Reproducibility of Mesopic and Photopic Pupil Sizes in Myopic Children Using a Dedicated Pupillometer with Human-Assisted or Automated Reading

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Reproducibility of Mesopic and Photopic Pupil Sizes in Myopic Children Using a Dedicated Pupillometer with Human-Assisted or Automated Reading. / Hvid-Hansen, Anders; Bækgaard, Per; Jacobsen, Nina; Hjortdal, Jesper; Møller, Flemming; Kessel, Line.

In: Journal of Personalized Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 2, 273, 2023.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hvid-Hansen, A, Bækgaard, P, Jacobsen, N, Hjortdal, J, Møller, F & Kessel, L 2023, 'Reproducibility of Mesopic and Photopic Pupil Sizes in Myopic Children Using a Dedicated Pupillometer with Human-Assisted or Automated Reading', Journal of Personalized Medicine, vol. 13, no. 2, 273. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020273

APA

Hvid-Hansen, A., Bækgaard, P., Jacobsen, N., Hjortdal, J., Møller, F., & Kessel, L. (2023). Reproducibility of Mesopic and Photopic Pupil Sizes in Myopic Children Using a Dedicated Pupillometer with Human-Assisted or Automated Reading. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 13(2), [273]. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020273

Vancouver

Hvid-Hansen A, Bækgaard P, Jacobsen N, Hjortdal J, Møller F, Kessel L. Reproducibility of Mesopic and Photopic Pupil Sizes in Myopic Children Using a Dedicated Pupillometer with Human-Assisted or Automated Reading. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2023;13(2). 273. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020273

Author

Hvid-Hansen, Anders ; Bækgaard, Per ; Jacobsen, Nina ; Hjortdal, Jesper ; Møller, Flemming ; Kessel, Line. / Reproducibility of Mesopic and Photopic Pupil Sizes in Myopic Children Using a Dedicated Pupillometer with Human-Assisted or Automated Reading. In: Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2023 ; Vol. 13, No. 2.

Bibtex

@article{e10184fafec34c7b8523407baae626f6,
title = "Reproducibility of Mesopic and Photopic Pupil Sizes in Myopic Children Using a Dedicated Pupillometer with Human-Assisted or Automated Reading",
abstract = "This study aimed to investigate the reproducibility of pupil size measurements over time and between reading methods when comparing human-assisted reading to automated reading. Pupillary data were analyzed on a subset of myopic children enrolled in a multicenter randomized clinical trial on myopia control with low-dose atropine. Pupil size measurements were obtained prior to randomization at two time points (screening and baseline visits) using a dedicated pupillometer under mesopic and photopic conditions. A customized algorithm was built to perform automated readings, allowing comparisons between human-assisted and automated readings. Reproducibility analyses followed the principles of Bland and Altman and included the calculation of the mean difference between measurements and limits of agreement (LOA). We included 43 children. Mean (standard deviation) age was 9.8 (1.7) years and 25 (58%) children were girls. Using human-assisted readings, reproducibility over time showed mesopic mean difference of 0.02 mm with LOA from −0.87 mm to 0.91 mm, whereas photopic mean difference was −0.01 mm with LOA from −0.25 mm to 0.23 mm. Reproducibility between human-assisted and automated readings was also higher under photopic conditions, with mean difference of 0.03 mm and LOA from −0.03 mm to 0.10 mm at screening and mean difference of 0.03 mm and LOA from −0.06 mm to 0.12 mm at baseline. Using a dedicated pupillometer, we found that examinations performed under photopic conditions demonstrated higher reproducibility over time and between reading methods. We speculate whether mesopic measurements are sufficiently reproducible to be monitored over time. Furthermore, photopic measurements may be of greater relevance when evaluating the side effects of atropine treatment, such as photophobia.",
keywords = "automated reading, limits of agreement, myopia, pupillometry, reproducibility",
author = "Anders Hvid-Hansen and Per B{\ae}kgaard and Nina Jacobsen and Jesper Hjortdal and Flemming M{\o}ller and Line Kessel",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 by the authors.",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.3390/jpm13020273",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "Journal of Personalized Medicine",
issn = "2075-4426",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reproducibility of Mesopic and Photopic Pupil Sizes in Myopic Children Using a Dedicated Pupillometer with Human-Assisted or Automated Reading

AU - Hvid-Hansen, Anders

AU - Bækgaard, Per

AU - Jacobsen, Nina

AU - Hjortdal, Jesper

AU - Møller, Flemming

AU - Kessel, Line

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 by the authors.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - This study aimed to investigate the reproducibility of pupil size measurements over time and between reading methods when comparing human-assisted reading to automated reading. Pupillary data were analyzed on a subset of myopic children enrolled in a multicenter randomized clinical trial on myopia control with low-dose atropine. Pupil size measurements were obtained prior to randomization at two time points (screening and baseline visits) using a dedicated pupillometer under mesopic and photopic conditions. A customized algorithm was built to perform automated readings, allowing comparisons between human-assisted and automated readings. Reproducibility analyses followed the principles of Bland and Altman and included the calculation of the mean difference between measurements and limits of agreement (LOA). We included 43 children. Mean (standard deviation) age was 9.8 (1.7) years and 25 (58%) children were girls. Using human-assisted readings, reproducibility over time showed mesopic mean difference of 0.02 mm with LOA from −0.87 mm to 0.91 mm, whereas photopic mean difference was −0.01 mm with LOA from −0.25 mm to 0.23 mm. Reproducibility between human-assisted and automated readings was also higher under photopic conditions, with mean difference of 0.03 mm and LOA from −0.03 mm to 0.10 mm at screening and mean difference of 0.03 mm and LOA from −0.06 mm to 0.12 mm at baseline. Using a dedicated pupillometer, we found that examinations performed under photopic conditions demonstrated higher reproducibility over time and between reading methods. We speculate whether mesopic measurements are sufficiently reproducible to be monitored over time. Furthermore, photopic measurements may be of greater relevance when evaluating the side effects of atropine treatment, such as photophobia.

AB - This study aimed to investigate the reproducibility of pupil size measurements over time and between reading methods when comparing human-assisted reading to automated reading. Pupillary data were analyzed on a subset of myopic children enrolled in a multicenter randomized clinical trial on myopia control with low-dose atropine. Pupil size measurements were obtained prior to randomization at two time points (screening and baseline visits) using a dedicated pupillometer under mesopic and photopic conditions. A customized algorithm was built to perform automated readings, allowing comparisons between human-assisted and automated readings. Reproducibility analyses followed the principles of Bland and Altman and included the calculation of the mean difference between measurements and limits of agreement (LOA). We included 43 children. Mean (standard deviation) age was 9.8 (1.7) years and 25 (58%) children were girls. Using human-assisted readings, reproducibility over time showed mesopic mean difference of 0.02 mm with LOA from −0.87 mm to 0.91 mm, whereas photopic mean difference was −0.01 mm with LOA from −0.25 mm to 0.23 mm. Reproducibility between human-assisted and automated readings was also higher under photopic conditions, with mean difference of 0.03 mm and LOA from −0.03 mm to 0.10 mm at screening and mean difference of 0.03 mm and LOA from −0.06 mm to 0.12 mm at baseline. Using a dedicated pupillometer, we found that examinations performed under photopic conditions demonstrated higher reproducibility over time and between reading methods. We speculate whether mesopic measurements are sufficiently reproducible to be monitored over time. Furthermore, photopic measurements may be of greater relevance when evaluating the side effects of atropine treatment, such as photophobia.

KW - automated reading

KW - limits of agreement

KW - myopia

KW - pupillometry

KW - reproducibility

U2 - 10.3390/jpm13020273

DO - 10.3390/jpm13020273

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 36836507

AN - SCOPUS:85148961823

VL - 13

JO - Journal of Personalized Medicine

JF - Journal of Personalized Medicine

SN - 2075-4426

IS - 2

M1 - 273

ER -

ID: 363266437