2022;100(1):35-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.14858

Author

Rasmussen, Marie Louise Roed ; Schou, Marianne Guldager ; Bach-Holm, Daniella ; Heegaard, Steffen ; Jørgensen, Christel Asserina Bjerregaard ; Kessel, Line ; Wiencke, Anne Katrine ; Subhi, Yousif. / Comparative efficacy of medical treatments for vernal keratoconjunctivitis in children and young adults : a systematic review with network meta-analyses. In: Acta Ophthalmologica. 2022 ; Vol. 100, No. 1. pp. 35-44.

Bibtex

@article{7fc37cd3a81a45ba9f8c0a9e889ec3fd,
title = "Comparative efficacy of medical treatments for vernal keratoconjunctivitis in children and young adults: a systematic review with network meta-analyses",
abstract = "Purpose: To systematically review the literature on the treatment of vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) in children and young adults and conduct comparative efficacy analysis on clinical signs and symptoms using network meta-analyses. Methods: We systematically searched the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central and Web of Science on 21 October 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCT). Studies considered had patients with VKC < 20 years of age randomized into either intervention (any medical intervention) or comparator (active treatment, placebo treatment or non-treatment control), where pre-defined outcomes (data from ≥2 weeks and as close as possible to 2 months) of symptoms (itching, tearing, photophobia and foreign body sensation) and signs (hyperaemia, punctate keratitis, Horner-Trantas dots and macropapillae) were reported. Risk of bias within studies was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Comparisons were made using network meta-analyses. Results: We identified 39 studies with data on 2046 individuals. Twenty-three studies were eligible for quantitative analyses. None were systemic therapy. Temporal trend analysis showed that an initial focus on topical mast cell stabilizers turned to a focus on calcineurin inhibitors and a more diverse variety of pharmacological strategies. Studies varied in population, treatment duration and quality. The quantitative analysis revealed that efficacy of different therapies differed substantially across important clinical signs and symptoms, but there was a general trend of superior efficacy when using topical corticosteroids with stronger efficacy of the more potent corticosteroids. Conclusion: We provide an overview of RCTs comparing the efficacy of treatments for VKC in children and young adults, which we find differs across symptoms and signs. Overall, we saw a general trend of superior efficacy with topical corticosteroids. However, our findings highlight the need for better studies, consensus on core outcomes and potential for individualized therapy.",
keywords = "network meta-analysis, systematic review, treatment efficacy, vernal keratoconjunctivitis",
author = "Rasmussen, {Marie Louise Roed} and Schou, {Marianne Guldager} and Daniella Bach-Holm and Steffen Heegaard and J{\o}rgensen, {Christel Asserina Bjerregaard} and Line Kessel and Wiencke, {Anne Katrine} and Yousif Subhi",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1111/aos.14858",
language = "English",
volume = "100",
pages = "35--44",
journal = "Acta Ophthalmologica",
issn = "1755-375X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative efficacy of medical treatments for vernal keratoconjunctivitis in children and young adults

T2 - a systematic review with network meta-analyses

AU - Rasmussen, Marie Louise Roed

AU - Schou, Marianne Guldager

AU - Bach-Holm, Daniella

AU - Heegaard, Steffen

AU - Jørgensen, Christel Asserina Bjerregaard

AU - Kessel, Line

AU - Wiencke, Anne Katrine

AU - Subhi, Yousif

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Purpose: To systematically review the literature on the treatment of vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) in children and young adults and conduct comparative efficacy analysis on clinical signs and symptoms using network meta-analyses. Methods: We systematically searched the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central and Web of Science on 21 October 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCT). Studies considered had patients with VKC < 20 years of age randomized into either intervention (any medical intervention) or comparator (active treatment, placebo treatment or non-treatment control), where pre-defined outcomes (data from ≥2 weeks and as close as possible to 2 months) of symptoms (itching, tearing, photophobia and foreign body sensation) and signs (hyperaemia, punctate keratitis, Horner-Trantas dots and macropapillae) were reported. Risk of bias within studies was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Comparisons were made using network meta-analyses. Results: We identified 39 studies with data on 2046 individuals. Twenty-three studies were eligible for quantitative analyses. None were systemic therapy. Temporal trend analysis showed that an initial focus on topical mast cell stabilizers turned to a focus on calcineurin inhibitors and a more diverse variety of pharmacological strategies. Studies varied in population, treatment duration and quality. The quantitative analysis revealed that efficacy of different therapies differed substantially across important clinical signs and symptoms, but there was a general trend of superior efficacy when using topical corticosteroids with stronger efficacy of the more potent corticosteroids. Conclusion: We provide an overview of RCTs comparing the efficacy of treatments for VKC in children and young adults, which we find differs across symptoms and signs. Overall, we saw a general trend of superior efficacy with topical corticosteroids. However, our findings highlight the need for better studies, consensus on core outcomes and potential for individualized therapy.

AB - Purpose: To systematically review the literature on the treatment of vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) in children and young adults and conduct comparative efficacy analysis on clinical signs and symptoms using network meta-analyses. Methods: We systematically searched the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central and Web of Science on 21 October 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCT). Studies considered had patients with VKC < 20 years of age randomized into either intervention (any medical intervention) or comparator (active treatment, placebo treatment or non-treatment control), where pre-defined outcomes (data from ≥2 weeks and as close as possible to 2 months) of symptoms (itching, tearing, photophobia and foreign body sensation) and signs (hyperaemia, punctate keratitis, Horner-Trantas dots and macropapillae) were reported. Risk of bias within studies was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Comparisons were made using network meta-analyses. Results: We identified 39 studies with data on 2046 individuals. Twenty-three studies were eligible for quantitative analyses. None were systemic therapy. Temporal trend analysis showed that an initial focus on topical mast cell stabilizers turned to a focus on calcineurin inhibitors and a more diverse variety of pharmacological strategies. Studies varied in population, treatment duration and quality. The quantitative analysis revealed that efficacy of different therapies differed substantially across important clinical signs and symptoms, but there was a general trend of superior efficacy when using topical corticosteroids with stronger efficacy of the more potent corticosteroids. Conclusion: We provide an overview of RCTs comparing the efficacy of treatments for VKC in children and young adults, which we find differs across symptoms and signs. Overall, we saw a general trend of superior efficacy with topical corticosteroids. However, our findings highlight the need for better studies, consensus on core outcomes and potential for individualized therapy.

KW - network meta-analysis

KW - systematic review

KW - treatment efficacy

KW - vernal keratoconjunctivitis

U2 - 10.1111/aos.14858

DO - 10.1111/aos.14858

M3 - Review

C2 - 33779061

AN - SCOPUS:85103160407

VL - 100

SP - 35

EP - 44

JO - Acta Ophthalmologica

JF - Acta Ophthalmologica

SN - 1755-375X

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 259621433