Predictors of reoperation after lung volume reduction surgery

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Predictors of reoperation after lung volume reduction surgery. / Lund, Alberte; Soldath, Patrick; Nodin, Erika; Hansen, Henrik Jessen; Perch, Michael; Jensen, Kristine; Hornbech, Kåre; Kalhauge, Anna; Mortensen, Jann; Petersen, René Horsleben.

In: Surgical Endoscopy, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2024, p. 679-687.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Lund, A, Soldath, P, Nodin, E, Hansen, HJ, Perch, M, Jensen, K, Hornbech, K, Kalhauge, A, Mortensen, J & Petersen, RH 2024, 'Predictors of reoperation after lung volume reduction surgery', Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 679-687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10559-z

APA

Lund, A., Soldath, P., Nodin, E., Hansen, H. J., Perch, M., Jensen, K., Hornbech, K., Kalhauge, A., Mortensen, J., & Petersen, R. H. (2024). Predictors of reoperation after lung volume reduction surgery. Surgical Endoscopy, 38(2), 679-687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10559-z

Vancouver

Lund A, Soldath P, Nodin E, Hansen HJ, Perch M, Jensen K et al. Predictors of reoperation after lung volume reduction surgery. Surgical Endoscopy. 2024;38(2):679-687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10559-z

Author

Lund, Alberte ; Soldath, Patrick ; Nodin, Erika ; Hansen, Henrik Jessen ; Perch, Michael ; Jensen, Kristine ; Hornbech, Kåre ; Kalhauge, Anna ; Mortensen, Jann ; Petersen, René Horsleben. / Predictors of reoperation after lung volume reduction surgery. In: Surgical Endoscopy. 2024 ; Vol. 38, No. 2. pp. 679-687.

Bibtex

@article{7b3f025da33342169fbedbaa8c7842e4,
title = "Predictors of reoperation after lung volume reduction surgery",
abstract = "Objectives: Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) has proven an effective treatment for emphysema, by decreasing hyperinflation and improving lung function, activity level and reducing dyspnoea. However, postoperative air leak is an important complication, often leading to reoperation. Our aim was to analyse reoperations after LVRS and identify potential predictors. Methods: Consecutive single-centre unilateral VATS LVRS performed from 2017 to 2022 were included. Typically, 3–5 minor resections were made using vascular magazines without buttressing. Data were obtained from an institutional database and analysed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of reoperation. Number and location of injuries were registered. Results: In total, 191 patients were included, 25 were reoperated (13%). In 21 patients, the indication for reoperation was substantial air leak, 3 patients bleeding and 1 patient empyema. Length of stay (LOS) was 21 (11–33) vs. 5 days (3–11), respectively. Only 3 injuries were in the stapler line, 13 within < 2cm and 15 injuries were in another site. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that decreasing DLCO increased risk of reoperation, OR 1.1 (1.03, 1.18, P = 0.005). Resections in only one lobe, compared to resections in multiple lobes, were also a risk factor OR 3.10 (1.17, 9.32, P = 0.03). Patients undergoing reoperation had significantly increased 30-day mortality, OR 5.52 (1.03, 26.69, P = 0.02). Conclusions: Our incidence of reoperation after LVRS was 13% leading to prolonged LOS and increased 30-day mortality. Low DLCO and resections in a single lobe were significant predictors of reoperation. The air leak was usually not localized in the stapler line. Graphical abstract: Key question: What characterizes reoperations after lung volume reduction surgeries? Key findings: Lung injuries were predominantly located away from the original surgical site. Take home message: Lung injuries remote from the stapler line is frequent during reoperation after lung volume reduction surgery. Location of lung injuries found during reoperation after lung volume reduction surgery [Figure not available: see fulltext.].",
keywords = "COPD, Lung volume reduction surgery, Prolonged air leak, Reoperation, Risk factors",
author = "Alberte Lund and Patrick Soldath and Erika Nodin and Hansen, {Henrik Jessen} and Michael Perch and Kristine Jensen and K{\aa}re Hornbech and Anna Kalhauge and Jann Mortensen and Petersen, {Ren{\'e} Horsleben}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023, The Author(s).",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-023-10559-z",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "679--687",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predictors of reoperation after lung volume reduction surgery

AU - Lund, Alberte

AU - Soldath, Patrick

AU - Nodin, Erika

AU - Hansen, Henrik Jessen

AU - Perch, Michael

AU - Jensen, Kristine

AU - Hornbech, Kåre

AU - Kalhauge, Anna

AU - Mortensen, Jann

AU - Petersen, René Horsleben

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023, The Author(s).

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Objectives: Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) has proven an effective treatment for emphysema, by decreasing hyperinflation and improving lung function, activity level and reducing dyspnoea. However, postoperative air leak is an important complication, often leading to reoperation. Our aim was to analyse reoperations after LVRS and identify potential predictors. Methods: Consecutive single-centre unilateral VATS LVRS performed from 2017 to 2022 were included. Typically, 3–5 minor resections were made using vascular magazines without buttressing. Data were obtained from an institutional database and analysed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of reoperation. Number and location of injuries were registered. Results: In total, 191 patients were included, 25 were reoperated (13%). In 21 patients, the indication for reoperation was substantial air leak, 3 patients bleeding and 1 patient empyema. Length of stay (LOS) was 21 (11–33) vs. 5 days (3–11), respectively. Only 3 injuries were in the stapler line, 13 within < 2cm and 15 injuries were in another site. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that decreasing DLCO increased risk of reoperation, OR 1.1 (1.03, 1.18, P = 0.005). Resections in only one lobe, compared to resections in multiple lobes, were also a risk factor OR 3.10 (1.17, 9.32, P = 0.03). Patients undergoing reoperation had significantly increased 30-day mortality, OR 5.52 (1.03, 26.69, P = 0.02). Conclusions: Our incidence of reoperation after LVRS was 13% leading to prolonged LOS and increased 30-day mortality. Low DLCO and resections in a single lobe were significant predictors of reoperation. The air leak was usually not localized in the stapler line. Graphical abstract: Key question: What characterizes reoperations after lung volume reduction surgeries? Key findings: Lung injuries were predominantly located away from the original surgical site. Take home message: Lung injuries remote from the stapler line is frequent during reoperation after lung volume reduction surgery. Location of lung injuries found during reoperation after lung volume reduction surgery [Figure not available: see fulltext.].

AB - Objectives: Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) has proven an effective treatment for emphysema, by decreasing hyperinflation and improving lung function, activity level and reducing dyspnoea. However, postoperative air leak is an important complication, often leading to reoperation. Our aim was to analyse reoperations after LVRS and identify potential predictors. Methods: Consecutive single-centre unilateral VATS LVRS performed from 2017 to 2022 were included. Typically, 3–5 minor resections were made using vascular magazines without buttressing. Data were obtained from an institutional database and analysed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of reoperation. Number and location of injuries were registered. Results: In total, 191 patients were included, 25 were reoperated (13%). In 21 patients, the indication for reoperation was substantial air leak, 3 patients bleeding and 1 patient empyema. Length of stay (LOS) was 21 (11–33) vs. 5 days (3–11), respectively. Only 3 injuries were in the stapler line, 13 within < 2cm and 15 injuries were in another site. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that decreasing DLCO increased risk of reoperation, OR 1.1 (1.03, 1.18, P = 0.005). Resections in only one lobe, compared to resections in multiple lobes, were also a risk factor OR 3.10 (1.17, 9.32, P = 0.03). Patients undergoing reoperation had significantly increased 30-day mortality, OR 5.52 (1.03, 26.69, P = 0.02). Conclusions: Our incidence of reoperation after LVRS was 13% leading to prolonged LOS and increased 30-day mortality. Low DLCO and resections in a single lobe were significant predictors of reoperation. The air leak was usually not localized in the stapler line. Graphical abstract: Key question: What characterizes reoperations after lung volume reduction surgeries? Key findings: Lung injuries were predominantly located away from the original surgical site. Take home message: Lung injuries remote from the stapler line is frequent during reoperation after lung volume reduction surgery. Location of lung injuries found during reoperation after lung volume reduction surgery [Figure not available: see fulltext.].

KW - COPD

KW - Lung volume reduction surgery

KW - Prolonged air leak

KW - Reoperation

KW - Risk factors

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-023-10559-z

DO - 10.1007/s00464-023-10559-z

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 38017156

AN - SCOPUS:85177733483

VL - 38

SP - 679

EP - 687

JO - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

JF - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 382982465