The SUPER reporting guideline suggested for reporting of surgical technique: explanation and elaboration

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Kaiping Zhang
  • Jinlin Wu
  • Zhanhao Su
  • Yanfang Ma
  • Qianling Shi
  • Leandro Cardoso Barchi
  • Tanel Laisaar
  • Calvin S.H. Ng
  • Sebastien Gilbert
  • Xianzhuo Zhang
  • Tomaž Štupnik
  • Toni Lerut
  • Panpan Jiao
  • Hussein Elkhayat
  • Nuria M. Novoa
  • Robert Fruscio
  • Ryuichi Waseda
  • Alfonso Fiorelli
  • Alan D.L. Sihoe
  • Diego Gonzalez-Rivas
  • Marco Scarci
  • Marcelo F. Jimenez
  • Grace S. Li
  • Xueqin Tang
  • Stephen D. Wang
  • Yaolong Chen

Background: Surgical technique plays an essential role in achieving good health outcomes. However, the quality of surgical technique reporting remains heterogeneous. Reporting checklists could help authors to describe the surgical technique more transparently and effectively, as well as to assist reviewers and editors evaluate it more informatively, and promote readers to better understand the technique. We previously developed SUPER (surgical technique reporting checklist and standards) to assist authors in reporting their research that contains surgical technique more transparently. However, further explanation and elaboration of each item are needed for better understanding and reporting practice. Methods: We searched surgical literature in PubMed, Google Scholar and journal websites published up to January 2023 to find multidiscipline examples in various article types for each SUPER item. Results: We explain the 22 items of the SUPER and provide rationales item by item alongside. We provide 69 examples from 53 literature that present optimal reporting of the 22 items. Article types of examples include pure surgical technique, and case reports, observational studies and clinical trials that contain surgical technique. Examples are multidisciplinary, including general surgery, orthopaedical surgery, cardiac surgery, thoracic surgery, gastrointestinal surgery, neurological surgery, oncogenic surgery, and emergency surgery etc. Conclusions: Along with SUPER article, this explanation and elaboration file can promote deeper understanding on the SUPER items. We hope that the article could further guide surgeons and researchers in reporting, and assist editors and peer reviewers in reviewing manuscripts related to surgical technique.

Original languageEnglish
JournalGland Surgery
Volume12
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)749-766
Number of pages18
ISSN2227-684X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Guidelines Research Fund (No. 2020-1016-885) and Lanzhou University Research Unit for Evidence-Based Evaluation and Guidelines, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Fund (No. 2021RU017).

Funding Information:
Conflicts of interest disclosures have the potential to reduce bias, yet the current disclosure of conflicts of interest is worrying (65,66). Every author should disclose their conflicts of interest, both financial and non-financial, as defined by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (67) and as required by each journal. For example, if a new device is introduced in a surgical technique, the relationship between the manufacturer and the authors should be disclosed (Appendix 2, Example 66). Another example is that if the project is supported by a funder, the

Funding Information:
Funding: This project was supported by the AME Reporting

Publisher Copyright:
© Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.

    Research areas

  • guideline, reporting checklist, SUPER, surgery, Surgical technique

ID: 388019012