Inflammation after Voretigene Neparvovec Administration in Patients with RPE65-Related Retinal Dystrophy

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Inflammation after Voretigene Neparvovec Administration in Patients with RPE65-Related Retinal Dystrophy. / Kessel, Line; Christensen, Ulrik Correll; Klemp, Kristian.

In: Ophthalmology, Vol. 129, No. 11, 2022, p. 1287-1293.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Kessel, L, Christensen, UC & Klemp, K 2022, 'Inflammation after Voretigene Neparvovec Administration in Patients with RPE65-Related Retinal Dystrophy', Ophthalmology, vol. 129, no. 11, pp. 1287-1293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.06.018

APA

Kessel, L., Christensen, U. C., & Klemp, K. (2022). Inflammation after Voretigene Neparvovec Administration in Patients with RPE65-Related Retinal Dystrophy. Ophthalmology, 129(11), 1287-1293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.06.018

Vancouver

Kessel L, Christensen UC, Klemp K. Inflammation after Voretigene Neparvovec Administration in Patients with RPE65-Related Retinal Dystrophy. Ophthalmology. 2022;129(11):1287-1293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.06.018

Author

Kessel, Line ; Christensen, Ulrik Correll ; Klemp, Kristian. / Inflammation after Voretigene Neparvovec Administration in Patients with RPE65-Related Retinal Dystrophy. In: Ophthalmology. 2022 ; Vol. 129, No. 11. pp. 1287-1293.

Bibtex

@article{da72f5e70c6a4cba82d8a533787aefad,
title = "Inflammation after Voretigene Neparvovec Administration in Patients with RPE65-Related Retinal Dystrophy",
abstract = "Purpose: To report on the prevalence of intraocular inflammation after subretinal voretigene neparvovec (VN) administration. Design: Retrospective review of medical files. Participants: All patients receiving VN in Denmark. Methods: Twelve patients received VN gene therapy as standard of care for biallelic RPE65-related retinal disease. Bilateral treatment was performed in 11 patients and unilateral treatment in 1 patient. Patients were followed clinically before and after VN administration using functional measurements (visual acuity, full-field scotopic threshold test, visual fields) and structural evaluations (fundus imaging [color and autofluorescence], OCT, slit-lamp). Main Outcome Measures: Signs of intraocular inflammation, including vitritis and outer retinal infiltrates. Results: Vitritis was observed in 9 of 23 eyes receiving VN. The median time to resolution of vitritis from the time of treatment was 89 days. Four eyes also presented with outer retinal infiltrates at the time of vitritis. Inflammation subsided on immunosuppressant therapy. The presence of inflammation did not adversely affect visual outcome after VN therapy. In 1 eye, outer retinal infiltrates were demonstrated to precede later development of atrophy. Conclusions: Patients undergoing subretinal gene therapy need to be closely monitored for signs of inflammation. Although we did not observe a detrimental effect on visual function in eyes with inflammation, it seems wise to treat it appropriately because it may lead to atrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium and outer retina. Also, it seems advisable to reduce the inflammatory load, such as using a surgical technique that minimizes residual viral vectors in the vitreous body.",
keywords = "Gene therapy, Inherited retinal dystrophy, RPE65, Voretigene neparvovec",
author = "Line Kessel and Christensen, {Ulrik Correll} and Kristian Klemp",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 American Academy of Ophthalmology",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.06.018",
language = "English",
volume = "129",
pages = "1287--1293",
journal = "Ophthalmology",
issn = "0161-6420",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inflammation after Voretigene Neparvovec Administration in Patients with RPE65-Related Retinal Dystrophy

AU - Kessel, Line

AU - Christensen, Ulrik Correll

AU - Klemp, Kristian

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 American Academy of Ophthalmology

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Purpose: To report on the prevalence of intraocular inflammation after subretinal voretigene neparvovec (VN) administration. Design: Retrospective review of medical files. Participants: All patients receiving VN in Denmark. Methods: Twelve patients received VN gene therapy as standard of care for biallelic RPE65-related retinal disease. Bilateral treatment was performed in 11 patients and unilateral treatment in 1 patient. Patients were followed clinically before and after VN administration using functional measurements (visual acuity, full-field scotopic threshold test, visual fields) and structural evaluations (fundus imaging [color and autofluorescence], OCT, slit-lamp). Main Outcome Measures: Signs of intraocular inflammation, including vitritis and outer retinal infiltrates. Results: Vitritis was observed in 9 of 23 eyes receiving VN. The median time to resolution of vitritis from the time of treatment was 89 days. Four eyes also presented with outer retinal infiltrates at the time of vitritis. Inflammation subsided on immunosuppressant therapy. The presence of inflammation did not adversely affect visual outcome after VN therapy. In 1 eye, outer retinal infiltrates were demonstrated to precede later development of atrophy. Conclusions: Patients undergoing subretinal gene therapy need to be closely monitored for signs of inflammation. Although we did not observe a detrimental effect on visual function in eyes with inflammation, it seems wise to treat it appropriately because it may lead to atrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium and outer retina. Also, it seems advisable to reduce the inflammatory load, such as using a surgical technique that minimizes residual viral vectors in the vitreous body.

AB - Purpose: To report on the prevalence of intraocular inflammation after subretinal voretigene neparvovec (VN) administration. Design: Retrospective review of medical files. Participants: All patients receiving VN in Denmark. Methods: Twelve patients received VN gene therapy as standard of care for biallelic RPE65-related retinal disease. Bilateral treatment was performed in 11 patients and unilateral treatment in 1 patient. Patients were followed clinically before and after VN administration using functional measurements (visual acuity, full-field scotopic threshold test, visual fields) and structural evaluations (fundus imaging [color and autofluorescence], OCT, slit-lamp). Main Outcome Measures: Signs of intraocular inflammation, including vitritis and outer retinal infiltrates. Results: Vitritis was observed in 9 of 23 eyes receiving VN. The median time to resolution of vitritis from the time of treatment was 89 days. Four eyes also presented with outer retinal infiltrates at the time of vitritis. Inflammation subsided on immunosuppressant therapy. The presence of inflammation did not adversely affect visual outcome after VN therapy. In 1 eye, outer retinal infiltrates were demonstrated to precede later development of atrophy. Conclusions: Patients undergoing subretinal gene therapy need to be closely monitored for signs of inflammation. Although we did not observe a detrimental effect on visual function in eyes with inflammation, it seems wise to treat it appropriately because it may lead to atrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium and outer retina. Also, it seems advisable to reduce the inflammatory load, such as using a surgical technique that minimizes residual viral vectors in the vitreous body.

KW - Gene therapy

KW - Inherited retinal dystrophy

KW - RPE65

KW - Voretigene neparvovec

U2 - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.06.018

DO - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.06.018

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35760216

AN - SCOPUS:85137689290

VL - 129

SP - 1287

EP - 1293

JO - Ophthalmology

JF - Ophthalmology

SN - 0161-6420

IS - 11

ER -

ID: 323573048