Evidence on reporting guidelines for surgical technique in clinical disciplines: a scoping review protocol
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Evidence on reporting guidelines for surgical technique in clinical disciplines : a scoping review protocol. / Zhang, Kaiping; Ma, Yanfang; Shi, Qianling; Shen, Jianfei; Wu, Jinlin; Zhang, Xianzhuo; Jiao, Panpan; Li, Grace S; Tang, Xueqin; Petersen, René Horsleben; Ng, Calvin S H; Fiorelli, Alfonso; Novoa, Nuria M; Bedetti, Benedetta; Levi Sandri, Giovanni Battista; Hochwald, Steven; Lerut, Toni; Sihoe, Alan D L; Barchi, Leandro Cardoso; Gilbert, Sebastien; Waseda, Ryuichi; Toker, Alper; Gonzalez-Rivas, Diego; Fruscio, Robert; Scarci, Marco; Davoli, Fabio; Piessen, Guillaume; Qiu, Bin; Wang, Stephen D; Chen, Yaolong; Gao, Shugeng.
In: Gland Surgery, Vol. 10, No. 7, 2021, p. 2325-2333.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Evidence on reporting guidelines for surgical technique in clinical disciplines
T2 - a scoping review protocol
AU - Zhang, Kaiping
AU - Ma, Yanfang
AU - Shi, Qianling
AU - Shen, Jianfei
AU - Wu, Jinlin
AU - Zhang, Xianzhuo
AU - Jiao, Panpan
AU - Li, Grace S
AU - Tang, Xueqin
AU - Petersen, René Horsleben
AU - Ng, Calvin S H
AU - Fiorelli, Alfonso
AU - Novoa, Nuria M
AU - Bedetti, Benedetta
AU - Levi Sandri, Giovanni Battista
AU - Hochwald, Steven
AU - Lerut, Toni
AU - Sihoe, Alan D L
AU - Barchi, Leandro Cardoso
AU - Gilbert, Sebastien
AU - Waseda, Ryuichi
AU - Toker, Alper
AU - Gonzalez-Rivas, Diego
AU - Fruscio, Robert
AU - Scarci, Marco
AU - Davoli, Fabio
AU - Piessen, Guillaume
AU - Qiu, Bin
AU - Wang, Stephen D
AU - Chen, Yaolong
AU - Gao, Shugeng
N1 - 2021 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Background: The reporting of surgical techniques is of mixed quality, with most at a very minimal level. Reporting guidelines that could be applied to guide surgical technique reporting vary in methodology for development, discipline coverage, dimension coverage and detail requested. However, a scoping review that could indicate the gaps and efforts needed in surgical technique reporting guidelines is lacking and warranted. This study aims to design a methodological rigour protocol to guide the development of a scoping review of surgical technique reporting guidelines.Methods: This protocol is designed following the 2020 manual proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. To further ensure the soundness of the protocol, we also included multidisciplinary professionals (including methodologists, clinicians, and journal editors) to refine the protocol.Discussion: Seven key steps for developing the scoping review are identified and presented in detail, including (I) identifying the research questions; (II) inclusion criteria; (III) search strategy; (IV) source of evidence selection; (V) data extraction; (VI) analysis of the evidence; and (VII) presentation of the results. Guided by this protocol, the subsequent scoping review will inform us the overview of surgical technique reporting guidelines and precisely guide our direction and next steps in improving surgical technique reporting guidelines.Trial registration: This protocol is not registered as the PROSPERO database only accepts registration of systematic review protocols while does not accept registration of scoping review protocols.
AB - Background: The reporting of surgical techniques is of mixed quality, with most at a very minimal level. Reporting guidelines that could be applied to guide surgical technique reporting vary in methodology for development, discipline coverage, dimension coverage and detail requested. However, a scoping review that could indicate the gaps and efforts needed in surgical technique reporting guidelines is lacking and warranted. This study aims to design a methodological rigour protocol to guide the development of a scoping review of surgical technique reporting guidelines.Methods: This protocol is designed following the 2020 manual proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. To further ensure the soundness of the protocol, we also included multidisciplinary professionals (including methodologists, clinicians, and journal editors) to refine the protocol.Discussion: Seven key steps for developing the scoping review are identified and presented in detail, including (I) identifying the research questions; (II) inclusion criteria; (III) search strategy; (IV) source of evidence selection; (V) data extraction; (VI) analysis of the evidence; and (VII) presentation of the results. Guided by this protocol, the subsequent scoping review will inform us the overview of surgical technique reporting guidelines and precisely guide our direction and next steps in improving surgical technique reporting guidelines.Trial registration: This protocol is not registered as the PROSPERO database only accepts registration of systematic review protocols while does not accept registration of scoping review protocols.
U2 - 10.21037/gs-21-311
DO - 10.21037/gs-21-311
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 34422603
VL - 10
SP - 2325
EP - 2333
JO - Gland Surgery
JF - Gland Surgery
SN - 2227-684X
IS - 7
ER -
ID: 290532262