Consensus on technical procedures for simulation-based training in thoracic surgery: an international needs assessment

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Consensus on technical procedures for simulation-based training in thoracic surgery : an international needs assessment. / Haidari, Tamim Ahmad; Nayahangan, Leizl Joy; Bjerrum, Flemming; Hansen, Henrik Jessen; Konge, Lars; Massard, Gilbert; Batirel, Hasan Fevzi; Novoa, Nuria Maria; Milton, Richard Stephen; Petersen, René Horsleben; Delphi.

In: European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 63, No. 4, ezad058, 2023.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Haidari, TA, Nayahangan, LJ, Bjerrum, F, Hansen, HJ, Konge, L, Massard, G, Batirel, HF, Novoa, NM, Milton, RS, Petersen, RH & Delphi 2023, 'Consensus on technical procedures for simulation-based training in thoracic surgery: an international needs assessment', European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, vol. 63, no. 4, ezad058. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezad058

APA

Haidari, T. A., Nayahangan, L. J., Bjerrum, F., Hansen, H. J., Konge, L., Massard, G., Batirel, H. F., Novoa, N. M., Milton, R. S., Petersen, R. H., & Delphi (2023). Consensus on technical procedures for simulation-based training in thoracic surgery: an international needs assessment. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 63(4), [ezad058]. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezad058

Vancouver

Haidari TA, Nayahangan LJ, Bjerrum F, Hansen HJ, Konge L, Massard G et al. Consensus on technical procedures for simulation-based training in thoracic surgery: an international needs assessment. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2023;63(4). ezad058. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezad058

Author

Haidari, Tamim Ahmad ; Nayahangan, Leizl Joy ; Bjerrum, Flemming ; Hansen, Henrik Jessen ; Konge, Lars ; Massard, Gilbert ; Batirel, Hasan Fevzi ; Novoa, Nuria Maria ; Milton, Richard Stephen ; Petersen, René Horsleben ; Delphi. / Consensus on technical procedures for simulation-based training in thoracic surgery : an international needs assessment. In: European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2023 ; Vol. 63, No. 4.

Bibtex

@article{122c527c7b14416c95d44955869c10cd,
title = "Consensus on technical procedures for simulation-based training in thoracic surgery: an international needs assessment",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To identify and prioritize technical procedures for simulation-based training to be integrated into the thoracic surgical curriculum. METHODS: A 3-round Delphi survey was conducted from February 2022 to June 2022 among 34 key opinion leaders in thoracic surgery from 14 countries worldwide. The 1st round was a brainstorming phase to identify technical procedures that a newly qualified thoracic surgeon should be able to perform. All the suggested procedures were categorized, qualitatively analysed and sent to the 2nd round. The second round investigated: the frequency of the identified procedure at each institution, the number of thoracic surgeons that should be able to perform these procedures, the degree of risk to the patient if the procedure is performed by a non-competent thoracic surgeon and the feasibility of simulation-based education. In the 3rd round, elimination and re-ranking of the procedures from the 2nd round were performed. RESULTS: Response rates in the 3 iterative rounds were 80% (28 out of 34), 89% (25 out of 28) and 100% (25 out of 25) in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd round, respectively. Seventeen technical procedures were included for simulation-based training in the final prioritized list. The top 5 procedures were Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) lobectomy, VATS segmentectomy, VATS mediastinal lymph node dissection, diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy and robotic-assisted thoracic surgery port placement, robotic-assisted thoracic surgery docking and undocking. CONCLUSIONS: The prioritized list of procedures represents a consensus of key thoracic surgeons worldwide. These procedures are suitable for simulation-based training and should be integrated in the thoracic surgical curriculum.",
keywords = "Core curriculum, Delphi Technique, Education, Needs assessment, Simulation training, Thoracic Surgery",
author = "Haidari, {Tamim Ahmad} and Nayahangan, {Leizl Joy} and Flemming Bjerrum and Hansen, {Henrik Jessen} and Lars Konge and Gilbert Massard and Batirel, {Hasan Fevzi} and Novoa, {Nuria Maria} and Milton, {Richard Stephen} and Petersen, {Ren{\'e} Horsleben} and Delphi",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1093/ejcts/ezad058",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
journal = "European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery",
issn = "1010-7940",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consensus on technical procedures for simulation-based training in thoracic surgery

T2 - an international needs assessment

AU - Haidari, Tamim Ahmad

AU - Nayahangan, Leizl Joy

AU - Bjerrum, Flemming

AU - Hansen, Henrik Jessen

AU - Konge, Lars

AU - Massard, Gilbert

AU - Batirel, Hasan Fevzi

AU - Novoa, Nuria Maria

AU - Milton, Richard Stephen

AU - Petersen, René Horsleben

AU - Delphi

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To identify and prioritize technical procedures for simulation-based training to be integrated into the thoracic surgical curriculum. METHODS: A 3-round Delphi survey was conducted from February 2022 to June 2022 among 34 key opinion leaders in thoracic surgery from 14 countries worldwide. The 1st round was a brainstorming phase to identify technical procedures that a newly qualified thoracic surgeon should be able to perform. All the suggested procedures were categorized, qualitatively analysed and sent to the 2nd round. The second round investigated: the frequency of the identified procedure at each institution, the number of thoracic surgeons that should be able to perform these procedures, the degree of risk to the patient if the procedure is performed by a non-competent thoracic surgeon and the feasibility of simulation-based education. In the 3rd round, elimination and re-ranking of the procedures from the 2nd round were performed. RESULTS: Response rates in the 3 iterative rounds were 80% (28 out of 34), 89% (25 out of 28) and 100% (25 out of 25) in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd round, respectively. Seventeen technical procedures were included for simulation-based training in the final prioritized list. The top 5 procedures were Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) lobectomy, VATS segmentectomy, VATS mediastinal lymph node dissection, diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy and robotic-assisted thoracic surgery port placement, robotic-assisted thoracic surgery docking and undocking. CONCLUSIONS: The prioritized list of procedures represents a consensus of key thoracic surgeons worldwide. These procedures are suitable for simulation-based training and should be integrated in the thoracic surgical curriculum.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To identify and prioritize technical procedures for simulation-based training to be integrated into the thoracic surgical curriculum. METHODS: A 3-round Delphi survey was conducted from February 2022 to June 2022 among 34 key opinion leaders in thoracic surgery from 14 countries worldwide. The 1st round was a brainstorming phase to identify technical procedures that a newly qualified thoracic surgeon should be able to perform. All the suggested procedures were categorized, qualitatively analysed and sent to the 2nd round. The second round investigated: the frequency of the identified procedure at each institution, the number of thoracic surgeons that should be able to perform these procedures, the degree of risk to the patient if the procedure is performed by a non-competent thoracic surgeon and the feasibility of simulation-based education. In the 3rd round, elimination and re-ranking of the procedures from the 2nd round were performed. RESULTS: Response rates in the 3 iterative rounds were 80% (28 out of 34), 89% (25 out of 28) and 100% (25 out of 25) in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd round, respectively. Seventeen technical procedures were included for simulation-based training in the final prioritized list. The top 5 procedures were Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) lobectomy, VATS segmentectomy, VATS mediastinal lymph node dissection, diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy and robotic-assisted thoracic surgery port placement, robotic-assisted thoracic surgery docking and undocking. CONCLUSIONS: The prioritized list of procedures represents a consensus of key thoracic surgeons worldwide. These procedures are suitable for simulation-based training and should be integrated in the thoracic surgical curriculum.

KW - Core curriculum

KW - Delphi Technique

KW - Education

KW - Needs assessment

KW - Simulation training

KW - Thoracic Surgery

U2 - 10.1093/ejcts/ezad058

DO - 10.1093/ejcts/ezad058

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 36808223

AN - SCOPUS:85159245149

VL - 63

JO - European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery

JF - European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery

SN - 1010-7940

IS - 4

M1 - ezad058

ER -

ID: 366992973