Evidence on reporting guidelines for surgical technique in clinical disciplines: a scoping review protocol

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Evidence on reporting guidelines for surgical technique in clinical disciplines : a scoping review protocol. / Zhang, Kaiping; Ma, Yanfang; Shi, Qianling; Shen, Jianfei; Wu, Jinlin; Zhang, Xianzhuo; Jiao, Panpan; Li, Grace S; Tang, Xueqin; Petersen, René Horsleben; Ng, Calvin S H; Fiorelli, Alfonso; Novoa, Nuria M; Bedetti, Benedetta; Levi Sandri, Giovanni Battista; Hochwald, Steven; Lerut, Toni; Sihoe, Alan D L; Barchi, Leandro Cardoso; Gilbert, Sebastien; Waseda, Ryuichi; Toker, Alper; Gonzalez-Rivas, Diego; Fruscio, Robert; Scarci, Marco; Davoli, Fabio; Piessen, Guillaume; Qiu, Bin; Wang, Stephen D; Chen, Yaolong; Gao, Shugeng.

In: Gland Surgery, Vol. 10, No. 7, 2021, p. 2325-2333.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Zhang, K, Ma, Y, Shi, Q, Shen, J, Wu, J, Zhang, X, Jiao, P, Li, GS, Tang, X, Petersen, RH, Ng, CSH, Fiorelli, A, Novoa, NM, Bedetti, B, Levi Sandri, GB, Hochwald, S, Lerut, T, Sihoe, ADL, Barchi, LC, Gilbert, S, Waseda, R, Toker, A, Gonzalez-Rivas, D, Fruscio, R, Scarci, M, Davoli, F, Piessen, G, Qiu, B, Wang, SD, Chen, Y & Gao, S 2021, 'Evidence on reporting guidelines for surgical technique in clinical disciplines: a scoping review protocol', Gland Surgery, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 2325-2333. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-21-311

APA

Zhang, K., Ma, Y., Shi, Q., Shen, J., Wu, J., Zhang, X., Jiao, P., Li, G. S., Tang, X., Petersen, R. H., Ng, C. S. H., Fiorelli, A., Novoa, N. M., Bedetti, B., Levi Sandri, G. B., Hochwald, S., Lerut, T., Sihoe, A. D. L., Barchi, L. C., ... Gao, S. (2021). Evidence on reporting guidelines for surgical technique in clinical disciplines: a scoping review protocol. Gland Surgery, 10(7), 2325-2333. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-21-311

Vancouver

Zhang K, Ma Y, Shi Q, Shen J, Wu J, Zhang X et al. Evidence on reporting guidelines for surgical technique in clinical disciplines: a scoping review protocol. Gland Surgery. 2021;10(7):2325-2333. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-21-311

Author

Zhang, Kaiping ; Ma, Yanfang ; Shi, Qianling ; Shen, Jianfei ; Wu, Jinlin ; Zhang, Xianzhuo ; Jiao, Panpan ; Li, Grace S ; Tang, Xueqin ; Petersen, René Horsleben ; Ng, Calvin S H ; Fiorelli, Alfonso ; Novoa, Nuria M ; Bedetti, Benedetta ; Levi Sandri, Giovanni Battista ; Hochwald, Steven ; Lerut, Toni ; Sihoe, Alan D L ; Barchi, Leandro Cardoso ; Gilbert, Sebastien ; Waseda, Ryuichi ; Toker, Alper ; Gonzalez-Rivas, Diego ; Fruscio, Robert ; Scarci, Marco ; Davoli, Fabio ; Piessen, Guillaume ; Qiu, Bin ; Wang, Stephen D ; Chen, Yaolong ; Gao, Shugeng. / Evidence on reporting guidelines for surgical technique in clinical disciplines : a scoping review protocol. In: Gland Surgery. 2021 ; Vol. 10, No. 7. pp. 2325-2333.

Bibtex

@article{42f70d8455344a90916063d8f377597e,
title = "Evidence on reporting guidelines for surgical technique in clinical disciplines: a scoping review protocol",
abstract = "Background: The reporting of surgical techniques is of mixed quality, with most at a very minimal level. Reporting guidelines that could be applied to guide surgical technique reporting vary in methodology for development, discipline coverage, dimension coverage and detail requested. However, a scoping review that could indicate the gaps and efforts needed in surgical technique reporting guidelines is lacking and warranted. This study aims to design a methodological rigour protocol to guide the development of a scoping review of surgical technique reporting guidelines.Methods: This protocol is designed following the 2020 manual proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. To further ensure the soundness of the protocol, we also included multidisciplinary professionals (including methodologists, clinicians, and journal editors) to refine the protocol.Discussion: Seven key steps for developing the scoping review are identified and presented in detail, including (I) identifying the research questions; (II) inclusion criteria; (III) search strategy; (IV) source of evidence selection; (V) data extraction; (VI) analysis of the evidence; and (VII) presentation of the results. Guided by this protocol, the subsequent scoping review will inform us the overview of surgical technique reporting guidelines and precisely guide our direction and next steps in improving surgical technique reporting guidelines.Trial registration: This protocol is not registered as the PROSPERO database only accepts registration of systematic review protocols while does not accept registration of scoping review protocols.",
author = "Kaiping Zhang and Yanfang Ma and Qianling Shi and Jianfei Shen and Jinlin Wu and Xianzhuo Zhang and Panpan Jiao and Li, {Grace S} and Xueqin Tang and Petersen, {Ren{\'e} Horsleben} and Ng, {Calvin S H} and Alfonso Fiorelli and Novoa, {Nuria M} and Benedetta Bedetti and {Levi Sandri}, {Giovanni Battista} and Steven Hochwald and Toni Lerut and Sihoe, {Alan D L} and Barchi, {Leandro Cardoso} and Sebastien Gilbert and Ryuichi Waseda and Alper Toker and Diego Gonzalez-Rivas and Robert Fruscio and Marco Scarci and Fabio Davoli and Guillaume Piessen and Bin Qiu and Wang, {Stephen D} and Yaolong Chen and Shugeng Gao",
note = "2021 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.21037/gs-21-311",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "2325--2333",
journal = "Gland Surgery",
issn = "2227-684X",
publisher = "AME Publishing Company",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence on reporting guidelines for surgical technique in clinical disciplines

T2 - a scoping review protocol

AU - Zhang, Kaiping

AU - Ma, Yanfang

AU - Shi, Qianling

AU - Shen, Jianfei

AU - Wu, Jinlin

AU - Zhang, Xianzhuo

AU - Jiao, Panpan

AU - Li, Grace S

AU - Tang, Xueqin

AU - Petersen, René Horsleben

AU - Ng, Calvin S H

AU - Fiorelli, Alfonso

AU - Novoa, Nuria M

AU - Bedetti, Benedetta

AU - Levi Sandri, Giovanni Battista

AU - Hochwald, Steven

AU - Lerut, Toni

AU - Sihoe, Alan D L

AU - Barchi, Leandro Cardoso

AU - Gilbert, Sebastien

AU - Waseda, Ryuichi

AU - Toker, Alper

AU - Gonzalez-Rivas, Diego

AU - Fruscio, Robert

AU - Scarci, Marco

AU - Davoli, Fabio

AU - Piessen, Guillaume

AU - Qiu, Bin

AU - Wang, Stephen D

AU - Chen, Yaolong

AU - Gao, Shugeng

N1 - 2021 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Background: The reporting of surgical techniques is of mixed quality, with most at a very minimal level. Reporting guidelines that could be applied to guide surgical technique reporting vary in methodology for development, discipline coverage, dimension coverage and detail requested. However, a scoping review that could indicate the gaps and efforts needed in surgical technique reporting guidelines is lacking and warranted. This study aims to design a methodological rigour protocol to guide the development of a scoping review of surgical technique reporting guidelines.Methods: This protocol is designed following the 2020 manual proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. To further ensure the soundness of the protocol, we also included multidisciplinary professionals (including methodologists, clinicians, and journal editors) to refine the protocol.Discussion: Seven key steps for developing the scoping review are identified and presented in detail, including (I) identifying the research questions; (II) inclusion criteria; (III) search strategy; (IV) source of evidence selection; (V) data extraction; (VI) analysis of the evidence; and (VII) presentation of the results. Guided by this protocol, the subsequent scoping review will inform us the overview of surgical technique reporting guidelines and precisely guide our direction and next steps in improving surgical technique reporting guidelines.Trial registration: This protocol is not registered as the PROSPERO database only accepts registration of systematic review protocols while does not accept registration of scoping review protocols.

AB - Background: The reporting of surgical techniques is of mixed quality, with most at a very minimal level. Reporting guidelines that could be applied to guide surgical technique reporting vary in methodology for development, discipline coverage, dimension coverage and detail requested. However, a scoping review that could indicate the gaps and efforts needed in surgical technique reporting guidelines is lacking and warranted. This study aims to design a methodological rigour protocol to guide the development of a scoping review of surgical technique reporting guidelines.Methods: This protocol is designed following the 2020 manual proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. To further ensure the soundness of the protocol, we also included multidisciplinary professionals (including methodologists, clinicians, and journal editors) to refine the protocol.Discussion: Seven key steps for developing the scoping review are identified and presented in detail, including (I) identifying the research questions; (II) inclusion criteria; (III) search strategy; (IV) source of evidence selection; (V) data extraction; (VI) analysis of the evidence; and (VII) presentation of the results. Guided by this protocol, the subsequent scoping review will inform us the overview of surgical technique reporting guidelines and precisely guide our direction and next steps in improving surgical technique reporting guidelines.Trial registration: This protocol is not registered as the PROSPERO database only accepts registration of systematic review protocols while does not accept registration of scoping review protocols.

U2 - 10.21037/gs-21-311

DO - 10.21037/gs-21-311

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34422603

VL - 10

SP - 2325

EP - 2333

JO - Gland Surgery

JF - Gland Surgery

SN - 2227-684X

IS - 7

ER -

ID: 290532262